1 / 41

Evo -Ed: A Case-based Approach to Teaching Evolution

Evo -Ed: A Case-based Approach to Teaching Evolution. Peter White, Merle Heidemann , and Jim Smith Michigan State University East Lansing, MI USA. Evolution of Toxin Resistance in Clams. Evolution of Toxin Resistance in Clams. Algal blooms affecting marine ecosystems.

Jeffrey
Download Presentation

Evo -Ed: A Case-based Approach to Teaching Evolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evo-Ed: A Case-based Approach to Teaching Evolution Peter White, Merle Heidemann, and Jim Smith Michigan State University East Lansing, MI USA

  2. Evolution of Toxin Resistance in Clams

  3. Evolution of Toxin Resistance in Clams Algal blooms affecting marine ecosystems. Food webs and biomagnification of toxins. Human interaction with ecosystem. Different allele frequencies in geographically isolated populations due to different environmental conditions. Mendelian genetics, inheritance and dominant-recessive relationships. Single nucleotide substitution mutation that changes the structure and function of a protein. Action potential transmission through a neuron. Can you connect any of these topics to the curriculum you teach? If so, which ones?

  4. Teaching Evolution Teaching evolution necessitates the teaching of: • Natural Selection • Genetics • Cell biology • Central Dogma (DNA  RNA  Proteins) • Population Genetics / Biogeography • Community Ecology • Phylogenetics • …and more!

  5. May, 2013

  6. Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems • Ecology • Biodiversity • Animal Behavior • Inheritance and Variation of Traits • Genetics • DNA and mutation • Cell division • Central Dogma • Structure and Function • Cell Biology • Physiology May, 2013 • Matter and Energy in Organisms and Ecosystems • Photosynthesis • Cellular Respiration • Species Interactions • Natural Selection and Evolution • Natural Selection • Phylogenetics • Population Ecology

  7. Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems • Ecology • Biodiversity • Animal Behavior • Inheritance and Variation of Traits • Genetics • DNA and mutation • Cell division • Central Dogma • Structure and Function • Cell Biology • Physiology May, 2013 • Matter and Energy in Organisms and Ecosystems • Photosynthesis • Cellular Respiration • Species Interactions • Natural Selection and Evolution • Natural Selection • Phylogenetics • Population Ecology

  8. Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems • Ecology • Biodiversity • Animal Behavior • Inheritance and Variation of Traits • Genetics • DNA and mutation • Cell division • Central Dogma • Structure and Function • Cell Biology • Physiology May, 2013 • Matter and Energy in Organisms and Ecosystems • Photosynthesis • Cellular Respiration • Species Interactions • Natural Selection and Evolution • Natural Selection • Phylogenetics • Population Ecology

  9. Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems • Ecology • Biodiversity • Animal Behavior EVOLUTION • Inheritance and Variation of Traits • Genetics • DNA and mutation • Cell division • Central Dogma • Structure and Function • Cell Biology • Physiology May, 2013 • Matter and Energy in Organisms and Ecosystems • Photosynthesis • Cellular Respiration • Species Interactions • Natural Selection and Evolution • Natural Selection • Phylogenetics • Population Ecology

  10. “[Students] leave schools without fully understanding how well supported evolutionary theory is.” • “Many teachers are not scientifically capable of teaching evolution using modern approaches.”

  11. Develop cases that promote the learning of evolution as an integrative biological theory. • Provide teaching resources for science teachers so they can teach evolution as an integrative biological theory.

  12. Trichromatic Vision Evolution in Primates Fur Color Evolution in Beach Mice Seed Taste Evolution in Field Peas Toxin Resistance Evolution in Clams www.evo-ed.com

  13. “What does a Case look like?” www.evo-ed.com

  14. Splash Page has brief descriptions of cases and links to resources www.evo-ed.com

  15. www.evo-ed.com

  16. Case Splash Page has links to different aspects of the biology www.evo-ed.com

  17. www.evo-ed.com

  18. What is a protein? Draw a picture. What does this protein do? Intro Bio II (LB145) S12Minute Paper #1

  19. What is a protein? Draw a picture. What does this protein do? Student “A” “A protein is a substance that is made up of amino acids. DNA is a protein. Proteins are containers for genetic information to be stored in. This protein houses material that determines hair color.” Student “B” “A protein is a very important concept in cellular growth. I couldn’t, for the life of me, draw you one right now but hopefully I will be able to soon because I honestly have no idea where to even begin. (Added later) A protein is a chain of amino acids.” Students have very crude mental models of proteins

  20. Mouse Fur Color MC1R protein is stimulated and facilitates cAMP production. cAMP is used to regulate gene expression. c(tyr) Tyrp1 Tyrp2 p

  21. Select a Set of Mouse Case PowerPoint Slides

  22. Mouse Case:A Sample Lesson https://www.msu.edu/course/lb/145/smith/s13/index.html

  23. Backward Design(Wiggins & McTighe 2005) Learning Objectives

  24. Assessment

  25. Exam

  26. Instructional Activities

  27. Instructional Activities

  28. Support for an integrated approach?

  29. The Evo-Ed Project: • A Case Approach to Evolution Education • Integrative cases that explore trait evolution across biological scales. Is there a relationship between the case approach and learning?

  30. The Assessment Tool for Evaluating Evolution Knowledge (ATEEK) • Iterative design process (Anderson and Bishop 1990) • Determine essential concepts important to evolution. • Design an assessment tool that probes for those concepts. • Field test the assessment tool. • Evaluate student responses. Revise a given question if the pattern of responses differs from the expected pattern. • Field test the revised assessment tool. • Repeat steps 4 and 5 until satisfied with the pattern of answers.

  31. The ATEEK Q1.Jaguars can have an orange coat or a black coat. Orange jaguars have either two G alleles or one G allele and one g allele, whereas black jaguars have two g alleles. When a jaguar has the genotype gg, what happens inside its cells so that a black coat is produced? Q2. Toxican mushrooms contain a toxin that causes vomiting when ingested. Recently, some Toxican mushrooms were found that did not produce the toxin. Describe in detail what might have happened at the molecular level so that these mushrooms no longer produce this toxin? Q3. The non-poisonous Toxican mushroom has become more frequent in mushroom populations and poisonous Toxican mushrooms have become rare. Define Natural Selection and use it to explain this scenario. Q4. Considering genetic mutation – Describe, at the molecular level, what a mutation is. Use your answer from part (i) to describe the process whereby a mutation results in a change at the phenotype level.

  32. www.evo-ed.com Scoring the ATEEK • A response could be scored as 0, 1, or 2. • 0: Answer is wrong of mostly wrong. • 1: Answer is partially right. • 2: Answer is completely correct or mostly correct. • Average student GAIN calculated for each question GAIN = Post-Course ATEEK Score – Pre-Course ATEEK Score

  33. Q1: Jaguars can have an orange coat or a black coat. Orange jaguars have either two G alleles or one G allele and one g allele, whereas black jaguars have two g alleles. When a jaguar has the genotype gg, what happens inside its cells so that a black coat is produced? Gain (post-course – pre-course) Learned evolution using integrative cases Did not learn evolution using integrative cases

  34. Q2: Toxican mushrooms contain a toxin that causes vomiting when ingested. Recently, some Toxican mushrooms were found that did not produce the toxin. Describe in detail what might have happened at the molecular level so that these mushrooms no longer produce this toxin? Gain (post-course – pre-course) Learned evolution using integrative cases Did not learn evolution using integrative cases

  35. Q3: The non-poisonous Toxican mushroom has become more frequent in mushroom populations and poisonous Toxican mushrooms have become rare. Define Natural Selection and use it to explain this scenario. Gain (post-course – pre-course) Learned evolution using integrative cases Did not learn evolution using integrative cases

  36. Q4i: Considering genetic mutation – Describe, at the molecular level, what a mutation is. Gain (post-course – pre-course) Learned evolution using integrative cases Did not learn evolution using integrative cases

  37. Q4ii: Use your answer from part (i) to describe the process whereby a mutation results in a change at the phenotype level. Gain (post-course – pre-course) Learned evolution using integrative cases Did not learn evolution using integrative cases

  38. The Evo-Ed Project: • “[Students] leave schools without fully understanding how well supported evolutionary theory is.” • Cases may help students understand how novel phenotypes arise starting from the most basic building blocks of life. • Cases give students concrete examples of evolution. • Integrative approach good idea anyways? (Data seem to support it too)

  39. The Evo-Ed Project: • “Many teachers are not scientifically capable of teaching evolution using modern approaches.” • Evo-Ed Website:http://www.evo-ed.com • Explanation of cases andcorresponding .pptresources.

  40. Questions? Discussion?

  41. Thanks to Kathie Ellis, Joe Murray, Miles Loh, Mark Kauth, Kendra Cheruvelil, Chuck Elzinga, Gerry Urquhart, Cheryl Murphy, Andy Jarosz, Doug Luckie, Richard Lenski, Craig Nelson and Lyman Briggs College for their contributions to the project. Acknowledgements:Partial support for this work was provided by the NSF TUES program under Award No. 1043876. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Questions?

More Related