1 / 18

Guy Wormser LAL Orsay Tsukuba, March 24, 2010

Status of Project. Guy Wormser LAL Orsay Tsukuba, March 24, 2010. Warwick April 14,2009. Marcello A. Giorgi. 1. Which NP will be ??. Which NP will be ??. Which NP will be ??. Which NP will be ??. Which NP will be ??. Which NP will be ??. Which NP

Jims
Download Presentation

Guy Wormser LAL Orsay Tsukuba, March 24, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of Project Guy Wormser LAL Orsay Tsukuba, March 24, 2010 Warwick April 14,2009 Marcello A. Giorgi 1

  2. Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? Which NP will be ?? The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade The actors in the next decade Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br (Bs mm) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br,ACP (B Xs l l) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) Br (B Xsg) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) NMFV (1-3) MFV MFV MFV MFV MFV MFV MFV MFV MFV Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) Br (K0 p0nn) b b b b b b b b b MFV-GUT MFV-GUT MFV-GUT MFV-GUT MFV-GUT MFV-GUT MFV-GUT MFV-GUT MFV-GUT Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (m e g) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) Br (B tn , mu) RH-currents RH-currents RH-currents RH-currents RH-currents RH-currents RH-currents RH-currents RH-currents NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) NMFV (2-3) (g - 2)m (g - 2)m (g - 2)m (g - 2)m (g - 2)m (g - 2)m (g - 2)m (g - 2)m (g - 2)m H+ - high tanb H+ - high tanb H+ - high tanb Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) Br (K+ p+nn) H+ - high tanb H+ - high tanb H+ - high tanb H+ - high tanb H+ - high tanb H+ - high tanb Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (t  mmm) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) Br (B K nn) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) ACP (B Xsg) Z penguins Z penguins Z penguins Z penguins Z penguins Z penguins Z penguins Z penguins Z penguins LHT Models LHT Models LHT Models LHT Models LHT Models LHT Models LHT Models LHT Models LHT Models Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (B KSp0g) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) Br (t  mg) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f) ACP(BsJ/ y f)

  3. 2 Leptonic decay B  l n Today some >2s discrepancy.. MSSM 2HDM-II 75ab-1 2ab-1 LEP mH>79.3 GeV SuperB ATLAS 30fb−1 SuperB excludes SuperB excludes B-factories exclude B-factories exclude ATLAS 30fb−1 ATLAS 30fb−1

  4. Transverse Beam Profile Measurements CRAB OFF CRAB ON y = 398 m y = 143 m Nov. 2nd 2009 103 colliding bunches

  5. Beam-Beam Simulation of DAFNE (Ohmi) (Fall 2008)

  6. Simulations for SuperB (M. Zobov’s talk) Strong-Strong Weak-Strong Quasi-Strong-Strong K. Ohmi

  7. Latest Ring Layout C = 1323.03 m 60 mrad IR LER SR LER SR LER arc HER arc LER arc HER arc e+ Dogleg 140 mrad e- RF RF Y. Nosochkov et al.

  8. SuperB Site independent now can fit also @ LNF Polarization included LNF December 1,2009 Marcello A. Giorgi 8

  9. 1st Geological Survey

  10. 1st Geological Survey Modulator Hall Linac Tunnel Transfer Lines Super-B Tunnel

  11. Tor Vergata Site

  12. All lattices reuse PEP-II hardware components Total length 1800 m 20 m 280 m M. Biagini Dipoles Available Needed Quads Sexts All PEP-II magnets are reused. Dimensions and fields are properly sized.

  13. Machine Advisory Committee statement on Viability Mini-MAC now feels secure in enthusiastically encouraging the SuperB design team to proceed to the TDR phase, with confidence that the design parameters are achievable

  14. Detector Layout – Reuse parts of Babar (or Belle) BASELINE OPTION 28 Nov,2008 Marcello A.Giorgi 14 Warwick April 14,2009 Marcello A. Giorgi 14

  15. Towards SuperB approval May 2008, Physics case positively reviewed by IRC Sep 2008 Presentation to CERN Council (European Strategy session) Nov 2008 : ECFA report Dec 2008 : SuperB TDR phase approved by INFN. Regional government votes 5M€/year support for TDR preparation 15 Feb 2009 Official launch of the TDR Phase in Orsay March 9 2009 : Interview of the Italian Minister of Research (after a visit to Frascati and CERN) : Plan to support research to be presented at the next G8 meeting includes a « machina » to be built in Italy to attract international researchers March 20, 2009: Large European Laboratory directors meeting : unanimous support for SuperB TDR April 24, 2009 : Report from the Machine Advisory Committee September 2009 Cern council recognizes that SuperB is integral part of the European Strategy October 2009 : SuperB is the first priority of the Italian Ministry of Research to be included in the Italian Stimulus Package March 2010 Discussions are taking place between Ministry of Research and Ministry of Economy on HOW to fund SuperB Ministry of Research is preparing a Research Infrastructure National Plan with imminent release

  16. The next steps Encouraging statement from Italian governement is expected ANY MOMENT Bilateral MoUs to be signed between INFN and international partners « White paper » document describing the SuperB baseline for machine and detecteor available in one month TDR finished in Spring 2011 Groundbreaking start hoped in 2011,

  17. International participation US DoE asked SLAC to evaluate 3 scenarios with increasing US participation. Decision due early 2010 France SuperB TDR participation approved at IN2P3 scientific Council in June 2009 IRFU/CEA, LAL, LAPP, LPSC, LPNHE collaboration Poland Krakow group recently joined (KIT, Krakow Univ) Canada U. of Victoria group approved by IPP UK, Spain Many contacts and discussions

  18. Conclusions Flavor physics presents an very exciting opportunity to understand new physics uncovered at the LHC LCHb and SuperB factory are very complementary tools. A superb new idea to build a machine of unprecedented luminosity. Tests at DAFNE demonstrated the concept! Machine Advisory Committee endorsed the machine feasability. There is a real chance that a SuperB project be approved in Europe very vigorously pushed by the Italian government TDR phase now in full steam, To be completed by Spring 2011 Important synergy with ILC key elements Expected first beams in 2015….

More Related