470 likes | 736 Views
The Business and the Financing Plan for the Project. Financial Modeling and Evaluation ... Financing plan is a distinctive part of the business plan and contain ...
E N D
ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES FACULTY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS The Business and the Financing Plan for the Project. Financial Modeling and Evaluation Lecture 6: Lect. Cristian PĂUN
The business and financing plan definition • Business plan is a picture or a model of what a business unit will be. • Business plan contains information on: • product(s) • markets • employees • technology, facilities • capital, revenues and profitability • Financing plan is a distinctive part of the business plan and contain a detailed presentation of: • Borrowing capacity • Sources of financial funds; • Cost analysis for each source; • WACC analysis; • Discounted Cash Flow Analysis; • Presentation of Financial Forecast • Income Statements • Balance Sheets • Statements of Cash Flows
Why a business and financing plan ? • To get help from others, especially financial funds providers (banks, equity investors); • To convince the sponsors, banks and other creditworthiness parties that the project will be a successful one. • Provides a guide for running operations once the project is started. • Incidental benefit: Pulls the participants and management team together and forces owners/managers to fully understand the tasks ahead of them
Contents Executive Summary Mission Statement Market Background The Customers Product Description Competitive Analysis Pricing Operations Sources of Input/Costs Processes / Equipment Management/Staffing Financial Projections Current Statements Projected Statements Application for Funds Contingency Planning Appendices Business Plan Outline
Financing Plan Objectives • Designing the optimal financing plan for a project generally involves the following objectives: • Ensuring the availability of sufficient financial resources to complete the project; • Obtaining the necessary funds at the lowest practicable cost; • Minimizing the project sponsors exposure to the project; • Establishing a dividend policy that maximize the rate of return for the sponsor’s equities; • Maximizing the value of tax benefits for the project ownerships; • Obtaining the most beneficial regulatory treatment.
Financing plan components • Borrowing Capacity of the project; • Project ability to service the debt; • Financing Sources Table; • WACC Analysis; • Discounted Cash Flow Analysis; • Income Statement; • Balance sheet; • Cash Flow Statement;
Financial Modeling Inputs • Macroeconomic assumptions; • Project costs and funding structure • Operating revenues and costs; • Loan drawings and debt service; • Taxation and accounting.
Financial Modeling Outputs • Construction phase costs; • Drawdown of equity; • Drawdown and repayment of debt; • Interest calculation; • Operating revenues and costs; • Tax; • Income statement; • Balance Sheet; • Cash Flow Statement; • Lender’s coverage ratio.
Main steps for financial modeling • Macroeconomic assumption; • Project costs and funding structure; • Operating revenues and costs; • Borrowing capacity; • Capacity to cover debt service; • Taxation and accounting. • WACC; • IRR and NPV for the project;
Step 1: Macroeconomic assumption Targets: • Inflation • Commodity prices • Interest rates; • Exchange rates; • GDP Growth; • Other macroeconomic aspects (ex: traffic)
Step1.1. Inflation Analysis • Offer a “real” basis for the project; • In the analysis could be used different indicators: • Consumer price inflation in the Host Country; • Indices of employment costs in the country of suppliers or providers of services; • Industrial price inflation for the cost of spare parts; • Specific price indices for commodities produced or purchased by the project.
Step 1.2. Commodity prices • It referrers not to the inflation but to the vulnerability of the project to cyclical movements in commodity prices. • The projects are developed when commodity prices are high, and assume that these prices will continue to remain at least at this level. • Commodity prices may be very violent on a short term basis.
Step 1.3. Interest rates • Interest rates factors; • Interest rates components; • Nominal interest rate vs real interest rate. Step 1.4. Exchange rates The approaches: • Traditional theory; • PPP Theory; • Monetary approach; • IPP Theory. + Step 1.5. GDP Growth
Step 2: Project Costs and funding • Project costs: • Development costs: stuff and other travel costs to develop the project; • Development fees: taxes paid for the location, concessions; • Project Company costs: • Personnel costs; • Office and equipment; • Costs for permits and licenses; • Construction supervision; • Training and mobilization costs. • Construction price; • Construction insurance; • Star-up costs: • Fuel or raw materials; • Initial spare parts; • Working capital covering: • Initial inventories; • Office and personnel costs; • The first operating insurance premium.
Project Costs and funding • Project costs (cont.): • Taxes: VAT or other sales taxes; • Financing costs: • Loan arrangements and underwriting fees; • Loan and security registration costs; • Costs of lender’s advisers; • Interest during construction; • Commitment fees; • Loan agency costs. • Funding of Reserves Accounts; • Contingency (provisions for unexpected events).
Operating revenues and costs • Operating revenues from sales of product • Operating costs: • Cost of fuel or raw materials; • Personnel and office costs; • Maintenance costs; • Insurance costs. Accounting and taxation issues • Capitalization and depreciation of the project costs; • The dividends; • Tax payments and accountings
Project funding • The required ratio between equity and debt; • The borrowing capacity of the project; • The capacity of the project to service the debt; • For each financial source should be made an amortization table: • Principals; • Interest payments; • Annuities. • The priority of drawing between equity and debt; • Any limitation of the use of debt; • A drawdown schedule for both equity and debt; • WACC Analysis.
Borrowing Capacity Model for a Project Hypothesis A: Full drawdown of capital in the moment of full completion • The amount the bank will lend to a project entity should equal a fraction of the present value – PV of the available cash flows: α x D = PV Where: α – is the target cash flow coverage ratio D – the maximum loan amount PV – present value of future cash flows • PV is calculated from the cash flow projection for the project; • The projection of cash flows is based on a preliminary estimation of: • R – cash revenues during the first year; • E – cash expenses during the first year; • The rates (gE and gR) at which revenues and expenses are growing during the period of the project debt is contracting.
Borrowing Capacity Model for a Local Project The cash flow available for debt service for year t is: (1-T) x [R(1+gR)t-1 – E(1+gE)t-1-C] + C = (1-T) x [R(1+gR)t-1 – E(1+gE)t-1] + TC
Borrowing Capacity Model for a Local Project Taking into consideration the initial assumption: α x D = PV We can obtain the value for the revenues that can cover a desired loan amount – D: Where: - “i” is the interest rate of the debt; - “N” is life of the loan measured from the date of completion.
Example: Calculation of a Project’s Borrowing capacity Initial Assumption Task: - you should determine what is the total debt that the project is capable to support
Borrowing Capacity – Assumption 1 Formula for PV: The answer is: PV = 1.488.691 Euro D* = 992.461 Euro The debt capacity of the project is 992.461 Euro based on an estimated present value of the cash flows in value of 1.488.691 Euro.
Example: Calculation of a Project’s Borrowing capacity Assumption 2: a lower debt level for the project Task: - you should determine what is the minimum value for cash revenues in order to cover a debt of 700.000 Euro
Borrowing Capacity – Assumption 2 Formula for R: The answer is: Cash Revenues = 2.614.542 Euro The minimum cash revenues that can support a debt of 700.000 Euro is R = 2.614.542 Euro. A lower debt level (700.000 Euro instead 992.461 Euro) involves a lower level of cash revenues for the project.
Example: Calculation of a Project’s Borrowing capacity Assumption 3:a lower growth rate for cash revenues Task: - you should determine what is the minimum value for cash revenues in order to cover a debt of 700.000 Euro.
Borrowing Capacity – Assumption 3 Formula for R in case of different growth rates for cash revenues and expenses and C=0: The answer is: Cash Revenues = 2.869.381 Euro The minimum cash revenues that can support a debt of 700.000 Euro is R = 2.869.381 Euro. A lower growth rate for the cash revenues (than cash expenses) involves a higher level of cash revenues for the project in order to maintain the same debt level.
Borrowing Capacity Model for a Project Hypothesis B: The revenues and operating expenses do not begin for M years • The amount the bank will lend to a project entity should equal a fraction of the present value – PV of the available cash flows beginning with the year M: • The project company will draw a loan in the initial moment but the cash revenues and expenses are generated in a future moment M. • The present value of the project future cash flows should equal present value of the debt D drawn in the initial moment: M Construction phase Operating phase Drawing moment for the debt D α x D x (1+i)M = PV
Borrowing capacity for a project – Hypothesis B α x D x (1+i)M = PV
Example: Estimation of M Average life = 1.929 years = M This is the estimated period before the project produces any operating cash flows.
Example: Calculation of a Project’s Borrowing capacity Assumption 4: the project generates cash flows after 2 years Task: - you should determine what is the total debt that the project is capable to support
Example: Calculation of a Project’s Borrowing capacity Assumption 5: the project generates cash flows after 3 years Task: - you should determine what is the total debt that the project is capable to support
Project Ability to service the debt • To evaluate the project ability to service its debt usually it is used three main financial ratios: • Interest coverage ratio: ICR=EBIT / Interest • Fixed Charge Coverage ratio: FCCR=(EBIT + 1/3 rentals) / (Interest + 1/3 rentals) • Debt Service Coverage ratio:
Cost of International Financing Step 1: Determine the proportions of each source to be raised as capital. Step 2: Determine the marginal cost of each source. Step 3: Calculate the weighted average cost of capital. Current Yield = Current Yield = 9.04%
Present Value, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return IRR = k NPV = 0 • Inflation rate • Interest rate • Estimated profit for an investment project Expectations in terms of Discounted rate
Present Value, Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return Conclusion 1: Internal Rate of Return is the best measure for the marginal cost of international financing (real cost is 17.80 instead 10% or 8.89%)
Comparing credits in different currencies using NPV • Method I: • Estimating k(euro) • Estimating k(USD) • NPVeuro x spot0 = NPVeuroUSD
Comparing credits in different currencies using NPV • Method II: • Estimating k(euro) • Estimating exchange rate • Transforming An from USD in € • Comparing NPV
Comparing credits in different currencies using NPV • Method III (best accuracy): • Estimating k(euro) • Estimating k(USD) • Estimating an average FX rate • Transforming NPV from USD in € • Comparing NPV
Comparing credits in different currencies using IRR Method I: Comparing IRR obtained on initial An expressed in different currencies We have the same IRR (= 17.8%) Method II: Transforming An from USD to Euro and calculating IRR We have different IRR:
NPV Criteria in International Financing • Easier to be calculated than IRR • It is difficult to estimate different discount rates for different financial markets; • We should take into consideration the exchange rate when we compare different NPVs; • NPV encourage big investment projects and discourage big financing projects. IRR Criteria in International Financing • Independent from FX rate; • It is quite complicated to be estimated; • In some cases we can’t calculate it (symmetric annuities, positive annuities). CONCLUSION 2: When compare different financing alternatives we should use both two criteria: NPV and IRR
Cost of Equity • Scenario A: • Buy – back of stocks after 5 years: NPV = 0 Kstocks Scenario B: no buy - back Kstocks = (D0/IP)+g (Gordon – Shapiro Model)
International Financing Plan - summary WACC = 13.27%