530 likes | 624 Views
Delve into the debate between psychiatry and anti-psychiatry movements, exploring their origins, criticisms, and potential solutions for mental health practices. Learn about key figures such as David Cooper, RD Laing, and Thomas Szasz, and their differing views on mental illness and psychiatric treatment. Discover how critical psychiatry seeks to avoid the extremes of anti-psychiatry while promoting self-criticism and reflective practice in addressing mental disorders. This comprehensive overview sheds light on the complexities of mental health theories and practices.
E N D
Is critical psychiatry the same as “anti-psychiatry”? D B Double
David Cooper (1931-1986) • Psychiatry and anti-psychiatry (1967)
David Cooper (1931-1986) • Psychiatry and anti-psychiatry (1967) • “[P]sychiatry … has aligned itself far too closely with the alienated needs of society”
David Cooper (1931-1986) • Villa 21 – an experiment in anti-psychiatry
David Cooper (1931-1986) • Villa 21 – an experiment in anti-psychiatry • Positive non-action, “an effort to cease interference, to ‘lay off’ other people and give them and oneself a chance”
Definition by mainstream psychiatry • International movement against psychiatry which is “anti-medical, anti-therapeutic, anti-institutional and anti-scientific” (Roth, 1973)
Definition by mainstream psychiatry • International movement against psychiatry which is “anti-medical, anti-therapeutic, anti-institutional and anti-scientific” (Roth, 1973) • Generally seen as a passing phase in the history of psychiatry
RD Laing (1927-1989) • Not an anti-psychiatrist
RD Laing (1927-1989) • Not an anti-psychiatrist • Athough agreed with anti-psychiatric thesis that “by and large psychiatry functions to exclude and repress those elements society wants excluded and repressed”
RD Laing (1927-1989) • Madness is much more understandable than commonly assumed
RD Laing (1927-1989) • Madness is much more understandable than commonly assumed • So-called normality is too often an abdication of our true potentialities
Thomas Szasz (1920-) • Not an anti-psychiatrist
Thomas Szasz (1920-) • Not an anti-psychiatrist, although also not a “psychiatrist”, as psychiatry is associated with coercion
Thomas Szasz (1920-) • Not an anti-psychiatrist, although also not a “psychiatrist”, as psychiatry is associated with coercion • “Because both the anti-psychiatrists and I oppose certain aspects of psychiatry, our views are combined and confused”
Thomas Szasz (1920-) • Mental illness is a myth, as disease is physical
Thomas Szasz (1920-) • Mental illness is a myth, as disease is physical • State should not interfere in mental health practice or medicine in general
The “anti” element in anti-psychiatry • Psychiatry objectifies people and therefore becomes part of the problem rather than the solution to mental health problems
The “anti” element in anti-psychiatry • Psychiatry objectifies people and therefore becomes part of the problem rather than the solution to mental health problems • May have gone too far in abandoning notion of mental pathology
Excesses of anti-psychiatry • Cooper and Laing ultimately more interested in personal authenticity than changing psychiatry
Excesses of anti-psychiatry • Cooper and Laing ultimately more interested in personal authenticity than changing psychiatry • Few would want to go as far as Szasz in proposing no mental health law
Excesses of anti-psychiatry • Cooper and Laing ultimately more interested in personal authenticity than changing psychiatry • Few would want to go as far as Szasz in proposing no mental health law • Cooper’s excursion into family, sexual and revolutionary politics
Critical psychiatry • Does not deny its roots in anti-psychiatry
Critical psychiatry • Does not deny its roots in anti-psychiatry • Seeks to avoid excesses of anti-psychiatry and polarisation in the debate about nature of mental disorder
Critical psychiatry • Psychiatry can be practised without the justification of postulating brain pathology as the basis for mental illness
Critical psychiatry • Psychiatry can be practised without the justification of postulating brain pathology as the basis for mental illness • Minds are enabled but not reducible to brains
Critical psychiatry • Psychiatry can be practised without the justification of postulating brain pathology as the basis for mental illness • Minds are enabled but not reducible to brains • Genes set the boundaries of the possible; environments define the actual
Encouraging self-criticism • Inclined to find fault, or to judge with severity
Encouraging self-criticism • Inclined to find fault, or to judge with severity • Characterised by careful, exact evaluation and judgement
Encouraging self-criticism • Inclined to find fault, or to judge with severity • Characterised by careful, exact evaluation and judgement • Of the greatest importance to the way things might happen
Reflective practice • Preparedness to think critically
Reflective practice • Preparedness to think critically • Tolerate the uncertainty and ambiguity required during reflection
Reflective practice • Preparedness to think critically • Tolerate the uncertainty and ambiguity required during reflection • Ability to think about own thinking processes and critically assess assumptions and beliefs
Critical theory • Loose collection of theories critical of society and the human sciences
Critical theory • Loose collection of theories critical of society and the human sciences • Frankfurt Institute for Social Research
Critical theory • Rational basis of social existence theoretically impossible
Critical theory • Rational basis of social existence theoretically impossible • Systems of collective beliefs legitimate various power structures
Scientific basis of critical psychiatry • Critique of science as positivism
Scientific basis of critical psychiatry • Critique of science as positivism • Interpretation important in establishing “facts”
Scientific basis of critical psychiatry • Corporate interests are compromising objective research
Scientific basis of critical psychiatry • Corporate interests are compromising objective research • Bias in interpretation of randomised controlled trials
Conclusion • Mental disorders are not brain diseases
Conclusion • Mental disorders are not brain diseases • Psychiatrist is agent of social control
Conclusion • Mental disorders are not brain diseases • Psychiatrist is agent of social control • Mental disorders must show through the brain but not always in the brain