160 likes | 336 Views
The Long Road To Personal Automobile Insurance Reform In New Jersey March 2006. Bernie Flynn Senior Vice President & General Counsel NJM Insurance Group. New Jersey Automobile Insurance History – 1970s. No-Fault System adopted in 1972
E N D
The Long Road To Personal Automobile Insurance Reform In New JerseyMarch 2006 Bernie Flynn Senior Vice President & General Counsel NJM Insurance Group
New Jersey Automobile Insurance History – 1970s • No-Fault System adopted in 1972 • Residual Market/Assigned Risk mechanism grew to cover 1.2 million drivers (one out of every four) • Tight regulatory control over rate setting • Companies began to exit the market, including GEICO and Nationwide
New Jersey Automobile Insurance History – 1980s • Overburdened Assigned Risk Plan replaced by a Joint Underwriting Association (the “JUA”) in 1982 • 15 servicing carriers with no risk of loss managed the policies of the JUA • JUA drivers were charged voluntary market level rates and it was lucrative for agents to dump risks there • By 1988, about 50% of NJ’s drivers (over 2 million) were insured through the JUA and the financial deficit approximated $3.3 billion
The Fair Automobile Insurance Reform Act of 1990 (FAIR Act) • Jim Florio elected Governor on the promise of: • Getting rid of the JUA • Eliminating the $222 per car Residual Market Equalization Charge (RMECs) imposed on all NJ drivers to subsidize the JUA • Generally reforming the auto insurance system
The 1990 FAIR Act • $3.3 billion deficit paid by: • Surcharges and assessments imposed on insurers, hundred of millions which could not be passed through to policyholders • Increased Motor Vehicle Fees • Assessments on doctors, lawyers and body shops • Aggressive depopulation of JUA mandated - 40,000 drivers absorbed into the voluntary market each month for four years. • JUA became the Market Transition Facility (MTF) for two years (and ran up an additional $1 billion in debt) until new Assigned Risk Plan implemented (PAIP) • Take-All-Comers requirement instituted • Insurer Lock-In-Law very restrictive
1997 Automobile Insurance Reform • Governor Whitman eliminated the flex rating system instituted by the FAIR Act (which served to keep carriers afloat during the depopulation of the JUA/MTF) • Flex rating was replaced by an expedited rating mechanism for increases up to 3% on average – to be implemented by the Department of Insurance regulation • Urban Enterprise Zone program mandated – shifted drivers from carriers top heavy with urban risks to carriers which did not have urban market shares equivalent to or higher than their suburban market shares • Surcharge programs eliminated, tier rating programs authorized • Nonrenewals restricted
1998 Automobile Insurance Reforms – Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA) • AICRA became law on May 19, 1998: • Required a mandatory 15% average rate reduction for full coverage policies • Authorized the creation of the Office of the Insurance Fraud Prosecutor • Set forth a new Verbal Threshold intended to eliminate lawsuits for non-serious, non-permanent injuries • Provided for new PIP system permitting utilization review and establishing medical protocols for treatment of common auto injuries • Directed that rating territories be redrawn and the 35% cap imposed on certain urban territories be lifted
Auto Rate Regulation In New Jersey = Strangulation • July 1, 1997 Governor Whitman issued a press release after repealing the flex rate law declaring a “Rate Freeze” • From 07/01/97 until 11/06/01 • Expedited rate making process not adopted by Department • 65 prior approval rate filings made • 6 average rate decreases approved • 4 average rate increases approved
Shock Waves • April 6, 2001 – Commissioner declared State Farm’s NJ subsidiary to be in hazardous financial condition • Largest personal auto writer in NJ with 17% of the market (850,000 insured vehicles) relieved of: • Take-All-Comers obligation • PAIP assignments • UEZ requirements • June 12, 2001 – State Farm filed to withdraw from the NJ auto market • June 15, 2001 – AIG’s subsidiary (200,000 insured vehicles) followed suit and filed to withdraw
The Seeds of Change • November 6, 2001 – Jim McGreevey elected Governor • Don Bryan – Acting Commissioner • Following election: • Necessary prior approval rate increase requests approved • Expedited rate regulations finally adopted (up to 3% on average) • Holly Bakke appointed Commissioner in early 2002
Momentum For Regulatory Reform • Commitment by Governmental Leaders to improve market • Effective Lobbying and Grass Roots Campaign by Industry • Typical political concerns about the price of auto insurance overwhelmed by the inability of many NJ drivers to find coverage • Availability crisis dominated the debate
Automobile Insurance Competition and Choice Act of 2003 (May) • Rate Reform • Expedited Rate Process expanded from 3% to 7% • Relaxation of some Prior Approval requirements • Excess Profits made less onerous, but not eliminated • Three-year look back period moved to seven years • Withdrawal (Lock-In-Law) restrictions loosened • Take-All-Comers to be eliminated over a five-year transition period.
Market Developments • Expedited Rate Process working as designed • Mercury General enters market – August 2003 • Credit Scoring permitted for Mercury General immediately – opened to industry use in 2004 • GEICO enters market – August 2004 • State Farm begins writing new business – January 2005 • AIG begins writing new business – 2004/2005 • Progressive enters market – October 2005
Remaining Issues • No-Fault Cost Drivers • Tight Michigan-like Verbal Threshold weakened by June 2005 NJ Supreme Court decision • Since 2001 there has been no Physician PIP Fee Schedule and NJ has never had a Hospital Fee Schedule • PIP Medical Costs are out of control • The Department continues to impose urban territorial rate caps • AICRA of 1998 authorized reform of rating territories – still not implemented
February 27, 2006The Newark Star Ledger "GEICO's two rates:White-collar and blue-collar" Legislator vows to ban practice of using education and occupation to underwrite and price risks