1 / 14

Welcome to PLDI 2009

Welcome to PLDI 2009. General chair: Michael Hind Program chair: Amer Diwan Tutorial chair: Kim Hazelwood Workshops chair: Ranjit Jhala FIT chair: Rodric Rabbah Student research chair: Marco Pistoia Local arrangements chair: David Gregg. Attendance Trends (as of June 18, 2009).

LionelDale
Download Presentation

Welcome to PLDI 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Welcome to PLDI 2009 • General chair: Michael Hind • Program chair: Amer Diwan • Tutorial chair: Kim Hazelwood • Workshops chair: RanjitJhala • FIT chair: RodricRabbah • Student research chair: Marco Pistoia • Local arrangements chair: David Gregg

  2. Attendance Trends(as of June 18, 2009)

  3. PLDI Attendance BreakdownRegular vs. Student

  4. Program Committee Analyzed recent trends to identify areas; picked top people in proportion to the areas

  5. New in PLDI 2009 • External Review Committee (ERC) • 51 members (printed proceedings are missing names) • Nominated by program committee as experts in their own areas • Bid on papers—just like the program committee • Inspired by ISMM 2008

  6. Paper Submission • Double blind without compromising paper • Authors could submit TRs etc. which I forwarded to reviewers as needed • Authors could reveal their identity in their rebuttal if needed • Authors indicated conflicts with PC and ERC members

  7. Paper Reviewing • 196 paper submissions (a record!) • 3 PC and 1 ERC members reviewed each paper • X reviews: 310 • Y reviews: 371 • Z reviews: 110 • Obtained additional external reviews if a paper had too few X/Y reviews

  8. Rebuttal/Discussion Period • 10 days between rebuttal due date and PC meeting • I acted on three categories: • Not enough expert reviewsObtained additional reviews • Strongly conflicting reviews (AD)Initiated online discussion~180 messages total • Strong review was externalInitiated online discussion

  9. PC Meeting (1) • 2 full days in Boulder, CO • 100% attendance • Accepted 41 papers

  10. PC Meeting (2) • Used “Identify the Champion” • Discussed every paper with an “A” • PC members could resurrect any paper • And did! • Michael Hind and Todd Mytkowicz took detailed notes, managed time, … • Jens Palsberg subbed for me or Mike

  11. Acceptance Statistics

  12. Acceptance by Area

  13. Special Thanks • Lisa Tolles at Sheridan • Paolo and Rich, start submission software • Mike Hind and Todd Mytkowicz • PC and ERC members • Authors

  14. Announcements • Distinguished paper award after last session • Enjoy

More Related