180 likes | 396 Views
Value-Added: Some Clarification. Presented by: Keston H. Fulcher, Ph.D. Christopher Newport University Virginia Assessment Group 3/2/2007 Note: Thanks to Dr. John T. Willse (UNC-G) for help with this presentation. Overview. What is Value-Added? Context: Historical and Current Affairs
E N D
Value-Added: Some Clarification Presented by: Keston H. Fulcher, Ph.D. Christopher Newport University Virginia Assessment Group 3/2/2007 Note: Thanks to Dr. John T. Willse (UNC-G) for help with this presentation.
Overview • What is Value-Added? • Context: Historical and Current Affairs • Approaches to Assessing Value-Added • Misconceptions of Value-Added • Reservations
Value-Added: What Is It? • Value-Added is an analytical strategy to determine the degree to which students change from the beginning to the end of a program. Astin (1985) referred to this type of change as talent development.
Historical Context • 80s – Greater call for accountability for higher education regarding student learning; value-added was considerable part of discussion. • A few states embraced value-added (e.g., Missouri and Tennessee) • 90s early 00s – De-emphasis on value-added, more emphasis on minimum competency • Mid 00s – Value-added once again at center of general education discussions
Current Context (National) • Catalyst? • Spellings Commission • Recommendations (U.S. Department of Education, 2006) : • “Higher education institutions should measure student learning using quality assessment data.” • “The results of student learning assessments, including value-added measurements that indicate how much students’ skills have improved over time, should be made available to students and reported in the aggregate publicly.”
Current Context (National) • Spellings Commission is considering logistical issues. • NASULGC and AACSU are working on developing recommendations for a “Voluntary Accountability System.” • The College Learning Assessment (CLA) is recommended by many groups to assess student gains in higher-order learning.
Current Context (Virginia) • Core Competency Assessment – State Council advocating value-added assessment for student learning. • Assessment of Student Learning Task Force charged by State Council to work out logistics. Initially, all members assessment experts. • This task force now is composed of presidents, provosts, and three assessment experts.
Whoa! • Several issues here; value-added is just one of those issues. • Let’s examine just value-added.
Approaches to Value-Added • Cross-Sectional • Pre-Post • Residual Analysis
Cross-Sectional • Cross-Sectional: Compare scores from (say) sample of seniors against sample of freshmen on same test. • Note: Weakest of three designs; doesn’t control for differences between samples.
Pre-Post • Pre-Post: Same set of students takes same test or equivalent tests at two points in time (i.e., repeated measures). • Change scores represent value-added. • Note: Conceptually most straight-forward approach to value-added. Takes considerable time to collect difference scores.
Residual Analysis • Residual Analysis: Determined by comparing the difference between actual scores and the scores predicted by some variable (or a set of variables), usually SATs or ACTs - Approach used by CLA • Note: Logistically easier to implement but conceptually a bit off-target. Value-added from this approach is normative.
Misconceptions of Value-Added • Misconception: Measuring change is always unreliable • In the context of pre-post design, five conditions must hold for change scores to be unreliable (Zumbo, 1999): • the correlation between testing occasion one and testing occasion two is a large positive value • the observed variance of the two testing occasions is equal • the true score variance at both occasions is equal • the reliability at both occasions is equal, and • the correlation between true scores and true change scores is negative.
Other Misconceptions • Value-Added means standardized assessment across institutions. • Value-Added is the CLA instrument. • Any instrument could theoretically be used for value-added assessment.
Reservations of Value-Added • Affected by attrition • Expensive (especially for pre-post) • Item memorization • Doesn’t answer all analytical questions
Value-Added, Summary • Some limitations • Answers a great question • In terms of the national debate about standardized testing across the nation… • We should be clear. Are we actually criticizing value-added, or an instrument, or standardization across schools….???
References • Astin A. W. (1985). Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. • U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, D.C. Also available at http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/pre-pub-report.pdf • Zumbo, B. D. (1999). The simple difference score as an inherently poor measure of change: Some reality, much mythology. In Bruce Thompson (Ed.). Advances in Social Science Methodology, Volume 5, (pp. 269-304). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.