E N D
1. S. A. F. E.Lifting Program(Safe Accident Free Environment) Mary Doherty, RN, BSN
Tabitha Sheen,RN, MSN, APRN-BC
3. Injuries on the job…how RN’s get hurt:
4. How much do Nurse’s lift? Restas reported (2000) that in an 8 hour shift, the cummulative weight that clinical staff lift is equal to an average of 1.8 tons per day!
5. Nursing Injury and the Nursing Shortage In an ANA survey (2001), 87.9% of nurses said that health and safety concerns influenced decisions to stay in nursing.
In a poll conducted by New Jersey local of 1199, 18% of CNAs leave the profession due to back injuries
2001 rate of nursing injury of 8.5% in hospitals and 13.2% in LTC far exceeds private industry’s rate of 6.3%
6. A Nurse speaks… “Four of my colleagues-good critical care nurses-can no longer work in critical care because of back injuries. We miss them… we need them”
-Nurse Practitioner at a large medical center, 2002.
7. The Hidden Costs of Back & Shoulder Injuries Visible Portion of Iceberg: Direct Costs
Medical
Compensation
Larger portion hidden below the water’s surface: Indirect Costs
Wage on Modified Duty
Wage of Replacement / OT
Training of New Employee
Morale
Loss of Efficiency to HC team
8. Mission To decrease the cost, incidence, and optimize the treatment associated with low back pain for Aurora employees.
9. Phase I Activities Pre-placement testing for all physically demanding positions to assess physical ability to perform essential job functions
Education at time of hire, orientation, on-going
Supervisor training for early reporting of injuries
Case Management of injuries
ED Physician/Staff training about early return to work philosophy
10. Phase II Prevention from an engineering perspective needed to be addressed!
11. A gap analysis of lifting equipment was conducted Arjo assessed the hospitals for:
Types of lifts currently available
Types of lifts needed
Location of lifts and storage issues
Types of patients cared for on each unit
Costs/potential savings
12. Costs and potential savings were presented to Management, including finance, for their approval
13. Analyzing direct and indirect costs for savings projections and investment return:
14. Before the final decision was made to use Arjo/Diligent as our vendor: Comparison was made to another company specializing in lifting equipment
Site visit to a large medical center to actually see the equipment in use, talk to staff and review their outcomes
Equipment fair was held by both vendors for clinical staff to check out the equipment and provide feedback
15. Overwhelming theme on the evaluations was that employees were glad to be getting some equipment to aid them and didn’t have a strong preference for either vendor. Aurora choose Arjo for several reasons:
The equipment seemed to be more user-friendly
Arjo offers the Diligent Clinical Services which guarantees the 60% reduction in number of patient handling injuries.
16. Implementing a Minimal Lift/Transfer Program
17. For a 600+ bed hospital, we had:
18. The purchase of equipment is the easy part, the fun has just begun . . .
20. Implementation Plan
21. Requires a Team Effort Leadership
Employee Health
Infection Control
Clinical Engineering
Maintenance
Central Supply
Laundry
22. Initial Strategy Trained approximately 1800 employees: nursing staff, transporters, & therapists
Phased in equipment over 3 month period which coincided with training
Training:
Transfer Mobility Coaches received 8 hours of training
“General” staff received 3 hours of training, which included return demonstration of equipment use
Classes were held Monday thru Friday 0730 –2300; sometimes with concurrent sessions
23. Ongoing Coaching Learn by experience
Monthly visits by Diligent consultant
Continuing Education of TMCs
TMCs train new employees
24. Lessons Learned: Need a core group to assume responsibility for implementing and addressing ongoing issues
Importance of having good working relationship with consultants
Will require “gentle pressure relentlessly applied”
Celebrate your successes
25. Outcomes Pre-implementation data
7 months after implementation:
*Does not include injuries that occurred from failure to use equipment.
26. Indirect Outcomes Improved staffing
Improved morale
Assists in maintaining “Magnet” status
Retention of staff who may have been injured or may not have been able to keep up with the physical demands of the profession (aging population)
Recruitment tool
Pt satisfaction