210 likes | 600 Views
Two-way ANOVA. Chapter 14. Factorial Designs. Simple one-way designs don’t capture the complexity of human behavior; our behavior is the result of many different influences The variables can have unique effects or can combine with other variables to have a combined effect
E N D
Two-way ANOVA Chapter 14
Factorial Designs • Simple one-way designs don’t capture the complexity of human behavior; our behavior is the result of many different influences • The variables can have unique effects or can combine with other variables to have a combined effect • Allow for greater generalizability of results • Efficient and cost-effective • Move beyond the one-way ANOVA which has 1 IV, to a two-way design which as 2IVs
Get information about the main effect of each IV as well as the interaction effect • Will be computing multiple F-ratios • Can be both between-subjects, both within subjects, or mixed design • 2 (levels of A) X 2 (levels of B) • 3 X 2, 2 X 4, ETC. • Each combination of factor A and factor B creates a cell (what we are comparing is the means of each cell)
Two-way Between-subjects ANOVA • Assumptions: • The cells contain independent samples • DV measures of interval or ratio scores are approximately normally distributed • The populations all have homogeneous variance • 2-way ANOVA – two main effects and an interaction
Main Effects • The main effect refers to the effect of that factor (I.e., the levels) collapsing across other factors (averaging across those levels) • For factor A compute the means for each column, ignoring factor B, which is represented by the rows • Essentially perform a one-way ANOVA for each main effect
Main Effects • For each main effect (determined by the number of IVs) you have a null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis • Compute Fobt called FA • If significant then graph the main effect means, perform post hoc comparisons, and determine the proportion of variance accounted for by factor A • Do the same for factor B, collapsing across factor A • May have different values for k and n for each factor
Interaction • Two-way interaction effect is the combined effects of the levels of factor A with the levels of factor B • Treat each cell in the study as a level of the interaction and compare the cell means • Assess the extent to which the cell means differ AFTER removing those differences between scores that are due to the main effects of factor A and B • Thus, differences due to the combination of A and B, not each separately
Interaction effect • The relationship between one factor and the DV change with, or depends on, the level of the other factor that is present • The influence of changing one factor is NOT the same for each level of the other factor • If the pattern is the same or the relationship is the same between the scores and one factor for each level of the other factor there is NOT an interaction
Hypotheses: for Interaction • Ho says that differences between scores due to A at one level of B equal the differences between scores due to A at the other level of B • Compute another separate F-ratio, graph the interaction, perform post hoc comparisons on cell means and compute the proportion of variance accounted for
Eysenck Study • Level-of processing (5 levels) and age differences (elderly may not process as deeply) • Thus, a 2 X 5 factorial design • 10 different groups of participants • Can assess interaction between age and encoding condition
Computations • The one-way ANOVA is the basis – a little more tedious because you have to compute a lot more • Compute MS total • MS within (average variability in the cells), still a reflection of the error variance; used as the denominator for all three F-ratios • Three sources of between-groups variance; three separate MS (factor A, factor B, and the interaction)
Computations continued • Compute appropriate SS then divide by appropriate df to get the MS