E N D
1. Value-added Primer
2. Accountability
FROM lagging indicators
TO leading indicators
FROM intellectual address
TO signposts on a journey
3. Students dont have value-added scores but teachers & schools do! Calculated as the value that is added to a students learning by working with a teacher and/or within a particular school.
Each student serves as his/her own control.
Past 2-3 years of a students performance are analyzed.
Sanders (BFK) model also calculates & includes an additional estimate to account for the effects (good or bad) of past teachers referred to as a layered model.
4. A conceptual overview of the general model.
5. Student Estimation Model The difference between each students estimated expected performance & their actual performance a residual variance is attributed to the effect of the teacher and school.
When these residuals are brought together, we can get a VALUE ADDED score for a teacher, a grade, a school, or a district. We group all the kids that are relevant for whatever slice of the educational picture we wish to see.
6. The Value of value-added ratings Because each value-added score is a measure of the actual teacher effect versus what the teacher effect was EXPECTED to be, it is in some ways content-neutral and grade-neutral. That is, we can talk about how effective any teacher is (per the test results anyway) in comparable fashion, making these ratings potentially very helpful in decisions about school improvement and teacher professional development support.
7. How do VA ratings tell us about what the teachers or schools are doing? Quintile Groupings
To get a better idea of how schools and teachers are doing with various groups of kids, the Sanders / BFK model breaks both kids and teachers into quintiles that is, chunks of 20% each, low to high
8. We cant estimate quintile performance for individual teachers, because the odds are good that s/he has 1) not enough students and 2) students clustered by ability quintiles, so that our estimates would be hard to interpret.
We DO have enough kids in a school, however, to look at quintile-based performance, and this is where we can examine the SCHOOL level choices of support for education.
9. Kids that are ALMOST but not quite passing the tests are about here
10. Often, we see grade levels or schools that are neglecting their very high or very low end kids in order to make accountability measures in the short term
11. Similarly, schools can do very well with all their kids, but have many still not pass exams.