180 likes | 477 Views
2. . . Current organisation Outline of the enforcement system in the European Union CESR-Fin current activitiesCESR-Fin priorities for 2008. . Index. 3. CESR-Fin - Current Organisation. CESR-Fin. . ARCAuRC. IASBIFRIC. EFRAG. . . . . . . . . Project groups . . European Enforcers Co-ordination Sessions EECS.
E N D
1. 1
IASCF Foundation
IFRS Conference, Amsterdam
Wednesday 25 June and Thursday 26 June 2008
CESR-Fin
Current activities
André Delger
Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM)
CESR-Fin
Committee of European Securities Regulators
2. 2
3. 3 CESR-Fin - Current Organisation
4. 4 Outline of the enforcement system in the European Union
5. 5 CESR-Fin current activities
Project on Fair value Accounting
Publication of enforcement decisions
Equivalence of 3rd country GAAPs
Transparency Directive - accounting and auditing issues
Prospectus Directive - accounting and auditing issues
6. 6 CESR takes steps to strengthen market confidence
New project approved by CESR Chairs 13 May 2008
Objective is to facilitate convergent interpretation in the application of fair value accounting
Measurement of illiquid complex financial instruments and related disclosures
Objective is to publish a CESR statement to be addressed to preparers, auditors and other interested parties as a first step
7. 7 The project will be split in two phases:
CESR statement
Fact finding exercise
CESR statement scheduled to be published for public consultation by summer 2008
Fact finding exercise has been discussed and will be reassessed when the CESR statement is published
Fact finding exercise on the application of mainly IFRS 7
Also other issues regarding fair value such as
contents of the management report
audit report (any qualifications or emphasis of matter paragraphs)
IAS 10 Events after the balance sheet date
IAS 27 – SIC 12 Consolidation and SPEs
8. 8 The project will only look into existing requirements
CESR will not assess whether the current requirements should be amended in any way
The project will cover both measurement and disclosure issues
As enforcers it is difficult to address measurement issues such as
Criteria to decide whether quoted prices in a particular market can be used for fair value measurement
Criteria to select inputs to valuation techniques
9. 9 CESR would like to obtain more information regarding measurement issues that arises in practice
CESR organised a workshop with market participants such as
Issuers – preparers from banks
National banking organisations
Analysts from credit rating agencies
Auditors with expertise on fair value measurement
Topics discussed are as mentioned the practical application of the requirements regarding fair value accounting
10. 10 A major part of the work with financial information in CESR is discussion of enforcement decisions taken at national level
Enforcement decisions taken on national level and discussed in CESR are published on a regular basis
The purpose of publishing enforcement decisions is to contribute to the promotion of market confidence and supervisory convergence of IFRS
Only decisions that do not deal with simple or obvious accounting matters or oversight of IFRS requirements will be published
11. 11 The decisions do not provide generally applicable interpretations of IFRS as this is the role of IFRIC
CESR published the 3rd package of enforcement decisions on May 19, 2008
The 3rd package contains 14 decisions
After publication of the 3rd package a total of 41 decisions taken on national level regarding enforcement of IFRS since 1 January 2005 have been published
12. 12 The European Commission seeks CESRs advice regarding the assessment of whether accounting requirements from specific 3rd countries can be considered as equivalent to IFRS as adopted in Europe
CESR responded to the first request from the Commission on US GAAP, Japanese GAAP and Chinese GAAP in March 2008
CESR has in May 2008 responded to the second request from the Commission regarding Canadian and South Korean GAAP
CESR recommends that both GAAPs can be accepted until 2011
CESR has also received a request to assess Indian GAAP
It has so far not been possible to obtain sufficient information about the current progress of transition to IFRS in India to produce a consultation document
13. 13 CESR conducted the first call for evidence of the implementation of the Transparency Directive during 2007
The outcome of the call for evidence was that market participants would like more information about the implementation in the member states
Especially on the use of options in the directive
CESR decided to form an expert group on the Transparency Directive – Transparency Expert Group
All market participants are welcome to submit questions to the interpretation of the directive to the Transparency Expert Group
14. 14 The Transparency Expert Group is dealing with
Mapping of the implementation of the directive
Discussing questions from various members regarding specific interpretations of articles in the directive –
Publish Q&A where there is consensus
The Transparency Expert Group has had 3 meetings so far
Concrete interpretations have mainly been regarding major holdings
Not published yet, as there have not been so many so far
The outcome of the mapping will be published in 2008
Individual answers from each member state to the questionnaire
A report summarizing the responses
15. 15 CESR publishes Q&A regarding interpretations of the prospectus directive and regulation
The issues regarding prospectuses and accounting and auditing have manly focused on pro forma information
All market participants are welcome to submit questions to the interpretation of the directive and the regulation to the Prospectus Contact Group
16. 16 The current issues regarding prospectuses and accounting and auditingissues are the following:
What is the required level of assurance for auditors reports in prospectuses?
Status: CESR believes that this issue should first be assessed by the auditors.
IAASB has started a project on “Assurance reports on Prospectus information”, where CESR has served as an observer in the preparation phase.
CESR will follow the project and participate in it, when IAASB requests us to do so
17. 17 Is there any conflict between the requirements in the prospectus directive regarding audit reports and the wording in the standard audit reports according to ISAs?
According to the prospectus Regulation annex II, the auditor should state in the auditors report that:
the pro forma financial information has been properly compiled on the basis stated;
basis is consistent with the accounting policies of the issuer.
18. 18