700 likes | 1.53k Views
Cardiology – Faculty of Medicine and Surgery University of Turin. Heart failure (3 of 3): treatment. Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai Division of Cardiology 1, Ospedale San Giovanni Battista “Molinette”, Turin, Italy gbiondizoccai@gmail.com – http://www.metcardio.org. Learning goals.
E N D
Cardiology – Faculty of Medicine and Surgery UniversityofTurin Heart failure(3 of 3): treatment Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai Division of Cardiology 1, Ospedale San Giovanni Battista “Molinette”, Turin, Italy gbiondizoccai@gmail.com – http://www.metcardio.org
Learning goals • Definition • Epidemiology • Pathophysiology • Diagnosis • Prognosis • Management
Learning goals • Management: • Prevention • Treatment with “ABCDE”: • Pharmacologic therapy • Non-pharmacologic therapy
Learning goals • Management: • Prevention • Treatment with “ABCDE”: • Pharmacologic therapy • Non-pharmacologic therapy
Learning goals • Management: • Prevention • Treatment with “ABCDE”: • Pharmacologic therapy • Non-pharmacologic therapy
Prevention • Addressing all primary causes of cardiac disease eventually leading to HF • Hypertension • Coronary heart disease • Valvular heart disease • Metabolic, toxic, or immunological heart disease
Learning goals • Management: • Prevention • Treatment with “ABCDE”: • Pharmacologic therapy • Non-pharmacologic therapy
Goals/means of treatment • Prognostic benefits vssymptomatic benefitsvssurrogate benefits • Correction of reversible causes: • Ischemia, valvular disease, thyrotoxicosis and other high output status, shunts, arrhythmias, medications • Palliation for irreversible damage
Survival Morbidity Exercise capacity Quality of life Neurohormonal changes Progression of CHF Symptoms Treatment objectives (Cost)
Prevention/Control of risk factors • Life style • Treat etiologic cause / aggravating factors • Drug therapy • Personal care. Team work • Revascularization if ischemia causes HF • ICD (Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator) • Ventricular resyncronization • Ventricular assist devices • Heart transplant • Artificial heart • Neoangiogenesis, Gene therapy Treatment strategies All Selected patients
Learning goals • Management: • Prevention • Treatment with “ABCDE”: • Pharmacologic therapy • Non-pharmacologic therapy
ABCDE approach for HF • A ACE-inhibitors, AII-antagonists, aldosterone-antagonists, anti-arrhythmics, anti- hypertensives, aspirin/anticoagulants • B beta-blockers • C cholesterol (statins), cardiac resynchronization (CRT), coronary PTCA/CABG, cardiac restoration, cardiac transplant • D daily weight, diet, diuretics, digoxin, defibrillators, (vaso)dilators • E exercise, (anything) else
ABCDE approach for HF • A ACE-inhibitors, AII-antagonists, aldosterone-antagonists, anti-arrhythmics, anti- hypertensives, aspirin/anticoagulants • B beta-blockers • C cholesterol (statins), cardiac resynchronization (CRT), coronary PTCA/CABG, cardiac restoration, cardiac transplant • D daily weight, diet, diuretics, digoxin, defibrillators, (vaso)dilators • E exercise, (anything) else
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-inhibitors) • Block the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin system by inhibiting the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II → ↑vasodilation and ↓Na+ retention • ↓bradykinin degradation ↑its level → ↑PG secretion & NO • Major anti-remodeling effects on myocardium and vessels • Mainstay in HF: they improve cardiac function, symptoms, and survival • Several agents: captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, perindopril, ramipril, zofenopril, … PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-inhibitors) 30 Asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction post MI Placebo n=1116 Mortality % 20 Captopril n = 2231 3 - 16 days post AMI EF < 40 12.5 - 150 mg / day n=1115 10 SAVE N Engl J Med 1992;327:669 p=0.019 0 0 3 4 1 2 Years
Angiotensin II antagonists • Comparable effect to ACE-inhibitors • Fewer side effects than ACE-inhibitors • Can be used in certain conditions when ACE-inhibitors are contraindicated (angioneurotic edema, cough) • May be combined with ACE-inhibitors, provided BP is ok, to possibly improve survival and definitely reduce hospitalizations • Commonly used agents: candesartan, losartan, valsartan PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Aldosterone antagonists • Block aldosterone receptors • Can be used in advanced HF, to further inhibit the R-A-A system after complete uptitration of ACE-inhibitors • Check often for risk of hyperkalemia • Available agents: spironolactone, potassium canrenoate, eplerenone PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0 6 12 24 30 36 18 Aldosterone antagonists Annual Mortality Aldactone 18%; Placebo 23% Survival N = 1663 NYHA III-IV Mean follow-up 2 y Aldactone p < 0.0001 Placebo months RALES NEJM 1999;341:709
Antiarrhythmics • Most common cause of sudden cardiac death in HF is ventricular tachyarrhythmia • Antiarrhythmic drugs may suppress PVC but may induce VT or VF!!! • Only amiodaronehas a reasonably safe profile in HF, but landmark SCD-HeFT Study has demonstrated no impact of amiodarone on prognosis • Remember the many toxic effects of amiodarone: • lung, thyroid, eye, liver SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Aspirin/oral anticoagulants • Aspirin is recommended in all patients with coronary heart disease, diabetes or any other established form of atherosclerotic disease, unless contraindicated by bleeding diathesis • Oral anticoagulants are recommended in patients with paroxysmal/permanent atrial fibrillation, or those with previous embolic events (eg in LV dysfunction) despite aspirin treatment PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT!
ABCDE approach for HF • A ACE-inhibitors, AII-antagonists, aldosterone-antagonists, anti-arrhythmics, anti- hypertensives, aspirin/anticoagulants • B beta-blockers • C cholesterol (statins), cardiac resynchronization (CRT), coronary PTCA/CABG, cardiac restoration, cardiac transplant • D daily weight, diet, diuretics, digoxin, defibrillators, (vaso)dilators • E exercise, (anything) else
Beta-blockers • Traditionally were contraindicated in HF • Now another mainstay in HF: • improved LV function and symptoms • Improved survival • The only contraindication is severe and truly decompensated HF • Agents approved for HF: bisoprolol, metoprolol, carvedilol PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Beta-blockers 100 90 80 Survival % Carvedilol 70 p=0.00014 35% RR N = 2289 III-IV NYHA 60 Placebo 50 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 COPERNICUS NEJM 2001;344:1651 Months
ABCDE approach for HF • A ACE-inhibitors, AII-antagonists, aldosterone-antagonists, anti-arrhythmics, anti- hypertensives, aspirin/anticoagulants • B beta-blockers • C cholesterol (statins), cardiac resynchronization (CRT), coronary PTCA/CABG, cardiac restoration, cardiac transplant • D daily weight, diet, diuretics, digoxin, defibrillators, (vaso)dilators • E exercise, (anything) else
ABCDE approach for HF • A ACE-inhibitors, AII-antagonists, aldosterone-antagonists, anti-arrhythmics, anti- hypertensives, aspirin/anticoagulants • B beta-blockers • C cholesterol (statins), cardiac resynchronization (CRT), coronary PTCA/CABG, cardiac restoration, cardiac transplant • D daily weight, diet, diuretics, digoxin, defibrillators, (vaso)dilators • E exercise, (anything) else
Diuretics • The most effective symptomatic relief • Usually short-term IV therapy followed by long-term PO therapy • Thiazides: • HCTZ, chlorthalidone • Loop diuretics: • Furosemide, torasemide, bumetanide, etacrynic acid • Mixed agents: • Metolazone, nesiritide SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Digitalis glycosides (digoxin, digitoxin) • Their role has declined in recent years (s/p DIG Study) • Digitals does not affect mortality in CHF patients but causes significant: • Reduction in hospitalization • Reduction in symptoms of HF • Actions: • Positive inotropic effect • Arrhythmogenic effect • Vagotonic effect USEFUL IN CASE OF CHF & AF! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Digitalis glycosides (digoxin, digitoxin) • Digoxin levels should be 1.0 – 2.0 ng/dL, but narrow & variable therapeutic window(check serum!) • Toxicity - non cardiac manifestations: • Anorexia, nausea, vomiting, headache, xanthopsia sotoma, disorientation • Toxicity - cardiac manifestations: • Sinus bradycardia and arrest, A/V block (usually 2nd degree), atrial tachycardia with A/V block, development of junctional rhythm in patients with AF, PVC, VT/ VF (bi-directional VT)
(vaso) Dilators: nitrates & hydralazine • Reduction of afterload by arteriolar vasodilatation (hydralazin) ↓LVEDP, O2 consumption, myocardial perfusion, stroke volume and CO • Reduction of preload by venous dilation (nitrates) ↓venous return ↓load on both ventricles • Usually maximum benefit achieved by using both agents, but currently approved (in US) only for African Americans • Other drugs (eg nesiritide) have still very limited clinical role PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
(vaso) Dilators: nitrates & hydralazine A-HeFT Trial NEJM 2004;351:2049
ABCDE approach for HF • A ACE-inhibitors, AII-antagonists, aldosterone-antagonists, anti-arrhythmics, anti- hypertensives, aspirin/anticoagulants • B beta-blockers • C cholesterol (statins), cardiac resynchronization (CRT), coronary PTCA/CABG, cardiac restoration, cardiac transplant • D daily weight, diet, diuretics, digoxin, defibrillators, (vaso)dilators • E exercise, (anything) else
Positive inotropic agents • Improve myocardial contractility (β adrenergic agonists, dopaminergic agents, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, calcium-channel sensitizers): dopamine, dobutamine, milrinone, amrinone, levosimendan • Most studies showed ↑ long-term mortality with inotropic agents • Yet beneficial at short-term use for peripheral hypoperfusion +/- pulmonary edema refractory to diuretics and vasodilators • Only use them is in acute conditions such as cardiogenic shock, as bridge to another lasting intervention (eg transplant) or cardiac injury should be temporary SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Learning goals • Management: • Prevention • Treatment with “ABCDE”: • Pharmacologic therapy • Non-pharmacologic therapy
Diet • Salt restriction • Fluid restriction • Low fat diet in patients at risk or with coronary artery disease • Plus daily weight and, if needed, monitoring of urine output (to tailor therapy) SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Exercise training ExTraMATCH Meta-analysis N=801 BMJ 2004;328:189 PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Non-invasiveventilatoryassistance • CPAP and NIPPV in cardiogenic pulmonary edema reduce the need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation • Moreover, they reduce mortality in acutely decompensated patients • However, there are logistic and compliance issues inherent to these treatment means, especially as long-term regimens PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
Non-invasiveventilatoryassistance Masip et al meta-analysis N=783 JAMA 2004;294:3124
Implantable cardioverter debribillators (ICD) • Patients with EF≤35% and CHF → benefit from ICD (primary prevention) • Patients with history of sustained VT or SCD → benefit from ICD (secondary prevention) • Patients with history of non-sustained VT and EF between 30-40% → electrophysiological testing ± ICD (primary prevention) PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT!
Implantable cardioverter debribillators (ICD) DEFINITE Trial NEJM 2004;350:2151
Amiodarone vs ICD – SCD-HeFT SCD-HeFT Trial NEJM 2005;352:225
Cardiacresynchronizationtherapy (CRT) PROGNOSTIC BENEFIT! SYMPTOMATIC BENEFIT!
CRT improves cardiac function (6 Months) LVEF Avg. Change (Absolute %) MR Jet Area Avg. Change (cm2) Not Reported Control CRT Data sources: MIRACLE: Circulation 2003;107:1985-1990 MIRACLE ICD:JAMA 2003;289:2685-2694 Contak CD: J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;2003;42:1454-1459