200 likes | 420 Views
An Overview of Guidebook . Builds on previous CD4CDM Guidebooks with a focus on:Legal requirements of CDM ProjectsInteraction domestic and international lawIdentifying and managing CDM project related risksCDM project structuring and contracting approaches to creating and transferring CERs Potential structures for CDM ProjectsCDM contract drafting and negotiation .
E N D
1. Introduction to Legal & Contracting Issues in the CDM
3. Key Legal Issues for Project Developers
5. Project Structures
7. CDM Contracts
8. Basic Legal Documentation for Carbon Projects
9. Letter of Endorsement / Non-objection Between Seller/Buyer and Host Country
Expression of Support / Non Objection
Evidence that the Host Country has been informed and endorses the project
No binding endorsement which creates a right to any future approval
10. 2. Letter of Approval Between the Host Country and the Project Developer
But also: between the Host Country and the Annex I country
Should be unconditional
Not clear whether or under what circumstances can be withdrawn
11. 3. Letter of Intent Between Seller and Purchaser
Early legal document (Mandate Letter)
Secures exclusivity – right but not obligation
Cost recovery in case the project sponsor unilaterally decides not to move forward with the negotiations
Helps the project sponsor to obtain financing
13. General Overview of Issues in Structuring CDM Projects The Guidebook discusses means of identifying, allocating and assigning risks through negotiations and contracts.
14. Host Country Political and Sovereign Risks
15. General Project Risks
16. Regulatory Risks
17. VER vs. CERs Sponsors should consider selling CERs if they:
thoroughly understand baseline methodologies and CER/ERU registration process and
are prepared to assume delivery risk
guess risk worth it in exchange for a higher price
do not need to borrow against ER cash flows
Sponsors should consider selling VERs if they:
are not prepared to take VER-CER conversion risk
cannot / do not want to guarantee delivery
need to finance preparation costs
need to borrow against ER cash flows
18. Case of CDCF
Purchases both CERs as well as VERs, also credits post-2012 (70:30).
Takes responsibility for developing (and renewing) the baseline, creating the monitoring plan, selecting and contracting the DOE (i.e. assumes most ‘regulatory’ risk)
Reserves sole right to communicate with CDM regulator
Contracts at fixed prices for majority of credits
Project preparation, verification, certification, and supervision costs (capped) are deducted from payments to Participants
Penalty only in event of fraud, gross negligence, wilful misconduct (eg 3rd party sales)
19. Management of Key Project Risks Generally parties will allocate risk to the party which is best able to control that risk.
The allocation of risks which neither party is able to control should be reflected in the price paid for CERs.
Risk allocation can be dealt with through measures such as:
Conditions precedent to the entry into force of a contract
Guarantees from Host Countries or parent companies
Force majeure clauses
Laying off risks to third parties such as contractors or DOEs
Warranties, indemnities and rights of termination in a contract
20. A final note about Pricing and Negotiations… Price is ultimately a function of overall market dynamics as well as asset quality, risk and sharing of risk
Kyoto / Baseline / Regulatory risk
Project risk
Country risk
Market risk