0 likes | 15 Views
<br>"My Essay Help" is a comprehensive online platform designed to assist students at all academic levels in achieving their writing goals. With a team of experienced writers and educators, we offer a range of services tailored to meet the unique needs of each student.<br><br>Our platform provides personalized assistance with essay writing, research papers, dissertations, and more. Whether you need help brainstorming ideas, structuring your paper, or polishing your final draft, our experts are here to guide you every step of the way.<br><br>At "My Essay Help," we understand the importance of originality and
E N D
MITS5505 Knowledge Management Major Assignment Help Major Assignment
Weightage: 2 5% Due date: 15th of October 2023 Late penalty applies on late submission, 10% per day would be deducted 0 mark for LATE Submission more than one week 0 mark for DUPLICATED Submission or Shared Work OBJECTIVE(S) This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to assess the knowledge of implementation of a knowledge management solution knowledge management. utilizing emerging tools for stages of This assessment covers the following LOs. LO3: Conduct research on emerging tools and techniques for the stages of knowledge creation, acquisition, transfer and management of knowledge and recommend the most appropriate choice based on expert judgement on the practical needs.
LO4: Apply and integrate appropriate KM components to develop effective knowledge management solutions. LO5: Independently design a usable knowledge management strategy by application of key elements of a good knowledge management framework and by incorporating industry best practices and state of the art tools such as OpenKM or other emerging technologies. INSTRUCTIONS These instructions apply to Major Assignment only. Answer the following question based on a case study given overleaf Give your views on implementation and challenges of knowledge management at a company based on five distinct stages of knowledge management: Stage 1: Advocate and learn Stage 2: Develop str ategy Stage 3: Design and launch KM initiatives Stage 4: Expand and support i nitiatives Stage 5: Institutionalize knowledge management Case study: This discussion outlines the adoption and implementation of knowledge management within the Sigma Bank. In 2010, the Bank recognised that it had a very
high of key staff. This was mainly due to two factors: recruitment of staff from a limited glob al pool of specifically skilled labour, and an average length of service of more than nin e years during which time staff members accumulated an extensive knowledge of the Bank and its operations. In response to this and other challenges, the Bank embarked on an ongoing knowledge management program. The Bank invested significant resources into the program and from an initial corporate vision developed a knowledge management framework that led to the identification of potential areas of improvement within the organisation. The resulting knowledge strategy encompassed several key initiatives, the most significant of which was the goal of changing the organisational culture. Other initiatives included the consolidation of the Bank’s contact management into a single system, a review of the existing document management system, and information mapping. To date, while some initiatives have been achieved, others remain to be done. The challenge for the Bank now is to move from structured to unstructured processes for knowledge management and maintain the knowledge management focus while b alancing available resources. The Bank must also consider how best to progress initiatives without necessarily attaching a specific knowledge management label and identify ways to move knowledge management strategies to the next level. There are still several strategies that have not yet been put into place. Although the review of the document management system is partially completed, the introduction of a potential solution is seen to be one that will potentially meet some resistance. The Bank will gained from previous initiatives and with the experience of knowing that while the r oad may at times be difficult, the view from the other side is generally better. There has certainly been progress made in terms of recording past decisions. This has mainly been achieved by targeting individuals developing an e-mail- centric organisation whereby the majority of discussions and debate are captured in threads within e-mails. This has proved successful to date, but moving forward, there may be less use of e-mail and so the Bank will need to initiate alternative approaches to formalise some of the processes. There are also a number of legacy systems operating within parts of the organisation, such as Human Resources. The integration of these is being addressed in the single point of access activity. At this point, the project is still largely in the stages of trying to understand exactly what is the boundary and scope of the project. The Bank is also investigating the idea of “yellow pages,” a system of identifying those the organisation with specific expertise. The context of the system will be somewha t wider than other systems in operation in that the extent of the experience will relat e not just to that of the person’s job but in terms of their wider experience. exposure to loss of knowledge on departure ongoing development of approach this with the insight within
An ongoing challenge for the Bank, like several other organizations’, is that of continuing the ongoing business demands with the level of available resources. In that enviro nment, keeping knowledge management in the forefront is a challenge and needs t o be achieved through practical initiatives that can demonstrably provide tangible and/or strategic benefits. This requires commitment from within the to meet organisation as well as ongoing communication. In the Bank’s case, it looked on knowledge management as a sunk investment and focused on getting acceptance to the framework. Once this was completed, it provided a reference point for the specific initiatives that could be looked they delivered against the framework. Culturally, the Bank is at an interesting crossroads. The organisation is becoming wary of what might be termed as “consulting labels.” As the organisation’s awareness of knowledge management concepts has increased, the term “knowledge management” has become a less favoured label. As a result, one of the challenges for the Bank is to progress the knowledge management initiatives but package them differently. There is also a need to move the Bank’s ongoing development of knowledge management strategies to the next level. To date, a best-practice-based approach has provided a good framework for the Bank. However, one school of thought for ongoing evolution is to explore for developing knowledge management strategies. Embracing complex adaptive syst ems theory, this approach can be used to create a sense-making model that utilises self-organising identify a natural flow model of knowledge creation, disruption, and utilisation. at in terms of how well the more unstructured process capabilities to