1 / 12

Transformation of Scenarios represented in UML 2.0 Sequence Diagrams to CSM

Transformation of Scenarios represented in UML 2.0 Sequence Diagrams to CSM. Toqeer A Israr Carleton University. introduction to UML 2.0 sequence diagrams transformation rules from UML 2.0 to CSM www.sce.carleton.ca/rads/puma/. Conceptual High Level View.

PamelaLan
Download Presentation

Transformation of Scenarios represented in UML 2.0 Sequence Diagrams to CSM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transformation of Scenarios represented in UML 2.0 Sequence Diagrams to CSM Toqeer A Israr Carleton University • introduction to UML 2.0 sequence diagrams • transformation rules from UML 2.0 to CSM • www.sce.carleton.ca/rads/puma/

  2. Conceptual High Level View Create Input Output Eclipse Eclipse Eclipse Navigate annotated UML model Apply Profile Java Create UML 2.0 model represented as internal data structure Annotated model with performance annotations Generate CSM objects(in Java) XMI XMI XML

  3. Simple Interaction Diagram Message Interaction sd S s:CA t:CB Lifeline EventOccurrence (receiving) m1 Gate Event Occurrence Execution Occurrence Event Occurrence (sending)

  4. ref ref EstablishAccess(“Illegal PIN”) OpenDoor Complex Interaction Diagram sd C User :System Interaction Occurrence CardOut opt msg(“Please Enter”) Combined Fragment

  5. sd S1 . . . . . . s:CA t:CB Step::x1’ . . . . . . . . . Step::x1 Seq Step::x1 x1’ Step::x2 Seq m1 Step::x2 x1 x2 Step::x2 Seq . . . x1” . . . Step::x1” Notation: Seq . . . Synchronous message between passive objects

  6. sd S2 <<PAresource>> s:CA <<PAresource>> t:CB . . . . . . m1 x1 x2 Synchronous Message between objects stereotyped <<Paresource>> Component s was acquired before x1 Processing Resource:: CPU . . . Processing Resource:: CPU Component: s Step::x1 ResAcq:: Component: t Step:x2 ResRel:: . . .

  7. sd SA Step::x1’ s:CA t:CB Fork x1’ Step:x2 Step:x1” m1 x1 x1’’ x2 Step::x1 Fork Step:x2 . . . Asynchronous Message

  8. Step::x1’ Fork Step:x3 Step:x2 Asynchronous Message (cont) sd SA s:CA t:CB m1 x1 m2 x2 x3

  9. x1 x2 x3 Asynchronous message between components stereotyped <<PAresource>> sd SA2 Component s was acquired before x1 <<PAresource>> s:CA <<PAresource>> t:CB Processing Resource:: CPU . . . . . . . . . Step::x1 Component: s m1 Processing Resource:: CPU m2 Fork Step:x2 ResAcq:: Component: t . . . Step:x3 . . .

  10. sd CF x2 x3 x1 x4 Interaction Diagram – Combined Fragment Component s was acquired before x1 Processing Resource:: CPU . . . s:CA t:CB Step::x1 m1 ResAcq:: Component: s Step::x2 alt value > 0 m2 ResRel:: Branch ResAcq:: ResAcq:: [else] m3 Step::x3 Step::x3 Component: t ResRel:: ResRel:: . . . . . . Processing Resource:: CPU

  11. sd IO . . . Processing Resource:: CPU s:CA t:CB Step::x1 Processing Resource:: CPU m1 ResRel:: x2 Component: t ResAcq:: x1 ref Step::x2 y Component: s ResRel:: ResAcq:: Step::y . . . Interaction Diagram – Interaction Occurrence

  12. Accomplished Created UML 2.0 diagrams in Eclipse programmatic approach using UML2 plug-in Defined & applied the UML Performance Profile Work In Progress Implementation of the transformation rules from sequence and deployment diagrams to CSM Testing / Validation Future Work Express the above transformation in MOF QVT, if possible Status

More Related