1 / 9

ABIM: Nephrology Board

ABIM: Nephrology Board Dr. Stuart Linas Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology November 4-9, 2008 ABIM: Nephrology Test Writing Committee (2008) Sharon Adler Arnie Berns David Buchinsky Tom Coffman Connie Davis David Ellison Alp Ikizler

Pat_Xavi
Download Presentation

ABIM: Nephrology Board

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ABIM: Nephrology Board Dr. Stuart Linas Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology November 4-9, 2008

  2. ABIM: Nephrology Test Writing Committee (2008) • Sharon Adler • Arnie Berns • David Buchinsky • Tom Coffman • Connie Davis • David Ellison • Alp Ikizler • Stu Linas (Chair) • Mark Perazella

  3. Certification Pass Rates(for first-time takers)

  4. Mean Equated Score by Program Director Rating2007 Nephrology Certification Exam - 1st-time takers

  5. First-year Nephrology Fellows by Gender

  6. First-year Nephrology Fellows by Medical School

  7. Certification Exam Pass RatesFirst-time takers by Medical School

  8. Maintenance of Certification Pass Rates(for first-time takers with valid 10-year certificates)

  9. Computer-Based Testing Satisfaction Survey ResponsesFall 2007 Certification and Maintenance of Certification ExaminationsPercentages are sums of negative ratings (Strongly Disagree + Disagree) Nephrology All Exams Rate of disagreement with each of the following statements: (N=543) (N=11,624) 1. Scheduling a test center seat with Pearson was easy 1% 4% 2. The distance I had to travel to the test center was reasonable 7% 9% 3. The test center was easy to locate 4% 6% 4. The test center registration/check-in process was handled in an efficient manner 1% 1% 5. The extent of the security procedures at the test site was appropriate 3% 4% 6. The test environment was comfortable 5% 4% 7. The test environment was quiet 6% 6% 8. The test center staff was helpful and knowledgeable 1% 1% 9. The tutorial was easy to use 0% 1% 10. The testing system was easy to use 0% 1% 11. The navigation throughout the examination was easy 3% 2% 12. The amount of time allowed for breaks was appropriate 3% 3% 13. The question text was easy to read 15% 14% 14. The figures/illustrations were clear 10% 13% 15. Overall, I was satisfied with my testing experience 2% 4%

More Related