1 / 29

NEW FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS

NEW FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS. Implementation Issues. Academic Competitiveness Grants and SMART Grants. Panelists. Beth Asmus Director, Financial Aid, College of the Canyons Mindy Bergeron Director, Financial Aid, John F. Kennedy University Jacqueline Bradley

Pat_Xavi
Download Presentation

NEW FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NEW FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS

  2. Implementation Issues Academic Competitiveness Grants and SMART Grants

  3. Panelists • Beth Asmus Director, Financial Aid, College of the Canyons • Mindy Bergeron Director, Financial Aid, John F. Kennedy University • Jacqueline Bradley Asst. Dean, Financial Aid & EOPS, Mendocino College • Ken Walsh Director, Financial Aid, California Maritime Academy

  4. The Bleeding Edge • This presentation has been developed on information from: • AACRAO ConferenceMarch 6, 2006 • NASFAA Leadership ConferenceMarch 7, 2006

  5. Legislative Background • Two federal grant programs created as part of the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 • Drafted behind closed doors without public hearings or consultation with the Department of Education or NASFAA • Signed into law February 8, 2006

  6. Operational Schedule • Department of Education must implement for 2006-07 • Higher Education Reconciliation Act amends Title IV of the Higher Education Act • Compressed timeline does not allow for negotiated rulemaking prior to initial implementation • Negotiated rulemaking may be part of review process once the implemented, with changes effective for the 2008-2009 academic year

  7. Proposed Calendar MARCH 2006 • Solicitation from States definition of “rigorous secondary school programs” • Preliminary heads-up discussions with major ERPs

  8. Proposed Calendar MAY 2006 • “Dear Colleague Letter” and Final Regulations published by end of May

  9. Proposed Calendar JULY 2006 • Eligible majors announced • Web site for self-certification to be operational • Number of eligible recipients estimated, and award amounts published

  10. Good News! $4.5 Billion in mandatory spending appropriated for 5 years FY 2006 $790 Million FY 2007 $850 Million FY 2008 $920 Million FY 2009 $960 Million FY 2010 $1.01 Billion

  11. Fixed Grant Amounts ACG First Year Student $ 750 Second Year Student $1,300 SMART Grants Third Year Student $4,000 Fourth Year Student $4,000

  12. Possible Award Modifications • If funding insufficient to provide grants to all eligible students: • Award levels will be ratably reduced • Legislation authorizes additional appropriations to restore awards

  13. Possible Award Modifications • Award levels are fixed: • Student must attend full-time • No variation in amount based on income • May not exceed Cost of Attendance

  14. Student Eligibility • Students must be: • U.S. Citizen (no permanent residents, asylees, or refugees) • Recent high school graduates • Full-time degree-seeking students at 2- or 4-year institutions • Pell-eligible with maximum EFC=3850

  15. ACG ChallengesAdditional Student Criteria • Recent high school graduates must have completed a “rigorous secondary school program” established by a state or local education agency and recognized by the Secretary of Education • NOT YET DEFINED

  16. ACG ChallengesAdditional Student Criteria • Not previously enrolled in an undergraduate program • Cumulative GPA of at least 3.0 by end of first academic year

  17. SMART Grant ChallengesAdditional Student Criteria • Third or fourth year undergraduate program • Pursuing a qualified major at a 4-year degree-granting institution • Cumulative GPA of at least 3.0 in courses required for the major

  18. SMART GrantQualified Academic Majors • Pursuing a major in: • Physical, life, or computer sciences, mathematics, technology, or engineering OR • A foreign language critical to the national security of the United States

  19. ACG ChallengeRigorous Program Definition • “Has successfully completed, after January 1, 2006, a rigorous secondary school program of study established by a State or local educational agency and recognized as such by the Secretary” • Defined by each state and recognized by the Secretary • Catalogued and available for look-up on ED web site for FAFSA applicants and campus staff

  20. ACG Implementation:“Student Centered Model” • FSA notifies student of potential eligibility • Student self-certifies eligibility and identifies program on FAFSA supplement • School obtains roster of self-certified students from CPS • School (FAO via the ADMISSIONS OFFICE) verifies student eligibility and initiates draw-down funds via COD

  21. Verification Challenges • High Schools: • The law cannot compel to supply information • Department of Education has no mechanism for data exchange

  22. Verification Challenges • Colleges and Universities: • While most admission offices (EXCEPT COMMUNITY COLLEGES) do collect transcripts, many transcripts will be preliminary and will not document “completion” of the program • Does completion of the program include passing CAHSEE? • Depending on the complexities of the definition of rigor, identification of rigorous programs may not be a trivial matter • Institutions would need to develop expertise in published definitions for all recognized programs in all 50 states

  23. ACG Student Eligibility • “Not previously enrolled” issues • Students may have enrolled for college coursework while in high school • AACRAO hopes the definition will comply with GRS definition of a cohort and apply to first-time, full-time enrollment in a degree program after graduation from high school • Department of Education thinks this is how the ruling will be applied

  24. ACG2nd Year Student Eligibility • Eligibility for the 2nd academic year requires a cumulative GPA of at least 3.0 at the end of the first academic year • Registrar’s office would certify GPA eligibility to FAO • FAO would initiate draw-down for eligible students via COD • No grades would be transmitted to ED

  25. SMART Grants • Institution initiates student eligibility - contingent on college academic program major • Secretary of Education will publish eligible fields of study by CIP • Financial Aid Office checks potentially eligible students (based on citizenship, full-time status, Pell eligibility) • Registrar supplies data on major CIP and certify GPA eligibility • Specific CIP code would be communicated back to Department of Education

  26. SMART Grant GPA • Cumulative GPA of at least 3.0 in the coursework required for the qualified major • WHAT ABOUT TRANSFER STUDENTS? • The meaning of “required” will be clarified in regulations: • Coursework that passes degree audit for graduation (including all the pre-requisites and electives) OR • Courses in the qualified field of study only

  27. Academic Year • “Academic Year” defined the same as annual loan limits • Student eligibility one award per academic year • Only eligible for 1st Year ACG the year after high school graduation (2nd Year award is good two years after high school graduation) • Intent is that the 3rd year of full-time study would find the student at a four-year institution • If student attends one semester full-time and one semester part-time, they have used their award for the 1st year • If they only attend full-time in the Spring they can receive the full award

  28. QUESTIONS? • Please understand that this reflects only the intent of the Department of Education at this time • ED will respond as quickly as possible to “get the most money to the most students possible”

  29. Our attorneys have advised us to inform you that we have all signed a “Hold Harmless Clause” prior to providing you with this presentation. Hold Harmless Clause

More Related