E N D
1. The Common Law in America From Magna Carta to the War on Terror
3. Common Law as Distinct From Local Law in Medieval England Common law is common to all the royal courts of England
Common law courts draw business away from feudal and Church courts
Common law courts help English kings to preserve order, efficient administration, in a far-flung kingdom (both sides of the Channel)
4. The Common Law Writ System An order from the king to the sheriff commanding the appearance of the defendant to answer a complaint
Every writ was based on a specific principle of law
Writs were very narrowly interpreted
5. The Writ of Right The King to the sheriff, greeting. Command [Smith] that justly and without delay he render to [Jones] one hide of land in such a vill, whereof the said [Jones] complains that the said [Smith] deforces him. And if he does not do this, summon him by good summoners that he be before me or my justices on the morrow of the second Sunday after Easter at such a place to show why he did not do it. And have there the summoners and this writ.
6. Specific Implications of Writ of Right
Injured party initiates action for remedy
Must state facts consistent with remedy sought
If defendant refuses royal order, he must appear in court to explain his refusal
Judge and jury decide the outcome after hearing both parties
7. General Implications of Writ of Right
Royal interest in the undisturbed possession of property
Willingness to decide disputes impartially
Readiness to enforce judicial decisions
8. Angevin Influences on Early Development of the Common Law Henry II (1154-1189)
Skillful and energetic administrator
Founder of common law
Richard the Lionheart (1189-1199)
Absent from England
Incurs heavy financial obligations
John (1199-1216)
Inept and abrasive
Forced by barons to sign Magna Carta
9. Ramifications of Magna Carta A statement of the law to which King and Barons would adhere
Later understood more broadly
Chapter 61: a right of resistance against tyrannical rule
Chapter 12 : no taxation without representation
Chapter 39: early statement of due process
10. Common Law as Distinct From Positive Law Common law: a body of principles derived by judges from precedent or custom
Positive law: statutes made by legislatures and regulations issued by administrators
11. Common Law as Distinct from Civil Law Present use depends on primary cultural influences
French and German legal systems heavily influenced by Roman law codified by Justinian (A.D. 527-565)
Former British colonies uniformly adopt common law
Distinction fades over time
Common law systems make more use of statutes,
Civil law systems make more use of judicial precedent
12. Common Law in the U.S. All states except Louisiana began with the same British common law
In time, individual state systems of common law diverge
To find the common law in a state, find the relevant state court precedent and then reason by analogy
13. Doctrine of Stare Decisis Prior decisions of the highest court in a jurisdiction are binding on all lower courts
Common laws natural tendency is conservative
Positive law better at responding to social change
14. Critical Difference Between Common Law and Positive Law Blackstone treats judges as incorruptible oracles
Holmes is more realistic, but retains belief in self-sustaining system
Different in practice, antithetical in spirit
Common law begins as a consolidation of royal power, but becomes a limitation by 17th century
Positive law (Parliamentary supremacy) begins as a limitation on royal power in 17th century, but becomes the essence of the modern state by 20th century
15. Rule of Power or Rule of Law Conflict emerges most clearly in two areas
Rise of the administrative state
Due process and the War on Terror
Possible reconciliation of two views by shifting focus
from custom and formal procedure to authority and obligation
from law as externally forced to law as voluntarily undertaken
16. Illustrations Abrams v. United States (1919)
Roth v. United States (1957)
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006)