1 / 10

The Technology S-curve

The Technology S-curve The S-Curve Four Propositions At industry level, S-curves help explain why alternative technologies succeed or fail To achieve high performance, component technology must be improved as well as the architectural system design

Pat_Xavi
Download Presentation

The Technology S-curve

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Technology S-curve Professor Aron Spencer

  2. The S-Curve Professor Aron Spencer

  3. Four Propositions • At industry level, S-curves help explain why alternative technologies succeed or fail • To achieve high performance, component technology must be improved as well as the architectural system design • S-curves are useful for descriptive analysis, but less useful for prescriptive analysis • Established firms may have an advantage with component related S-curve changes, but attackers have advantage with architectural changes Professor Aron Spencer

  4. Why does technology plateau? • Fundamental Natural Laws • Scale phenomena (too large or too small) • System complexity • Insufficient investment Professor Aron Spencer

  5. Types of Technological Change • Architectural Change • Rearrangement of the way components relate to each other within a product’s system design • Modular innovation • A fundamental change in the technological approach employed in a component, but architecture is unchanged. • Incremental Change • Improvements in component performance that build on established technology concept • Improvements if system design with no significant changes in component relationships. • Radical Innovations • Involve both new architecture and new fundamental component technologies Professor Aron Spencer

  6. Prescriptive S-Curve Strategy Follow the Grey line… Professor Aron Spencer

  7. Where is the S-Curve? Professor Aron Spencer

  8. Why Different Limits? • Nobody knows what the natural, physical performance limit is in complex engineered products • Perceptions of technological maturity may be highly firm specific • Limits may be influenced by resources invested. Professor Aron Spencer

  9. Relationship between technology adoption and performance Professor Aron Spencer

  10. Summary • S-curve analysis is more useful to see where you are/have been than where you should go • Managers need to balance where they place their investments • Don’t mistake an architectural technology change for a component technology shift • First movers have an advantage with these • Incumbents often lose (more to come…) Professor Aron Spencer

More Related