1 / 47

41 st DAC Tuesday Keynote

41 st DAC Tuesday Keynote. Giga-scale Integration for Tera-Ops Performance Opportunities and New Frontiers. Pat Gelsinger Senior Vice President & CTO Intel Corporation June 8, 2004. Litho Cost. FAB Cost. Test Capital. G. Moore ISSCC 03. www.icknowledge.com. Based on SIA roadmap.

Patman
Download Presentation

41 st DAC Tuesday Keynote

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 41st DAC Tuesday Keynote

  2. Giga-scaleIntegration for Tera-OpsPerformanceOpportunities and New Frontiers Pat Gelsinger Senior Vice President & CTO Intel Corporation June 8, 2004

  3. Litho Cost FAB Cost Test Capital G. Moore ISSCC 03 www.icknowledge.com Based on SIA roadmap Why Bother?

  4. Litho Cost FAB Cost Scaling dead at 130-nm, says IBM technologistBy Peter Clarke , Silicon Strategies May 04, 2004 (2:28 PM EDT)PRAGUE, Czech Republic — The traditional scaling of semiconductor manufacturing processes died somewhere between the 130- and 90-nanometer nodes, Bernie Meyerson, IBM's chief technology officer, told an industry forum. G. Moore ISSCC 03 www.icknowledge.com Why Bother?

  5. $ per MIPS $ per Transistor No exponential is forever, but you can delay forever… –Gordon Moore Believe in the Law

  6. Direction For The Future

  7. Moore’s Law Is Alive & Well … CMOS Outlook However …

  8. CMOS Outlook

  9. Guiding Observations Transistors (and silicon) are free Power is the only real limiter Optimizing for frequency AND/OR area may achieve neither

  10. GATE DRAIN SOURCE BODY MOS Transistor Scaling GATE Xj DRAIN SOURCE Tox D BODY Leff Technology has scaled well, and will continue…

  11. Delivering Performance in Power Envelope Mobile, Power Envelope ~20-30W Desktop, Power Envelope ~60-90W Server, Power Envelope ~100-130W

  12. G G Strained Silicon – 90nm+ S D S D NMOS PMOS Tensile Si3N4 Cap SiGe S-D creates strain 10-25% higher ON current 84-97% leakage current reduction OR 15% active power reduction Source: Mark Bohr, Intel

  13. 90nm MOS Transistor 50nm Gate Gate Leakage Solutions: High-K + Metal Gate 1.2 nm SiO2 Silicon substrate Gate & Source-Drain Leakage

  14. Gate 3 Drain Lg WSi Gate 1 TSi Source Gate 2 New Transistors: Tri-Gate… Tri-gate Gate Drain Source Source: Intel Improved short-channel effects Higher ON current for lower SD Leakage Manufacturing control: research underway

  15. Metal Interconnects Interconnect RC Delay

  16. New Challenge: VariationsStatic & Dynamic

  17. Uniform Non-uniform Random Dopant Fluctuations

  18. Sub-wavelength Lithography Adds Variations Lithography Wavelength 365nm 248nm 193nm 180nm 130nm Gap 90nm 65nm Generation 45nm 32nm 13nm EUV

  19. Impact of Static Variations 1.4 Frequency ~30% Leakage Power ~5-10X 30% 1.3 1.2 130nm Normalized Frequency 1.1 1.0 5X 0.9 1 2 3 4 5 Normalized Leakage (Isb)

  20. Dynamic Variations: Vdd & Temperature Temperature Variation (°C) Hot spots Heat Flux (W/cm2) Results in Vcc variation

  21. Technology Challenges Power: Active + Leakage Interconnects (RC Delay) Variations

  22. Design Methodology IsChanging…

  23. Active Power Reduction High Supply Voltage Slow Fast Slow Multiple Vdd Low Supply Voltage • Vdd scaling will slow down • Mimic Vdd scaling with multiple Vdd • Challenges: • Interface between low & high Vdd • Delivery and distribution

  24. Body Bias Stack Effect Sleep Transistor Vbp Vdd +Ve Logic Block Equal Loading Vbn -Ve 2-10X Reduction 5-10X Reduction 2-1000X Reduction Leakage Control

  25. Adaptive Body Biasing too leaky ABB Number of dies Number of dies too slow RBB RBB FBB FBB f f f f target target Frequency Frequency

  26. No BB ABB Within die ABB 97% highest bin 100% yield 100% yield with Adaptive Body Biasing 97% highest freq bin with ABB for within die variability Adaptive Body Biasing 100% 60% Accepted Die 20% 0% Low Frequency Bin High Frequency Bin

  27. Vdd/2 Vdd Freq = 1 Vdd = 1 Throughput = 1 Power = 1 Area = 1 Power Den = 1 Freq = 0.5 Vdd = 0.5 Throughput = 1 Power = 0.25 Area = 2 Power Den = 0.125 Logic Block Logic Block Logic Block RC Delay Tolerant Design Lower Power And Power Density RC Delay Mitigation Throughput Oriented Design

  28. power 2 2 target frequency probability 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 large high small low Transistor size Low-Vt usage Variation Tolerant Circuit Design • Higher probability of target frequency with: • Larger transistor sizes • Higher Low-Vt usage • But with power penalty

  29. µ-architecture Is Also Changing…

  30. 60% # critical paths 1.4 40% 1.3 Number of dies 20% Mean clock frequency 1.2 0% 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 Clock frequency 1.1 1 9 17 25 # of critical paths NMOS Device I 40% ON PMOS 20% 1.0 # of samples (%) Delay to Ion-s 40% 0.5 20% Ratio of 0% delay-s -16% -8% 0% 8% 16% 0.0 16 49 Variation (%) Logic depth Variations and µ-architecture

  31. 1.5 1 0.5 0 More Less # uArch critical paths frequency target frequency probability Variation Tolerant µ-architecture 1.5 1 0.5 0 Small Large Logic depth • Decrease variability in the design: • Deeper logic depth • Smaller number of critical paths

  32. Implications For CAD Logic & Circuits Layout Test

  33. Path Delay Deterministic Deterministic Probabilistic Frequency Probabilistic 10X variation ~50% total power # of Paths # of Paths Delay Target Delay Target Leakage Power Probabilistic Design Due to variations in: Vdd, Vt, and Temp Probability Delay Deterministic design techniques inadequate in the future

  34. Today: Local Optimization Single Variable Tomorrow: Global Optimization Multi-variate Shift in Design Paradigm • Multi-variable design optimization for: • Yield and bin splits • Parameter variations • Active and leakage power • Performance

  35. Vdd Vdd Ip Op Op Vss Vss Today’s Freelance Layout No layout restrictions

  36. Vdd Vdd Ip Op Op Vss Vss Future Transistor Orientation Restrictions Transistor orientation restricted to improve manufacturing control

  37. Future Transistor Width Quantization Vdd Vdd Op Ip Op Vss Vss

  38. Today’s Unrestricted Routing

  39. Future Metal Restrictions

  40. Today’s Metric: Maximizing Transistor Density Dense layout causes hot-spots

  41. Tomorrow’s Metric: Optimizing Transistor & Power Density Balanced Layout

  42. Other Challenges … Test & Debug

  43. Understandable … Test Capital/ Transistor Test Capital Based on SIA roadmap Based on SIA roadmap Disturbing … Test Challenges

  44. 0.25 >1E-4 0.4 On-Die Scope Waveform 0.125 1E-5 0.2 Differential Voltage (V) 0.0 Voltage (V) 0 1E-6 -0.2 -0.4 0.0 1.8 3.6 5.4 7.1 8.9 10.7 12.5 1E-7 -0.125 Time (ns) <1E-8 -0.25 0 104 208 312 416 Time (ps) On Die Test Methodology On die debug & test of 8Gb/sec IO interface • Move from external to on-die “self testing” • High-speed test & debug hardware on each die • Low speed, low cost, interface to external tester ISSCC 2003: 8Gb/s Differential Simultaneous Bidirectional Link with 4mV, 9ps Waveform Capture Diagnostic Capability

  45. Other Challenges … Mixed-signal Design System-level Design Correctness Multi-clock domains Resiliency

  46. Business As Usual Is NOT An Option For CAD…

  47. Summary BELIEVE CMOS scaling will continue, transistors become free SHIFT Deterministic  Probabilistic, Single  Multi EMBRACE local to global optimization: power,…

More Related