1 / 33

Trocascope XC2000 ver. 2.0

Trocascope XC2000 ver. 2.0. Brought to you by: Smooth Operation Chris Kitt, Brenda Marcum, Jacob Oliver, Michael Roth, and Andrew Yuan. Laparoscopy Background. Minimally invasive abdominal surgery Multiple ports for tools – separate one for laparoscope. Current Laparoscopic Process.

RexAlvis
Download Presentation

Trocascope XC2000 ver. 2.0

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trocascope XC2000 ver. 2.0 Brought to you by: Smooth Operation Chris Kitt, Brenda Marcum, Jacob Oliver, Michael Roth, and Andrew Yuan

  2. Laparoscopy Background • Minimally invasive abdominal surgery • Multiple ports for tools – separate one for laparoscope Current Laparoscopic Process

  3. Trocascope XC2000 ver. 2.0 • Eliminate one port by incorporating the camera onto the tool port • More convenient for surgical team - fewer hands required and viewable screen • Less traumatic for patient

  4. Project Goals and Objectives • Combine current laparoscope with current surgical instrument to eliminate one port • Minimize camera module size, while maintaining speed and resolution • High resolution image displayed on LCD panel • Minimal wires – hopefully completely wireless and battery powered • Incorporate data storage device for later viewing

  5. Low Objectives • 10 mm max diameter for camera module • 640x480 resolution • 30 fps • LCD screen • LED lighting with imager • All wired connections • AC power

  6. Mid Level Objectives • Battery powered – supplement with AC (2-2.5 hr run time) • 6 mm max diameter of camera module • Higher resolution • Wireless • Stream video data to external monitor • Screen shot capability • SD onboard storage • Enable touch screen features

  7. High Level Objectives • Multi-camera interface – split screen • Motorized camera module • Time display • Audio features • Wireless transmission to external monitor • Foot pedal • 4 mm maximum diameter of camera module • Wireless storage to external device

  8. Microcontroller w/ISI and LCD controller Camera (0V7690) VGA LCD Display LED(s) SD Card Block Diagram Rechargeable Battery Battery Charger Controller Top View

  9. Microcontroller ATMEL AT32AP7000 32bit AVR

  10. Microcontroller w/ISI and LCD controller Camera (0V7690) Camera • Connected via SCCB (I2C) and 8 parallel data lines • Camera takes 640x480 @ 30fps and sends it to the Image sensor interface on the microcontroller. • Microcontroller controls imager via SCCB connection.

  11. Microcontroller w/ISI and LCD controller LED(s) LED(s) • Connected via GPIO, possibly buffered with MOSFET or BJT to supply additional power • Each LED is connected through a buffer to a general I/O pin on the Microcontroller. • Allows touch screen to control LED through microcontroller, ideal for saving power and adjustable brightness. • LED will be selected for maximum efficiency and brightness. Don’t want to burn patient and want lots of illumination.

  12. Microcontroller w/ISI and LCD controller VGA LCD Display LCD • Connected via Microcontroller LCD interface. • Microcontroller takes data from imager and displays it on the LCD in VGA format. • Microcontroller takes button presses from LCD and performs desired operations, ie toggling LEDs, screenshots, etc • Utilizes RGB parallel input with 18 bits of color • VGA standards (480x640 @ 30 fps)

  13. Microcontroller w/ISI and LCD controller SD Card External Storage • SD Card viable option for video storage and retrieval • Uses standard SPI interface to communicate • Uses FAT32 storage system • SD interface built into processor • Easy to find documentation on SD interface

  14. Division of Labor

  15. Timeline

  16. Risks/Concerns • Microprocessor Options • BGA vs. Quad Flatpack • Smaller/less features vs. timing issues • Other alternatives available • Long BGA layout turn-around time • Unfamiliar Technology • PCB layout • Eval. Board coding vs. prelim. Demo board coding

  17. Alternative #1 Top View LCD controller (Epson S1D13513) Camera (0V7690) Microcontroller w/ISI (OV530-B49) VGA LCD Display LED(s) SD Card

  18. Alternative #2 Top View Image Sensor Controller (Atmel 32-bit Image Sensor interface) Microcontroller W/LCD controller (NXP LPC2158 ARM7) VGA LCD Display Camera (0V7690) SD Card LED(s)

  19. Alternative #3 Top View Image Sensor Controller (Atmel 32-bit Image Sensor interface) LCD controller (Epson S1D13513) Microcontroller Camera (0V7690) VGA LCD Display SD Card LED(s)

  20. Risks/Concerns Cont’d • Schedule Uncertainty • Enough time to learn how to store data, battery operable, etc. • Prototype completed by the beginning of March? • Component Risks • Expensive Eval. Board • Sensor frame rate and resolution vs. size • Questionable Feasibility • Low level objectives seem obtainable • Can we make our mid/high level objectives?

  21. Market • Over 2 million laparoscopic surgeries performed each year • New laparoscopic surgeries are being introduced as technology improves • 6 million Trocar used each year

  22. Laparoscopic Surgery • Patient’s Point of View • Cheaper • $1,000 less than open surgery • Quicker Recovery • Hospital stay is 1/4th the time of open surgery • Post operative pain is less • Reduced infection rate

  23. Laparoscopic Surgery • Surgeon’s Point of View • Longer operative times • Expensive equipment • Requires extra surgical training • More complicated surgery • 1 in 2000 patients suffer vascular injuries • 17% of vascular injuries are fatal • Average surgical malpractice lawsuit = $222,285

  24. Our Goal • Make laparoscopic surgery more appealing to surgeon • Efficient • Faster Operative Times • Easier • Fewer mistakes • Less Surgical training • Safer • Less Crowded Operating Room

  25. Cost Per Surgery

  26. Environmental Impact • Biomedical Waste • 6 Million Trocar used and disposed each year • Removing 1 Trocar per surgery reduces number by 1-2 million • Potential for Reusability is important

  27. Sustainability • Part Availability • All parts can be obtained from variety of different vendors • Maintenance • Trocar are eventually disposed • Data storage device • Support • Training • Setting up data storage

  28. Projected Cost

  29. Manufacturability • Component tolerances may have effect on image quality • Testing • Development Board • Processor on a simple PCB • Regulations • FDA • FCC

  30. Safety • Laparoscopic Surgery • Dangerous Instruments • Complex Procedure • Crowded workspace • Exposure to patient blood • Our Goal • Reduce Complexity • Less Crowded

  31. Impact on Society • Safer, more efficient surgeries • Reduce number of assistants required for surgery • Potential for cheaper surgery • 3rd world surgery potential

  32. QUESTIONS?!?!

More Related