250 likes | 1.03k Views
Audit Risk Model. AR = IR x CR x DRAR = Audit riskThe risk that the auditor will incorrectly issue an unqualified opinionIR = Inherent riskThe risk of material misstatements absent any internal controls or testing. Audit Risk Model. CR = Control riskThe risk that internal controls will fail to prevent or detect material misstatementDR = Detection riskThe risk that audit tests will fail to detect material misstatementTherefore, audit risk is a function of inherent risk, unchecked by contr9462
E N D
1. Audit Risk and Internal Controls
2. Audit Risk Model AR = IR x CR x DR
AR = Audit risk
The risk that the auditor will incorrectly issue an unqualified opinion
IR = Inherent risk
The risk of material misstatements absent any internal controls or testing
3. Audit Risk Model CR = Control risk
The risk that internal controls will fail to prevent or detect material misstatement
DR = Detection risk
The risk that audit tests will fail to detect material misstatement
Therefore, audit risk is a function of inherent risk, unchecked by controls and not detected by the auditor
4. Risk Components Inherent risk
Higher in complex transactions
Higher where items are more naturally prone to fraud
Based in part on prior experience
Industry and management pressures
Inherent risk cannot be changed by the auditor – it just is
5. Control Risk Part of Audit Risk Model
Depends on the design and execution of controls
Audit Risk = risk that internal controls will FAIL to prevent or detect misstatement
High CR means high risk controls will fail
Low CR means low risk controls will fail
If CR is high, auditor will not rely much on controls
If CR is low, auditor can rely on ICS and reduce other types of testing
6. Risk Components, II More Control risk
Depends on all 5 COSO categories
Observed by the auditor but cannot be changed retroactively
Detection risk
A function of the types of tests the auditor does
Remember nature, timing, and extent
This is the only risk element that can be controlled by the auditor
7. Is Risk Quantifiable? Yes and No
Often assessed in percentage terms
Requires judgment because no number is out there to be measured
Detection risk needs to be quantified for statistical testing
8. Interrelationship of Risks IF IR and CR are high, then
If IR is high and CR is low
If IR is low and CR is low
If IR is low but CR is high DR should be low (lots of testing)
DR can be higher, because controls offset high IR
DR can be high
Somewhat indicative of fraud. DR should be very low
9. What is Acceptable Audit Risk? Risk the auditor is willing to take of being wrong
Generally considered in terms of unqualified where there are misstatements, but not in reverse
Depends on engagement risk
Financial stability
Industry factors
Management integrity
Degree of reliance on audited statements
10. Keep Things Open Control risk assessment must be backed up by control testing results
If tests show weaker controls, CR is higher, thus DR needs to be lower
11. Internal Control Objectives Reliability of financial statements
Efficiency and effectiveness of operations
Compliance with laws and regulations
Safeguarding of assets
12. Underlying Limitations Reasonable assurance
Cost-benefit
Inherent limitations
collusion
13. Design of ICS Preventing material misstatements
Detecting material misstatements
Preventing misappropriation
Detecting misappropriation
SarbOx: Management must assess and report on design
How are transaction initiated, authorized, recorded, processed, and reported?
Are there any weaknesses?
14. Effectiveness of ICS Is the control operating as designed?
Is the person operating the control qualified to do so effectively?
Does the person have the necessary authority?
How should management assess this?
15. Management’s Report on ICS Must describe design
Must make assertions about effectiveness
Must report material weaknesses
A single weakness prevents claim that ICS is operating effectively
Must be able to document basis for report
Auditor will provide an opinion on the report
Any weaknesses mean that auditor’s report will be adverse.
16. COSO Components of ICS Control environment
Risk assessment
Control activities
Information and communication
Monitoring
17. Control Environment Reflects management’s overall attitude toward controls
Integrity and ethical values
Commitment to competence
Audit committee / Board of Directors
Philosophy and operating style
Organizational structure
HR practices
Environment sets the stage for all the rest!
18. Risk Assessment Management’s identification of risks
Economic
Industry
Regulatory
Operating risks
Analysis and management of risks
Examples
Oil companies in the Gulf of Mexico
Smith Corona
19. Control Activities Policies and procedures to address risks
Pertains to all four other areas
Separation of duties
Proper authorization
Adequate documents and records
Physical control over assets and records
Independent checks
20. Information and Communication Initiates, records, processes, and reports
Transaction cycles
Subsidiaries and controls
Think of PERCV
21. Monitoring Need to ensure controls are working
Monitoring now more pressing because of SarbOx
Control needs change
Personnel change
Organizational structure changes
22. Documenting your understanding Narratives
Flowcharts
Pictures tell a thousand words!
Questionnaires
All no answers are weaknesses
Look for mitigating controls elsewhere
Be sure connections are made
Insufficient by itself
23. Reading a Flowchart Top left to bottom right
Try to keep one department or operator in one column
Decision points give alternate paths
Connectors are usually necessary
24. Common Flowchart Symbols Data enters system
Process
Document
Multiple copies
File Stored data file
Disk storage
Decision point
Connector