E N D
3. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–2 After studying this chapter,you should be able to: Explain the factors that determine an individual’s personality.
Describe the MBTI personality framework.
Identify the key traits in the Big Five personality model.
Explain the impact of job typology on the personality/job performance relationship.
Differentiate emotions from moods.
Contrast felt versus displayed emotions.
4. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–3 After studying this chapter,you should be able to: Explain gender-differences in emotions.
Describe external constraints on emotions.
Apply concepts on emotions to OB issues.
5. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–4 What is Personality?
6. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–5 The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
7. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–6 Myers-Briggs Sixteen Primary Traits
8. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–7 The Big Five Model of Personality Dimensions
9. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–8 Major Personality Attributes Influencing OB Locus of control
Machiavellianism
Self-esteem
Self-monitoring
Risk taking
Type A personality
10. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–9 Locus of Control
11. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–10 Machiavellianism
12. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–11 Self-Esteem and Self-Monitoring
13. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–12 Risk-Taking High Risk-taking Managers
Make quicker decisions
Use less information to make decisions
Operate in smaller and more entrepreneurial organizations
Low Risk-taking Managers
Are slower to make decisions
Require more information before making decisions
Exist in larger organizations with stable environments
Risk Propensity
Aligning managers’ risk-taking propensity to job requirements should be beneficial to organizations.
14. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–13 Personality Types
15. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–14 Personality Types
16. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–15 Achieving Person-Job Fit
17. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–16 Holland’s Typology of PersonalityandCongruent Occupations
18. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–17 Relationships among Occupational Personality Types
19. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–18 Emotions- Why Emotions Were Ignored in OB The “myth of rationality”
Organizations are not emotion-free.
Emotions of any kind are disruptive to organizations.
Original OB focus was solely on the effects of strong negative emotions that interfered with individual and organizational efficiency.
20. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–19 What Are Emotions?
21. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–20 What Are Emotions? (cont’d)
22. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–21 Felt versus Displayed Emotions
23. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–22 Emotion Continuum The closer any two emotions are to each other on the continuum, the more likely people are to confuse them.
24. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–23 Emotion Dimensions Variety of emotions
Positive
Negative
Intensity of emotions
Personality
Job Requirements
Frequency and duration of emotions
How often emotions are exhibited.
How long emotions are displayed.
25. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–24 Gender and Emotions Women
Can show greater emotional expression.
Experience emotions more intensely.
Display emotions more frequently.
Are more comfortable in expressing emotions.
Are better at reading others’ emotions.
Men
Believe that displaying emotions is inconsistent with the male image.
Are innately less able to read and to identify with others’ emotions.
Have less need to seek social approval by showing positive emotions.
26. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–25 External Constraints on Emotions
27. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–26 Affective Events Theory (AET) Emotions are negative or positive responses to a work environment event.
Personality and mood determine the intensity of the emotional response.
Emotions can influence a broad range of work performance and job satisfaction variables.
Implications of the theory:
Individual response reflects emotions and mood cycles.
Current and past emotions affect job satisfaction.
Emotional fluctuations create variations in job satisfaction.
Emotions have only short-term effects on job performance.
Both negative and positive emotions can distract workers and reduce job performance.
28. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–27 Affective Events Theory (AET)
29. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–28 OB Applications of Understanding Emotions Ability and Selection
Emotions affect employee effectiveness.
Decision Making
Emotions are an important part of the decision-making process in organizations.
Motivation
Emotional commitment to work and high motivation are strongly linked.
Leadership
Emotions are important to acceptance of messages from organizational leaders.
30. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–29 OB Applications… (cont’d) Interpersonal Conflict
Conflict in the workplace and individual emotions are strongly intertwined.
Customer Services
Emotions affect service quality delivered to customers which, in turn, affects customer relationships.
Deviant Workplace Behaviors
Negative emotions lead to employee deviance (actions that violate norms and threaten the organization).
Productivity failures
Property theft and destruction
Political actions
Personal aggression
31. © 2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 4–30 Ability and Selection Emotional Intelligence (EI)
Self-awareness
Self-management
Self-motivation
Empathy
Social skills
Research Findings
High EI scores, not high IQ scores, characterize high performers.