1 / 58

Where is the learning in games

Presentation about 'Where is the learning in games'

SeriousPlayConf
Download Presentation

Where is the learning in games

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Where is the “learning” in games? Karl Kapp Professor: Bloomsburg University Author: Gamification of Learning and Instruction Twitter:@kkapp

  2. Related Resources… Web Site:www.karlkapp.com Books Lynda.com Course: Gamification of Learning YouTube Video

  3. Co-Founder Game Development Company. www.2klearning.com

  4. For: Notes/Slides Additional Ideas www.karlkapp.com www.karlkapp.com/kapp-notes

  5. Why might an educator use games for learning?

  6. Why might an educator use lectures for learning?

  7. Lectures are NOT effective for fostering higher level thinking? Gibbs, G., (1981). Twenty Terrible Reasons for Lecturing, SCED Occasional Paper No. 8, Birmingham. http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/resources/20reasons.html and Bligh, D., (1972). What’s the Use of Lectures?Penguin. Bloom, B. S., (1953). “Thought Processes in Lectures and Discussions.” Journal of General Education Vol. 7. Isaacs, G., (1994). “Lecturing Practices and Note-taking Purposes.” Studies in Higher Education, 19:2.

  8. During lectures students' thoughts involved attempting to solve problems, or synthesize or inter-relate information for 1% of the time. 78% of the lecture is spent in ‘passive thoughts about the subject’ and ‘irrelevant thoughts’.

  9. Lectures are not a very effective way of teaching in higher education – especially if the aim is to teach thinking, or to change attitudes or other higher aims beyond the simple transmission of factual knowledge.” 21 studies found lecturing to be less effective than: discussion, reading and individual work in class.

  10. Instruction with learning games yields higher gains in learning and retention than traditional instruction. Statistics are from: Sitzmann, T. (2011) A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology .Review of 65 studies Confirmed findings (not statistics): Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & vam der S[el. E.D. (2013), February 4). A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advanced online publication. Doi: 10.1037/a0031311 39 Studies. Review of 39 studies 54% conducted in the last year.

  11. Percentages of Impact Over Traditional Training Type of Knowledge /Retention Declarative Procedural Retention % Higher 11% 14% 9%

  12. Percentages of Impact Over Traditional Training Type of Knowledge /Retention Declarative Procedural Retention % Higher 17% Higher than Lectures 11% 14% 9% Discussion 5% Higher than

  13. Percentages of Impact Type of Knowledge /Retention Declarative Procedural Retention % Higher It wasn’t the game, it was level of activity in the game. 11% 14% 9% In other words, the engagement of the learner in the game leads to learning.

  14. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics Scott Freemana,1, Sarah L. Eddya, Miles McDonougha, Michelle K. Smithb, Nnadozie Okoroafora, Hannah Jordta, and Mary Pat Wenderotha. PNAS Early Edition (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

  15. Games can promote pro- social behaviors.

  16. First Experiment indicated that playing the game Darfur is Dying resulted in a greater willingness to help the Darfurian people than reading a text conveying same information. Peng, W., Lee, M., & Heeter. (2010) The effects of a serious game on role taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communications. 60, 723-724. Chapter 5 of “The Gamificaiton of Learning and Instruction.

  17. Second Experiment indicated that playing the game Darfur is Dying resulted in a greater role taking and willingness to help than either game watching or text reading. Peng, W., Lee, M., & Heeter. (2010) The effects of a serious game on role taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communications. 60, 723-724. Chapter 5 of “The Gamificaiton of Learning and Instruction.

  18. Fostering Pro-Social Behavior Greitemeyer, T. & Osswald, S. (2010) Effective of Prosocial games on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 98 . No. 2., 211-221.

  19. 28% helped to pick up pencils

  20. 33% helped to pick up pencils

  21. 67% helped to pick up pencils

  22. City Crisis

  23. 22% intervened

  24. 56% intervened

  25. Games Must be Embedded into the Curriculum to be Effective for Learning.

  26. Instructional games should be embedded in instructional programs that include debriefing and feedback. Engagement Instructional support to help learners understand how to use the game increases instructional effectiveness of the gaming Educational Simulation Game experience. Pedagogy Hays, R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion. Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (No 2005-004). Chapter 4 “The Gamification of Learning and Instruction.” Sitzmann, T. (2011) A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology .Review of 65 studies

  27. Example Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Sek E.D. (2013), (February 4). A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advanced online publication. Doi: 10.1037/a0031311 39 Studies.

  28. Games are more effective than traditional instruction when multiple sessions are involved.

  29. Conventional instruction for a one-off is better vs. one game session Multiple game sessions better than multiple conventional sessions Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & vam der S[el. E.D. (2013), February 4). A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advanced online publication. Doi: 10.1037/a0031311 39 Studies.

  30. Games are more effective than traditional instruction when players work in groups.

  31. With serious games, both learners playing individually and those playing in a group learn more than the comparison group, but learners who play serious games in a group learn more Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & vam der S[el. E.D. (2013), February 4). A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advanced online publication. Doi: 10.1037/a0031311 39 Studies.

  32. While playing a game, learners will voluntarily do harder problems and work.

  33. A math facts game deployed on a handled computer encouraged learners to complete greater number of problems at an increased level of difficulty. Learners playing the handheld game completed nearly 3 times the number of problems in 19 days and voluntarily increased the level of difficulty. Lee, J., Luchini, K., Michael, B., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). More than just fun and games: Assessing the value of educational video games in the classroom. Paper presented at the CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.

  34. What elements of games lead to learning?

  35. Challenge Jones, B., Valdez, G., Norakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1994). Designing learning and technology for educational reform. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncrtec.org/capacity/profile/profwww.htm and Schlechty, P. C. (1997). Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 2 “The Gamification of Learning and Instruction.”

  36. Flying around a virtual world as a superhero made subjects nicer in the real world. physical world Rosenberg, R.S. Baughman, S.L., Bailenson, J.N. (2013) Virtual Superheroes: Using Superpowers in Virtual Reality to Encourage Prosocial Behavior. PLOS One., 8(1), 1-9.

  37. Yep, People tend to remember facts more accurately if they encounter them in a story rather than in a list. Researchers have found that the human brain has a natural affinity for narrative construction. And they rate legal arguments as more convincing when built into narrative tales rather than on legal precedent. Carey, B. (2007) this is Your Life (and How You Tell it). The New York Times. Melanie Green http://www.unc.edu/~mcgreen/research.html. Chapter 2 “The Gamification of Learning and Instruction.

  38. Game Examples

  39. Timez Attack

  40. Dragon Box 2 Students who played at least 1.5 hours, 92.9% achieved mastery. Of those students who played at least 1 hour, 83.8% achieved mastery. Of those students who played at least 45 minutes, 73.4% achieved mastery. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jordanshapiro/2013/07/01/it-only-takes-about-42-minutes-to-learn-algebra-with-video-games/

  41. DimensionM educational video game series for math

  42. Students in the experimental group who played the Tabula Digita video games over an 18 week period scored significantly higher on district math benchmark tests than students in the control group who did not play the video games (p<.001). In fact, the increase in scores for the test group was more than double the increase in score for the control group.

  43. http://iit.bloomu.edu/NSFGame.html http://www.gaming2learn.org/

  44. Survival Master Results Mean Rating Before Mean Rating After Difference After- Before Task Calculate volume of 3-D shape 2.83 4.00 1.17 Calculate surface area of 3-D shape 2.33 3.83 1.50 Group Results by Assessment Pre Post .378 5 Understand concept of conductivity and heat flow Group 1.50 Final 3.82 2.32 Mean .447 .5136 Game Understand relationship between conductivity & heat flow. Std. Deviation .167 .168 .169 1.17 3.17 2.00 N 140 125 100 Apply heat flow formula 1.00 3.33 2.33 Understand difference between dead and live load 1.50 3.33 1.83

More Related