1 / 19

Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition

Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition. Michaël Mrissa (spokesman) - Philippe Thiran DBDBD’07. Outline. Introduction Web services & composition Semantic Web services Mediation challenges Objectives & contribution Proposition

Sharon_Dale
Download Presentation

Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition Michaël Mrissa (spokesman) - Philippe Thiran DBDBD’07

  2. Outline • Introduction • Web services & composition • Semantic Web services • Mediation challenges • Objectives & contribution • Proposition • Presentation of the context model • Context integration with Web services • General architecture • Mediation & Implementation overview • Conclusion & perspectives

  3. Web services & composition • Software components • Interaction model • Composition of Web services • Value-added composite Web services • Objective: answer complex user requests • No semantics yet… • UDDI repositories • WSDL descriptions • SOAP messages Registry Publish Find Travel planning Bind Consumer Provider WS Flight booking Hotel booking Addition

  4. Semantic Web services • The Semantic Web • Objectives • Better interoperability between information systems • Automation of information exchange • Means • Explicit machine-interpretable semantic descriptions • Relies on ontologies [Gruber, 1993] • Semantic description of Web Services • Semantic languages • OWL-S [Martin et al., 2004], WSMO [Arroyo and Stollberg, 2004], DIANE [Klein et al., 2005] • Annotation to existing formats • WSDL : SESMA [Peer and Vukovic, 2004], WSDL-S [Miller et al., 2004] • UDDI : [Paolucci and Kawamura, 2002]

  5. Mediation challenges • In a composition • Semantic mediation of exchanged data is required • Mediation between (semantic) Web services • IRS-III [Cabral and Domingue, 2005], • WSMX [Mocan et al., 2004] • Agent-based mediation [Williams et al., 2005] • Rule-based approach [Spencer et al., 2004] Travel planning Semantic heterogeneities Output Input Output Input Label conflicts Web Service 1 Web Service 2 PRICE (EUR) PRICE (USD) Unit & value conflicts

  6. Objectives & contribution • Multiple goals & constraints • Solve data semantic heterogeneities in a composition • Ease the task of Web services providers • Explicitly describe the semantics of Web services • Enable semantic mediation in composition • Proposition • Use context-based representation of data semantics • Rely on contextual ontologies • Annotate WSDL language with semantics • Detect semantic heterogeneities in the composition • Insert mediation mechanisms at the composition level

  7. Outline • Introduction • Web services & composition • Semantic Web services • Mediation challenges • Objectives & contribution • Proposition • Presentation of the context model • Context integration with Web services • General architecture • Mediation & Implementation overview • Conclusion & perspectives

  8. Presentation of the context model • Definition of “context” • Collection of semantic assumptions on data interpretation • How should a price be interpreted ? (VAT, currency, scale factor…) • The context model contains 4 elements • Semantic objects • Static modifiers • Dynamic modifiers • Conversion rules & functions • Characteristics of the model • Good integration with WSDL • Based on the MIX model [Bornhövd, 1999] • Definition of static and dynamic modifiers • Semantic conversion between semantic objects

  9. Presentation of the context model • A semantic object is a 4-tuple • A concept c defined in a domain ontology • A value v that contains the data itself • A type t that describes the actual type of the value • A context C that characterizes the semantic interpretation of S • C is described as a set of semantic objects • Semantic object in C are called modifiers • Modifiers are dynamic iff: Semantic object S = ( c, v, t, C ) ∀ v ∈ S, ∃ f:{Dom(t) ×...× Dom(t)} → Dom(t) ∧ ∃ {S1, ... Si, ... , Sn }, s.t. Si = <ci, vi, ti, Ci> ∈ Ctxt ∧ Si≠ S ∧ f(v1, ..., vi, ..., vn) = v.

  10. Presentation of the context model • A sample semantic object

  11. Presentation of the context model • Conversion possibilities between semantic objects • With context conversion functions • Change modifiers’ values • Dynamic aspect • May involve access to remote resources (e.g. currency conversions) • Stored as rules • With type conversion functions • Stored in conversion libraries • Related to the type system (XML Schema) • Semantic comparability • Over a common type and context • Different objects still comparable over limited context

  12. Presentation of the context model • Illustration with the travel planning example

  13. Context integration with Web services • Semantic annotation of WSDL metamodel

  14. Context integration with Web services • Illustration of our annotation • Excerpt of annotated WSDL document • Only static modifiers are added to the description <?xml version=``1.0" encoding=``UTF-8"?> <wsdl:definitions...>... <wsdl:message name=``HotelBookingTicket"> <wsdl:part name=``inputPrice" type=``xsd:double" ctxt:context=``dom1:Price ctxt1:France ctxt1:VATIncluded ctxt1:ScaleFactorOne"/> </wsdl:message>... </wsdl:definitions>

  15. Context integration with Web services • Context ontologies • Store context information for each domain concept • Updated by Web services’ providers • Separates top-down and bottom-up aspects

  16. Global architecture

  17. Mediation & Implementation overview • Prototype • Implementation of the travel planning example • Graphical annotation editor (WSDL4J API) • Development of the mediator

  18. Conclusion • A context-based solution for semantic mediation • A model for representing data • Separation of domain and context knowledge • Annotation of Web services’ descriptions • Mediation mechanisms • Future work • How to insert mediators into the composition ? • A first proposal relies on WS-BPEL analysis • A language-independent method ? • This model applies to Web services, but… • What about other semantic tools on the Web ? • Microformats, RDFa… • To what extent the context model applies to the WWW ?

  19. Thank you ! Any questions ? University of Namur http://www.fundp.ac.be PRECISE group http://www.fundp.ac.be/precise Contact : • Email addresses • michael.mrissa@fundp.ac.be • pthiran@fundp.ac.be • Authors’ web sites • http://www.fundp.ac.be/~mmrissa/ • http://www.fundp.ac.be/~pthiran/

More Related