1 / 39

Concept Testing

Concept Testing. Concept Testing Conjoint Analysis February 15 & 20, 2007. Evaluating with Customers. Concept Testing is used to help screen and refine new product ideas Conjoint Analysis used to determine the combination of attributes that maximizes appeal. Determine Customer

Sophia
Download Presentation

Concept Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Concept Testing Concept Testing Conjoint Analysis February 15 & 20, 2007

  2. Evaluating with Customers • Concept Testing • is used to help screen and refine new product ideas • Conjoint Analysis • used to determine the combination of attributes that maximizes appeal

  3. Determine Customer Interest Concept Testing • A concept is composed of attributes and benefits for a particularusage situation • Attributes incorporate a specific product form and technology • see Page and Rosenbaum (1992), “Developing an Effective Concept Testing • Program for Durables,” J Product Innovation Mgmt

  4. Purposes of Concept Testing • To identify very poor concepts so that they can be eliminated. • To estimate (at least crudely) the sales or trial rate the product would enjoy (buying intentions, early projection of market share). • To help develop the idea (e.g. make tradeoffs among attributes).

  5. Procedure for a Concept Test • Prepare concept statement • Clarify specific purposes • Decide format(s) • Select commercialization • Determine price(s) • Select respondent type(s) • Select response situation • Define the interview • Conduct trial interviews • Interview, tabulate, analyze

  6. Concept Testing Cautions and Concerns • If the prime benefit is a personal sense (aroma, taste). • If the concept involves new art and entertainment. • If the concept embodies a new technology that users cannot visualize. • If concept testing is mishandled by management, then blamed for product failure. • If customers simply do not know what problems they have.

  7. The Concept Statement • The Customer Value Proposition: • FOR{the ideal customer} • WHO{have the following problem} • MY PRODUCT IS A{product category} • THAT{key differentiating benefit} • UNLIKE{the major competitor} Product Usage Situation Customer

  8. The Concept Statement • Format • Narrative

  9. Narrative Here is a tasty, sparkling beverage that quenches thirst, refreshes, and makes the mouth tingle with a delightful flavor blend of orange, mint, and lime. It helps adults (and kids too) control weight by reducing the craving for sweets and between-meal snacks. And, best of all, it contains absolutely no calories. Comes in 12-ounce cans or bottles and costs 60 cents each. 1. How different, if at all, do you think this diet soft drink would be from other available products now on the market that might be compared with it? Very different ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Not at all different 2. Assuming you tried the product described above and liked it, about how often do you think you would buy it? More than once a week ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Would never buy it

  10. The Concept Statement • Narrative

  11. The Concept Statement • Format • Narrative • Drawing / Diagram

  12. Drawing/Diagram

  13. The Concept Statement • Format • Narrative • Drawing / Diagram • Model / Prototype • Virtual Reality

  14. Virtual Reality • Information Acceleration • http://www.wharton.upenn.edu/learning/futureview/

  15. Working Model Prototype Computer Paper & Pencil Developing Concepts to Test Number of items tested More 1 Most Preferred Least Preferred Time to prepare test materials e.g., www.acupoll.com

  16. yes yes Is it “believable”? Is it “unique”? Does it solve a “problem”? yes Would it be bought at one of several tested price points? yes BUYER What is generally tested? Can measure potential customer reactions using: (1) 5-pt “definitely not” - “definitely” scales (2) sorting tasks

  17. Considerations in the Concept Test • Core Idea vs. Positioning/Commercial Concept Statement • New Brand vs. Old Brand vs. No Brand • Concept statement: narrative, drawing, model? • Respondent group: Lead users? Large users? • Response situation: Where? How? • Purchase Measure Decisions: • Buyer Intent • Frequency • Price • Product Diagnostics • Attribute Diagnostics

  18. Ask the right people... The Chasm Sales Lead Users and Innovators vs. Mainstream Market time Early Market Mainstream Market Pragmatists Conservatives Technology Enthusiasts Visionaries See (1) Rogers (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (2) Moore (1991) Crossing the Chasm (3) www.chasmgroup.com

  19. Ask the right questions... • How important is the product “experience”? • Does the customer have to “touch & feel” the product to understand the benefits offered? “Simulate” the Experience

  20. How can concepts be tested? • Focus Groups • One-on-One Personal Interviews • Mall Intercept • Phone Interviews • Postal Surveys • Internet Surveys • Hybrids (e.g., phone-mail-phone) Compare in terms of: sample control, concept flexibility, cost see: (1) Pope (1993), Practical Marketing Research (2) McQuarrie (1996) The Market Research Toolbox

  21. Typical Analysis Category or Industry Purchase Intent Concept Norm Definitely Would Buy 27% 20% Probably Would Buy 43 40 Top Two Box 70% 60% Might or Might Not Buy 22% Probably Would Not Buy 5 Definitely Would Not Buy 3

  22. Summary of Concept Testing • Advantages • relatively easy to get customer input • can be used as an early screen for new product ideas • Limitations • not that helpful for the design and development of specific product forms • not as reliable for discontinuousinnovations

  23. Conjoint Analysis Primary benefit in addition to (or in lieu of) concept tests: forces a trade-off

  24. Conjoint Analysis • Can be used to quantify the relative importance of attributes • Can be used to help determine the combination of attributes that maximizes appeal • Relatively easy for incremental innovation • Requires experts or information accelerationfor discontinuous innovations see (1) Page and Rosenbaum (1987), “Redesigning Product Lines With Conjoint Analysis,” J Product Innovation Mgmt (2) www.sawtooth.com {Sawtooth Software}

  25. Major Assumptions • An offering is a bundle of attributes and benefits. An offering can be decomposed into a bundle of “features” for which “utility values” can be calculated. • The utility value of an offering is some simple function of the utilities of the offering’s “feature” levels. • Customers prefer the offering with the highest utility value.

  26. Conjoint: Steps 1 and 2 • Identify Relevant Attributes • Survey/Focus Group/Intuition • Salsa Example (Thickness, Color, Spiciness) • Identify Relevant Levels of Each Attribute • Thickness: Regular, Thick, Extra-Thick • Color: Red, Green • Spiciness: Mild, Medium-Hot, Extra Hot

  27. Create Profiles for each Combination • 3 thickness (reg., thick, extra-thick) • 2 color (red, green) • 3 spiciness (mild, med/hot, extra hot) • Leads to 3X2X3 = 18 Profiles

  28. Conjoint: Step 3 • Choose a Sample • Considerations: • Consumer Involvement • Typicality • Diversity (if multiple segments) • Expertise (if complex or discontinuous)

  29. Conjoint: Step 4 • Obtain Customer Judgements • Rank Order • Sort into categories • Rank the profiles within each category • Pair-wise Comparisons • Use a computer package to quickly hone in on important attributes

  30. Conjoint: Step 4 - Example

  31. Conjoint: Step 5 • Compute Individual Value Systems • Use MONANOVA for rank order data • Output in the form of standardized utilities

  32. Output Example

  33. Conjoint: Step 6 • Find the average utilities (part-worths) for each attribute • Intuition: Find the attribute with the biggest range in utilities across the different levels • Use graphs/calculations for importance measures • Be careful with averages • Segments may exist • Cluster Analysis can tell you

  34. Output Example

  35. Let’s consider golf balls... • distance and durability • durability and price • distance and control

  36. Conjoint Analysis • Average Average PriceDriving Ball Life Distance • 250 yards 54 holes $3.00 • 220 yards 36 holes $4.00 • 200 yards 18 holes $5.00

  37. Your“Optimal” Product Design Driving Distance of 200 yards Average Ball Life of 54 holes $5/sleeve See also Titleist’s Ball-Fitting and Wilson’s Custom Fit

  38. How can conjoint analysis be conducted? • One-on-One Personal Interviews • written or verbal concept descriptions • multimedia presentation of concepts • RTI’s TradeOff VR; Sawtooth’s Sensus TradeOff; MIT’s Information Acceleration • networked computer facilities • Moskowitz Jacobs • Mail • written concept descriptions • disk by mail • Internet • the future??

  39. Summary of Conjoint Analysis • Advantages • the relative importance of product features can be quantified using customer input • only need to test a relatively small number of actual product designs • Limitations • output is usually not directly linked to actual purchase

More Related