130 likes | 436 Views
F. G. H. K. L. M. I. A. B. C. D. E. Fault Tree Analysis Ver. 5 April 21, 2008 Team Members: Adrienne Belasco, Mitch Barnett, Urvi Patel, Dan Wilkinson Advisors: Richard Debski, PhD, Jan Grudziak, MD, PhD, Prerana Patel, MD. Failure Mode. Implementation Failure. Design Failure.
E N D
F G H K L M I A B C D E Fault Tree Analysis Ver. 5 April 21, 2008 Team Members: Adrienne Belasco, Mitch Barnett, Urvi Patel, Dan Wilkinson Advisors: Richard Debski, PhD, Jan Grudziak, MD, PhD, Prerana Patel, MD Failure Mode Implementation Failure Design Failure
A The screw does not improve healing conditions for the patient preexisting patient condition.
B Improper fitting between screw and removal device Machining Errors in Precision
Contamination during surgical implantation C The screw causes an infection Rejection of the material Material Biocompatibility Patient allergy
D Loosening of scews, decreased stability, and prolonged bone healing Vibration and shock during bone regeneration period post-removal surgery
E Screw shaft breaks due to high torques during removal Bone regeneration results in higher bone-screw adhesion than normal
F Torque generated by the surgeon is more than 10 Nm Bone regeneration results in higher bone-screw adhesion than normal
G Possible screw failure during bone regeneration period Surgeon place the screw at the wrong angle, resulting in added stress Bone regeneration results in higher bone-screw adhesion than normal
H Reduced effectiveness of screw in the alignment of the regenerating bone Pharmaceuticals may weaken bone
I Overgrowth of the bone results in inability to use removal device Natural bone regeneration
K Screw Stripping Bone regeneration results in higher than normal bone-screw adhesion
L Removal device breaks due to high torques during removal Bone regeneration results in higher bone-screw adhesion than normal
M Screw breakage in vivo Weakening of screw due to removal of material for second hexagonal socket