1 / 12

Intra-district Course Equivalencies

Intra-district Course Equivalencies. CHECKING IN ON. Courses Deemed “comparable” at Columbia College and Modesto Junior College. Letitia Senechal Miller MJC Articulation Officer March 28, 2017. Intra-District Equivalencies:.

Sophia
Download Presentation

Intra-district Course Equivalencies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Intra-district Course Equivalencies CHECKING IN ON Courses Deemed “comparable” atColumbia College and Modesto Junior College Letitia Senechal Miller MJC Articulation Officer March 28, 2017

  2. Intra-District Equivalencies: Courses identified as comparablebetween MJC and Columbiafor the purpose of satisfying: • Degree/Certificate requirements • Prerequisites • General Education Breadth requirements

  3. 2017-2018 Currently, MJC courses* are deemed equivalent to Columbia courses 223 *Some equivalencies are in process at the time of this presentation

  4. District Equivalency Process • Faculty, staff, or students identify potential equivalencies • One college requests that discipline faculty review CORs for equivalency • The other college reviews and accepts/declines request • Paper documents signed/filed in the MJC Articulation office • Equivalency is formalizedwith publication in both college catalogs and on the MJC website

  5. C-ID Equivalency Reciprocity If a statewide C-ID is gleaned for a given course at both colleges, equivalency is considered automatic

  6. How A&R Processes Equivalencies • A CC ► MJC student requests evaluation of the CC transcript • Evaluation Team identifies MJC-equivalent courses as “transfer” coursework • Evaluations Team builds a database record establishing CC course equivalency to a specific MJC course • Via the MJC course ID, course is “plugged in” to satisfy campus requirements in degree audit, prerequisites, etc.

  7. “IS THERE A problem, Articulation Officer?” Once equivalencies are identified, they are in place indefinitelyand are not reconsidered, so • Course changes may degrade equivalency over time • Approval for GE breadth, C-ID, articulation may differ • Requisites may not match, affecting transfer preparation • Unit values may differ • Courses may have different levels of rigor (transfer, vocational, non-transfer)

  8. Challenges • COR audit is needed to determine breadth and depth of misalignment with existing equivalencies • Current process to review and transcript YCCD equivalencies is cumbersome, and; • Current technological and human processes can overlook hidden misalignments, adversely affecting GE completion, prerequisite preparation, transfer preparation, and rigor

  9. Responding to Challenges • MJC Instruction Office will audit CORs and equivalencies in late spring • Discrepancies will be presented to both faculties for review • Final determinations will be made about existing equivalencies by both colleges via a process TBD

  10. Possible Opportunities • MJC is the custodian of YCCD equivalencies and can shape future tools • Might CurricUNET facilitate more centralized review of equivalencies? The question is in! • MJC and CC decide on new process(es) and criteria for establishing and maintaining appropriate equivalencies • Also, the colleges faculties are discussing viability of a common curricular framework • An intelligent scheduled review process may provide a logical starting point

  11. Next STEPS?

More Related