270 likes | 512 Views
2. OSMA Value. Advocating for physiciansPromoting a positive imagePractice services that save time and money. Value
E N D
1. PLUS Medical Professional Liability Symposium D, Brent Mulgrew
Executive Director
OSMA
2. 2
3. 3 Professional Liability Crisis’Critical Condition’
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9 What we’re seeing in Ohio “Soaring malpractice premiums stun many doctors”…USA Today
10. 10 What we’re seeing in Ohio “Malpractice-insurance rates in Cleveland among highest in nation”…Cleveland Plain Dealer
11. 11 What we’re hearing in Ohio
12. 12 What we’re hearing in Ohio
13. 13 The Ohio physician’s experience
14. 14 The impact… Increased expenses
Time poverty
Revenue remains flat to declining
Reduced income
Decreased access to patient care
discontinuing some procedures (96%)
leaving for less litigious areas (15%)
quitting the practice all together (51%)
15. 15 Ohio’s PLI History 1974-75 PLI availability disappears
OSMA’s response: Omnibus HB 682-Medical
Multiple tort reform provisions-4yr S/L, Pretrial Arb, limitations on experts, voluntary arb. 250K cap
most sections declared unconstitutional 1980
OSMA establishes physician owned PLI company
Multiple entrants in marketplace by1980-Availability increasing, price increases slow to inflation
1982-86 Market tightens, prices spike
OSMA’s response: Broad based Tort Reform
include business coalitions
16. 16 History 1990--Held unconstitutional, but prices stable
OSMA’s response: 1995 HB 350 Broad based Tort Reform--Unconstitutional 1999
Do you detect a pattern??
Without changing the Supreme Court--legislation is useless
2001-02 Market deteriorates as prices spike and availability disappears
17. 17 Action taken…
18. 18 The OSMA’s response…
19. 19 Senate Bill 281 Limits noneconomic damage awards in the vast majority of cases to $350,000
: In most cases, noneconomic damages against a health-care provider will be limited to $350,000. (No limits are set on economic damages.) The reasonable reforms contained in the bill will bring predictability to an otherwise unpredictable medical liability system, thereby stabilizing the volatile insurance market. Also, defense attorneys predict that because of the proof required for successful derivative claims, it will be more difficult to win those upper-limit awards.: In most cases, noneconomic damages against a health-care provider will be limited to $350,000. (No limits are set on economic damages.) The reasonable reforms contained in the bill will bring predictability to an otherwise unpredictable medical liability system, thereby stabilizing the volatile insurance market. Also, defense attorneys predict that because of the proof required for successful derivative claims, it will be more difficult to win those upper-limit awards.
20. 20 Senate Bill 281 Requires attorney contingency fees to be reviewed by a probate court if the fees exceed the noneconomic damage awards
This provision is intended to protect against having attorney fees taken out of any economic damage money that is awarded to the patient.This provision is intended to protect against having attorney fees taken out of any economic damage money that is awarded to the patient.
21. 21 Senate Bill 281 Establishes a statute of repose
Presently, physicians could be liable for injuries that occurred 10, 20, even 30 years ago. Now, a patient has to discover the injury and file a claim within four years. Any claim that is older than four years will be barred, except for cases involving minors and persons of unsound mind.Presently, physicians could be liable for injuries that occurred 10, 20, even 30 years ago. Now, a patient has to discover the injury and file a claim within four years. Any claim that is older than four years will be barred, except for cases involving minors and persons of unsound mind.
22. 22 Senate Bill 281 Protects physicians from the notice of a claim being used against him/her
The 180-day notice of intent is in current law. The fact that insurance companies may not use the notices of “intent to sue” against physicians in setting rates is new.
The 180-day notice of intent is in current law. The fact that insurance companies may not use the notices of “intent to sue” against physicians in setting rates is new.
23. 23 Senate Bill 281 Allows evidence of collateral source payments
Juries will now be able to consider if the patient is receiving money from other sources before setting awards for damages. This should result in lower awards, and will prevent double recovery.
Juries will now be able to consider if the patient is receiving money from other sources before setting awards for damages. This should result in lower awards, and will prevent double recovery.
24. 24 Senate Bill 281 Provides for periodic payment of future damages
This structured settlement option will help the patient in meeting his or her long-term financial and medical needs. It also means that physicians will not be forced to pay out large settlement amounts at one time.
This structured settlement option will help the patient in meeting his or her long-term financial and medical needs. It also means that physicians will not be forced to pay out large settlement amounts at one time.
25. 25 Senate Bill 281 Strengthens Ohio’s current arbitration law
Patients can now be asked to sign an agreement that says any dispute over the outcome of a medical procedure or treatment would be handled through arbitration, and that both parties would agree to the decision made by the impartial third party. Such an agreement would become irrevocable after 30 calendar days. (Current law allowed revocation up to 90 days after the last treatment.) The OSMA will work on creating a model binding arbitration agreement form for use by its members.
Patients can now be asked to sign an agreement that says any dispute over the outcome of a medical procedure or treatment would be handled through arbitration, and that both parties would agree to the decision made by the impartial third party. Such an agreement would become irrevocable after 30 calendar days. (Current law allowed revocation up to 90 days after the last treatment.) The OSMA will work on creating a model binding arbitration agreement form for use by its members.
26. 26 Related Tort Reform Legislation Senate Bill 120
Removes joint and several liability
In other words, in most cases, a physician who is named in a suit will only be held liable for the portion of the claim for which he or she may be responsible
Senate Bill 179
Provides a broader base of peer review protections
Allows health-care entities outside the traditional hospital setting to establish peer review committees
The activities are protected from discovery during litigation
27. 27 IMPACT
No reduction in rates or trend
Increased numbers of failure to renew
Selective underwriting of risks/specialties
Increased demand for hospital provided ins.
Credit history/psychological prescreens
Creation of new nonstandard market options
Risk retention groups, off shore or friendly state captives and OWAs.
Ohio Hospital Assn. Creates new options for physicians through their institutions