110 likes | 278 Views
E CM bias in the presence of Beamstrahlung. Arik Florimonte, UCSC Mike Woods , SLAC. WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider Jan. 6-8, 2005 SLAC . Wakefields, Disruption and y-z Kink instability. Disruption parameter is ratio of
E N D
ECMbias in the presence of Beamstrahlung Arik Florimonte, UCSC Mike Woods, SLAC WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider Jan. 6-8, 2005 SLAC MDI Workshop @ SLAC
Wakefields, Disruption and y-z Kink instability Disruption parameter is ratio of bunch length to focal length: Linac wakefields generate “banana” beam distortions (larger for NLC than for TESLA) NLC example TESLA example (larger for TESLA than for NLC) MDI Workshop @ SLAC
Summary of ECM Bias studies w/ Beamstrahlung OFF E1 and E2 are beam energies measured by the energy spectrometers. (ISR and beamstrahlung are turned off for this study.) Wakefields + Disruption Y-Z Kink instability E-Spread + E-Z correlation + Y-Z Kink instability ECM Bias Summary of ECMbias MDI Workshop @ SLAC
NLC TESLA Summary of ECMbias NLC’ MDI Workshop @ SLAC
E1 and E2 are beam energies measured by the energy spectrometers. (ISR and beamstrahlung are turned off for this study.) Definition of ECMbias (Beamsstrahlung OFF) Definition of ECMbias (Beamsstrahlung ON) ECM for NLC-500 Vary cutoff energy from 480-495 GeV MDI Workshop @ SLAC
ECM Bias versus Vertical Offset of Colliding Beams MDI Workshop @ SLAC
Study of distributions for i) ECM (cannot measure this) ii) E1-E2 (closely related to Bhabha acolinearity) NLC NLC w/ random-ordered energy NLC NLC w/ random-ordered energy Negligible difference in 2 distributions Clear difference in 2 distributions NLC NLC w/ random-ordered energy Tails are similar in both E1+E2 and E1-E2 distributions NLC NLC w/ random-ordered energy MDI Workshop @ SLAC
Study of distributions for i) ECM (cannot measure this) ii) E1-E2 (closely related to Bhabha acolinearity) TESLA TESLA w/ random- ordered energy TESLA TESLA w/ random- ordered energy Clear difference in 2 distributions Negligible difference in 2 distributions TESLA TESLA w/ random-ordered energy Tails are similar in both E1+E2 and E1-E2 distributions TESLA TESLA w/ random-ordered energy MDI Workshop @ SLAC
Study of distributions for i) ECM (cannot measure this) ii) E1-E2 (closely related to Bhabha acolinearity) NLC’ NLC’ w/ random-ordered energy NLC’ NLC’ w/ random-ordered energy Clear difference in 2 distributions Competing/cancelling ECM bias contributions NLC’ NLC’ w/ random-ordered energy Tails are similar in both E1+E2 and E1-E2 distributions NLC’ NLC’ w/ random-ordered energy MDI Workshop @ SLAC
Summary of ECMbias without Beamsstrahlung Summary of ECMbias in presence of Beamsstrahlung → Energy spectrometers and Bhabha acolinearity alone are not sufficient to correct for this bias. Need beam dynamics modeling and other input from annihilation data, disrupted energy measurements, … MDI Workshop @ SLAC