1 / 14

Rotor Design Approaches

Rotor Design Approaches. Michael S. Selig Associate Professor . Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999  NREL NWTC, Golden, CO.

Thomas
Download Presentation

Rotor Design Approaches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rotor Design Approaches Michael S. Selig Associate Professor Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs Selig, Tangler, and Giguère August 2, 1999  NREL NWTC, Golden, CO

  2. Outline • Design Problems • Approaches to Design • Inverse Design

  3. Design Problems • Retrofit Blades • Trade Studies and Optimization

  4. Approaches to Design • Design by Analysis - Working “Forward” • Example HAWT Codes: PROP, PROP93, WT_PERF, PROPID

  5. Inverse Design - Working “Backward” • Requires some knowledge of desirable aerodynamic characteristics • Example HAWT Code: PROPID

  6. Optimization • Example problem statement: Maximize the annual energy production subject to various constraints given a set of design variables for iteration • Example Code: PROPGA

  7. Design Variables  Desire a method that allows for the specification of both independent and dependent variables

  8. From an Inverse Design Perspective • Through an inverse design approach (e.g., PROPID), blade performance characteristics can be prescribed so long as associated input variables are given up for iteration. • Examples: • Iterate on: To achieve prescribed: Rotor radius  Rotor peak power Twist distribution  Lift coefficient distribution Chord distribution  Axial inflow distribution

  9. Caveats • Some knowledge of the interdependence between the variables is required, e.g. the connection between the twist distribution and lift coefficient distribution. • Not all inverse specifications are physically realizable. For example, a specified peak power of 1 MW is not consistent with a rotor having a 3-ft radius.

  10. Iteration Scheme • Multidimensional Newton iteration is used to achieve the prescribed rotor performance • Special "Tricks" • Step limits can be set to avoid divergence • Iteration can be performed in stages • Parameterization of the input allows for better convergence

  11. PROPID for Analysis • Traditional Independent Variables (Input) • Number of Blades • Radius • Hub Cutout • Chord Distribution • Twist Distribution • Blade Pitch • Rotor Rotation Speed (rpm) or Tip-Speed Ratio • Wind Speed • Airfoils

  12. Traditional Dependent Variables - Sample (Output) • Power Curve • Power Coefficient Cp Curve • Rated Power • Maximum Power Coefficient • Maximum Torque • Lift Coefficient Distribution • Axial Inflow Distribution • Blade L/D Distribution • Annual Energy Production • Etc • Each of these dependent variables can also be prescribed using the inverse capabilities of PROPID

  13. Aerodynamic Design Considerations • Clean vs. Rough Blade Performance • Stall Regulated vs. Variable Speed • Fixed Pitch vs. Variable Pitch • Site Conditions, e.g. Avg. Wind Speed and Turbulence • Generator Characteristics, e.g., Small Turbines, Two Speed

  14. Common Design Drivers • Generator  Peak Power • Gearbox  Max Torque • Noise  Tip Speed • Structures  Airfoil Thickness • Materials  Geometric Constraints • Cost

More Related