250 likes | 684 Views
Communication Accommodation Theory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-yjNdRAQzI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXQzuom6sAg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcqUn79eGL4. What is it?. The identification of a culture What is your race? What culture do you identify with?. How we communicate.
E N D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-yjNdRAQzI • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXQzuom6sAg • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcqUn79eGL4
What is it? • The identification of a culture • What is your race? • What culture do you identify with? • How we communicate
Convergents or Divergence? • Who conforms? • Who decides? • And what does it all mean?
Ok so there is a down side… • Social appropriateness • + and - • Norms • And the consequences…
In and out • “so, like..she said, that I said, that like I was like and she was like, and then I was like and ehhhhhhhh.” • A division of groups • In groups and out groups • Football • Starbucks • Techies • URL, AC/DC, . • ADC, Gbps, POTS
FACE it • Ya ya we know chapter 3… the “saving face” • Face concern dilemma • Keeping the balance of individualism and collectivism • Status
UNEXPECTED BUT AUTHENTIC USE OF AN ETHNICALLY-MARKED DIALECT
RESEARCHER • Who: Julie Sweetland • Where:Stanford University, Calif.
“AAVE” • It stands for African American Vernacular English
STUDY • ETHNOGRAPHY: Complete Observer • Delilah-23 Year old white female
EXAMPLE SPEECH PATTERNS • DELILAH SAYS, “ YOU KNOW HOW VIKKI GETS DRUNK, ALWAYS WANNA START SOMETHIN, OR AT LEAST ALWAYS END UP STARTIN SOMETHIN.”
Results • MORPHOSYNTACTIC FEATURES: • Study of internal structure of words. • PHONOLOGICAL FEATURES: • Sound system of a specific language
Researcher • Who: Kirsten Robertson Tamar Murachver • Where: University of Otago
Purpose This study is to examine children’s gendered language during middle childhood and how this is influenced by linguistic and social context.
Hypothesis • Hypothesis 1: Children would change their speech to become more similar to that employed by the experimenter. • Hypothesis 2: Children might accommodate their speech to experimenter gender; however , the influence was expected to be less than that of the experimenter.
Hypothesis 3: Older children would accommodate more than younger children to the gender-preferential speech style of the experimenter. • Hypothesis 4: Boys with strong stereotyped beliefs would accommodate less to the speech style of the experimenter than would boys who did not hold strong sex role beliefs.
Method • Participants • Experimenter speech style manipulation • Procedure • Coding
Results • Experimenter speech styles manipulations • Children speech behavior • Stereotype results
Conclusion • Children accommodate their speech style depending on who they are talking to regardless if they were talking to someone who was or wasn't pertaining to their gender. • Second, when speech style was controlled, the children’s speech did not vary as a function of their own or the experimenters gender • Last, the finding show how gendered beliefs shape conversational behavior.