1 / 29

Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja

Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja. M. Yamauchi IRF-Kiruna. * Motivation / Examples * Distribution (mainly in nightside) * Unusual events (dayside). Phobos-2 (ASPERA) observation of two type of oxygen escape.

Download Presentation

Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja M. Yamauchi IRF-Kiruna * Motivation / Examples * Distribution (mainly in nightside) * Unusual events (dayside)

  2. Phobos-2 (ASPERA) observation of two type of oxygen escape

  3. We know that oxygen is escaping with much higher rate than thermal escape model predicts ==> However, oxygen budget between Earth and space has barely been studied despite its obvious importance on: * evolution of Earth, planets, satellites * modelling ancient Earth (astrobiology issue) * environmental issue * energy and mass transfer from the solar wind * plasma and molecular circulation, etc. Why does Earth have so much Oxygen while Mars have so little?

  4. Oxygen Budget/Circulation: • O+ supply from oxides (e.g., CO2 and SiO2). • * Oxygen escape / energization mechanism: • Thermal (Jean) escape vs Non-thermal escape (night & cusp) • * Role of the escaped oxygen in space: • e.g., Mass-loading effect by escaped ions. • * Oxygen circulation in the inner magnetosphere: • If oxygen does not return, Earth should have lost its atmosphere. • Simplest assumption = geomagnetic field push it back • * Oxygen precipitation into the ionosphere: • Very few works ==> this is today's topic

  5. Commonly-found ion injections near or equatorward of the nightside auroral zone. (a) With heavy ions dominant.

  6. Commonly-found ion injections near or equatorward of the nightside auroral zone. (b) With proton dominant.

  7. Analyses is simple and straight forward Look at all the data and * Check the distribution and statitistics * Further study on the exceptional cases But no work was published during past 15 years except 1 cusp paper. I don’t understand why.

  8. Distribution of heavy ion injections in 1° x 1h bin. Total number of traversals with clear injection events at each bin is scaled by the size of the square. The number with # is the orbit number.

  9. Distribution of heavy ion injection events at 0.1-10 keV range. * Nightside preference * Some exceptions in dayside This is not the artifact of Freja orbit with inclination of 63°because most injections are found inside CPS, a region far equatorward from the polar cap boundary.

  10. Unusual event #1 and #2: Kp=7+, IMF ≈ 50 nT.

  11. AE and ASY indices (12-hour plot) before the event #1 and #2: The thick vertical line indicates the Freja observation of the injection event.

  12. #1. Midday Heavy Ion Injection Event * during extremely high magnetospheric activity * strong dawnward IMF => cusp (≈ substantial magnetic noon) is shifted toward dawn * Mono-energetic heavy ion injection (0.3-1 keV range) is observed at 13 MLT (13:31:30 UT). * Eenergy band (width in %) of injecting ions is about the same for proton and heavy ions ==> only one species despite during mgnetic storm. * The energy ratio between the injecting heavy ion and proton species is constant at about 15-20. ==> O+ rather than N+ or C+ if originate from the same region. * This is not the stagnant plasma injection (SPI) event which is recognized at 13:28:25-13:29:20 UT in the proton channel.

  13. Two possible interpretations for monotonic energy-time dispersion

  14. (a) TOF case : ∆T = HTOF / V//2 - HTOF / V//1 or HTOF = ∆T * V//2 * V//1 / ∆V// note : pitch-angle dependence

  15. (b) simple VF case L1,2 / VC = HVF / V//1,2 , L2 - L1 = ∆T * Vsat therefore HVF / V//2 - HVF / V//1 = ∆T * Vsat / VC or HVF = HTOF * Vsat / VC L1,2 = HTOF * Vsat / V//1,2

  16. Downgoing ions of ≈ 300 eV (60 km/s for O+) at L=7 : 0.32 keV@13:31:30 UT & 0.18 keV@ 13:32:06 UT (6 spin) ==> * Time-of-flight (TOF) distance ≈ 1 Re Unrealistic * Velocity filter (VF) distance > 10 Re Location: ==> equitorial/opposite hemisphere

  17. Peculiarity * Dayside location ==> Where do they come from? * Heavy ions are registered first (at higher latitude) before protons are registered (at lower latitude). ==> What is the mass-filtering mechanism? * Only O+ but not N+ despite storm condition ==> What causes N+ escape at all? * Only this event during entire Freja mission ==> What is the peculiarity of this period?

  18. Possible sources and transport routes for the dayside heavy ions:

  19. Discussion on event #1 (1) Peculiarity of this period? Unusually strong dawnward IMF (≈ 50nT) Major storm (but many other periods as well) (2) Source location * nightside ==> difficult * dayside same hemishpere ==> difficult * opposite hemosphere = cusp! ==> possible (note: northern/southern cusp = prenoon/postnoon) (3) Source mechanism? * Non.thermal escape from the cusp (but why selective to O+?) (4) Mass-filtering mechansim? ????

  20. #2. Heavy Ion Injection Adjacent to the Cusp * during extremely high magnetospheric activity * Another heavy ion injection is observed adjacent to the cusp (13:27:20 UT). * Among more than 100 cusps observed by Freja, this is the only one with heavy ion injection at different energy from H+ * the oxygen energy is lower than the proton energy (both at 13:27:30 UT) contrary to the common cases observed by FAST (McFadden et al., 2003). ==> We cannot identify the source mechanism and the source region for this specific case: * drifted ions from the nightside? * escaping ionospheric ions reflected at high-altitude cusp? * escaping ions from the opposite hemisphere? * ???

  21. Freja (h=1700km) - FAST (h=2000-4000km) discrepancy: Only FAST detected O+ during magnetic storms ==> possible explanations are: * Downgoing O+ in the cusp is higher than the upper energy threshold of Freja (e.g., ring current origin)? * Loss process (e.g., mirror reflection and charge-exchange) right above Freja is more important for O+ than for H+? * Thermalization right above Freja is so strong that Freja can register H+/O+ in a wide energy range to overlap each other? * Strong O+ injection occurs only for special magnetic storms. At present we have no answer to the FAST-Freja discrepancy. ==> To solve this problem, we need another low-altitude satellite (< 2000 km) with a 3-D mass-resolving ion spectrometer with high energy and pitch-angle resolutions.

  22. Unusual event #3: Kp = 6-. The third panel is energetic (10-100 keV) ions

  23. #3. Multiple Heavy Ion Dispersion Event * Two outstanding features in the heavy ion channel: (1) wedge-like dispersed structure of trapped oxygen at around 18:47 UT (52-58 CGLat) (2) the overlapping and diverging energy-time dispersions at 18:50:10 - 18:52:30 UT (61-65 CGLat). * They are injections (downgoing count >> upgoing count) * No H+ signature = exclusively a heavy ion (O+ or N+) event. * They are multiple injections with different dispersion strength. 18:50:10 UT (0.56 keV => 0.13 keV in 12s) => TOF=10s 18:50:25 UT (1.0 keV => 0.24 keV in 24s) => TOF=25s 18:50:40 UT (2.4 keV => 0.32 keV in 75s) => TOF=45s ==> Simultaneous start times (18:49:55-18:50:00 UT) * TOF distance < 1000 km * No similar observation during entire Freja mission.

  24. Same event: blow-up of 3 different sectors’ heavy ion data: ±45° pitch-angle, upward direction, and downward direction.

  25. AE and ASY indices (12-hour plot) before the event #3 : The thick vertical line indicates the Freja observation of the injection event.

  26. * Rather in the oblique direction than in the downgoing direction * Detected during one of two half-spin periods (non-gyrotropic). note: O+ gyro frequency at 1700km ~ hundred Hz ==> Phase-mixing when travelling > 1s ==> Yet not gyrotropic ==> Are they really injection events or heating by wave? ==> But interpreting then as wave signature is even harder. Non-gyrotropic distribution + downgoing flux suggests very anisotropic source (beam-like) and: (1) perpendicular convection is extremely large (~ 100 km/s), ==> very unlikely(no signature of fast convection) (2) Anisotropy of the source distribution was maintained ~ 1min. ==> single source with three directions of beams ==> Injection must has large perpendicular component. (3) Very close source (several tens gyro period <1s, i.e., <100km) ==> multiple source

  27. Short source distance (<1000km) makes it difficult to be detected by other spacecrafts (e.g. Viking and FAST) , and the ground. Victoria (closest station from the foot-point of Freja during event ) does not show any specific intensification.

  28. Summary of heavy ion injection events * Surveyed entire Freja data (1992.10-1994.10) * Nightside preference * Some unusual event in dayside (1) O+ injection at 13 MLT followed by H+ injections. VF source > 10 Re (TOF distance ~ 1 Re). From the southern dayside ionosphere Mass-filtering mechanism is unknown. (2) O+ injection (lower energy than H+) adjacent to the cusp Freja-FAST discrepancy (3) Overlapping heavy ion injection with diverging dispersion In oblique non-gyrotropic directions Sudden localized anisotropic energization at < 1000 km. Generation mechanism is completely unknown.

More Related