1 / 16

FitSki

FitSki. Design Team. Project Sponsor: Dr. Mark Richter, MAX Mobility Faculty Advisor: Dr. Paul King, Vanderbilt University. Group Members: Lorielle Alter BME Cory Gerken ME Lauren Mitchell CompE Nick Pilkington ME Katy Serowka BME. Current Design. Current Design - Cage.

abbot-maddox
Download Presentation

FitSki

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FitSki

  2. Design Team Project Sponsor: Dr. Mark Richter, MAX Mobility Faculty Advisor: Dr. Paul King, Vanderbilt University Group Members: Lorielle Alter BME Cory Gerken ME Lauren Mitchell CompE Nick Pilkington ME Katy Serowka BME

  3. Current Design

  4. Current Design - Cage

  5. Current Design – Foot Restraint Foot Restraint

  6. Design Problem Flaws in the Current Design • Safety Issues • Back Injuries • Ankle/Leg Injuries • Hardware Issues • Poor Interface • Foot Restraints • Comfort Issues • No Adjustability • High Impact • Chafing

  7. Design Goals • To redesign the current FitSki incorporating four major components: • Enhanced safety for the skier • Reduction of the shock loading on the skier • Improvement of the interfacing of the FitSki with the board surface • Increased seating comfort

  8. First Prototype Meeting the Design Goals • New foothold design • Shock absorber placed beneath the seat • Wakeboard-like pads for the interface • New strap-in design, padded seat, and shock absorber

  9. First Iteration Seat Design • Stiff design • Not able to fit all sizes • Uncomfortable • Expensive

  10. Revised Seat Design • Adjust to various sizes • Increased padding • Prevents back injuries • Compatible with our design • Affordable

  11. Costs

  12. Background • Adaptive water skiing has grown into a popular recreational activity for people with disabilities who experience an increased quality of life when they can be involved in physically active recreational activities. In the Healthy People 2010 report there is a strong emphasis on the need for physical activity for all people because of its close relationship to health and well being. Enhancing the accessibility and safety of outdoor recreation activities, such as water skiing, for people with disabilities will ensure that they have access to all of the health benefits that a physically active lifestyle provides. • Project Website: www.bme.vanderbilt.edu/srdesign/2005/group5

  13. Target Users • Physically Disabled Persons • All who desire the freedom and excitement that able-bodied skiers enjoy but cannot ski using traditional equipment due to a physical impairment • Includes those paralyzed from waist down, chest down, and even neck down • Nashville Users ~ 25-35

  14. Quality Function Diagram

  15. Current Work • Testing of our prototype • RESNA competition requirements • Final report and Design Day preparations

  16. Future Work • Examine feasability of second prototype construction from results of first testing • RESNA competition • Final Paper and Design Day

More Related