220 likes | 366 Views
Government Roles in Risk Management for Public Sector Construction — Experiences in Leading Countries 政府在公共建設風險管理中之必要角色 -先進國家經驗的學習. 周慧瑜. 25 Apr. 2007. Why Risk Management in Government is Important?. Why Risk Management in Government is Important?.
E N D
Government Roles in Risk Management for Public Sector Construction— Experiences in Leading Countries政府在公共建設風險管理中之必要角色-先進國家經驗的學習 周慧瑜 25 Apr. 2007
Why Risk Management in Government is Important? Improving public services through better construction & Improving construction performance through better risk management
Why Risk Management in Government is Important? • the focus of risk management? • the bodies responsible for managing risks? • Tick box- the culture of risk management?
Why Risk Management in Government is Important? • Help departments improve their public service delivery in a number of ways: • Better service delivery • More efficient use of resources • Better project management • Minimum waste and fraud • More value for money • Innovation
What Has been Done in Taiwan? • 8th Aug., 2005- “Risk Management Implementation Project in the Administrative Agencies (行政機關風險管理推動方案)” • Timetable: End of 2005- identified 3-5 main risks, and built risk management framework for one of the risks. End of 2006- Risk profiles End of 2007- Integrated risk management framework.
What Has been Done in Taiwan? • From 2nd half-year of 2005- RDEC (Research, Development, and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yean; 行政院研考會): • Consultant and advisor • Seminar or training programs • Risk management guide • Risk management Knowledge Network (風險管理知識網) • Inquiry hotline
RDEC & ITRI: Risk Management Technical Note (風險管理作業手冊) 2005/10 →Version 1 2006/11 →Version 2 行政機關風險管理研討會 (2005/5) 95年度行政機關風險管理研習班 專業研習班 (2005/11 & 2006/7) 進階研習班 (2006/7) 主管研習班 (2006/9) 95年行政機關風險管理標竿學習觀摩會 (2006/11) What Has been Done in Taiwan?
What Has been Done in Leading Countries? • National Standards • 1995 Australia & New Zealand: now AS/NZS 4360:1999 • 1997 Canada: CAN/CSA-Q850:1997 • 2000 UK: BS-6079-3:2000 PD6668:2000 • 2001 Japan: JIS Q 2001:2001 • Risk Management Standards Define: • Risk management process • Activities underpin the process • Guidance on tools and techniques
The Risk Management Framework in UK Government CORPORATE DECISION-MAKING GROUPS DEPARTMENTS CENTRAL SUPPORT Other Information Customer: Ministers & Senior Officials Policy & Plan Domestic Horizon Scanning Committee Civil Contingencies Secretariat (CCS) Horizon Scanning Intelligence and Assessments Assessments Assessing Risks Strategy Unit Joint Intelligence Committee Assessments Joint Assessment Staff CCS helps with contingency planning and crisis Reviewing & Reporting Risks Handling Risks Need for Resilience building Intelligence and assessments Draft Plans & Progress Information PSX Treasury Spending Teams & Delivery Unit Plans Evaluation of Current Practice Improved Capabilities Agreed/Adjusted Plans & Resources Departmental Risk Support Risk Improvement Program Progress Information Civil Service Management Board Risk Support Team (Treasury) Developing Risk Management Capabilities Guidance & Training, etc
Public Assessments of the Government’s Handling of Certain Risks Q: Which of these issues, if any, do you think have been handled successfully/ unsuccessfully by the government?
Public Trusts in Information Sources on BSE • Q: How thinking about BSE, which two or three, if any, of these sources would you trust most/ least to advise you on the risks posed by BSE?
How can UK government Make Progress inRisk ManagementforPublic Sector Construction?
How can UK governmentMake Progress? • Institutionalizing risk assessment • Standardization of project review process • Revolution of procurement system
Institutionalizing Risk Assessment • 2002 Green Book • advice on appraisal and evaluation process for Central Government • to promote efficient policy development and resource allocation across government • Six stages to ensure the assessments consistent and transparent • Rationale • Objectives • Appraisal • Monitoring • Evaluation • Feedback • Cost benefit analysis is used here to choose the best (the highest NPV) option of proposals, and the NPV should be adjusted by considering risks in each option.
Standardization of Project Review Process • Assessing Risks Through OGC Gateway Reviews • Red Amber Green (RAG) ratings (Red) the project team has to take action immediately (Amber) the project can go forward and provided recommendations have to be responded to before the next review (Green) the project is on target except for minor matters
Revolution of Procurement System • PPP/PFI/Privatisation • Organisational options to put risk where it can best be managed • Developing project management skills to ensure that government Departments have the capacity to become better purchasers and providers of public services
Lessons fromLeading Countries’ Experience Risk management framework first Involvement and participation of senior management Tailor-made for individual departments Full-scale mobilization Clear responsibility Training courses Learning by doing Technical notes and case studies Continuous improvement