170 likes | 429 Views
Corporate Strategy. Lecture 9. Overview. Horizontal integration The process of acquiring or merging with industry competitors Acquisition and merger Vertical integration
E N D
Corporate Strategy Lecture 9
Overview • Horizontal integration • The process of acquiring or merging with industry competitors • Acquisition and merger • Vertical integration • Expanding operations backward into an industry that produces inputs for the company or forward into an industry that distributes the company’s products • Strategic outsourcing • Letting some value creation activities within a business be performed by an independent entity
Benefits of Horizontal Integration • Reducing costs • HP claims $2.5bn saving per annum in overhead • Increasing value • Product bundling (e.g. Worldcom, MS Office) • Cross selling (common in travel/finance industries) • Managing industry rivalry • Increasing bargaining power • Horizontal integration in health care • first HMOs then hospital groups • Market power (monopoly power) • Why did HP acquire Compaq?
Drawbacks and Limits of Horizontal Integration • Majority of mergers and acquisitions do not create value • only ~30% create value for the acquiring company, although total value is usually positive • Implementing a horizontal integration strategy is not easy • Mergers and acquisitions often fail to produce the anticipated gains (HP/Compaq) • Can bring the company into conflict with antitrust law • e.g. Worldcom with Sprint acquisition
HP stock performance Merger=May 2002.
Vertical Integration: Stages in the Raw Material to Consumer Value Chain
The Raw Material to Consumer Value Chain in the Personal Computer Industry
Increasing Profitability Through Vertical Integration • Builds entry barriers to new competitors by denying them inputs and distributors • eg. Alcoa/Alcan bought all known bauxite sources • Facilitates investment in specialized assets subject to holdup. • Protects product quality through control of input quality and distribution and service of outputs. • McDonalds sometimes takes over a franchise • General Foods bought banana plantations • McDonalds owns farms and trucks in Russia • Improves internal scheduling (e.g., JIT inventory systems) providing fast response to changes in demand
Arguments Against Vertical Integration • Cost disadvantages • Company-owned suppliers that have higher costs than external suppliers • Telecom Australia, DOD • Rapid technological change • Tying a company to an obsolescent technology • Demand unpredictability • Difficulty of achieving close coordination among vertically integrated activities • Bureaucratic costs
Alternatives to Vertical Integration: Cooperative Relationships • Short-term contracts and competitive bidding • Poor treatment of suppliers makes them reluctant to invest in specific assets that may create value for the buyer (e.g. quality, technology). • Strategic alliances and long-term contracting • Building long-term cooperative relationships • Hostage taking & credible commitments • Maintaining market discipline • Periodic renegotiation of the contractual relationship. • Parallel sourcing policy
Benefits of Outsourcing • Reducing costs • The specialist company is less than what it would cost to perform the activity internally • Differentiation • The quality of the activity performed by the specialist is greater than if the activity were performed by the company • Focus • Distractions are removed; the company can focus attention and resources on activities important for value creation and competitive advantage
Identifying and Managing the Risks of Outsourcing • Holdup • The company can become too dependent on the provider of the outsourced activity so that the provider can raise prices • Scheduling of activities • Loss of control can result in distorted signals in the supply chain (e.g. Cisco’s $2bn blunder and eHub) • Loss of information • Contact with the customer may be lost
Exercises • Comparing vertical integration strategies • Seagate vs. Quantum • Closing case: AOL Time Warner