470 likes | 482 Views
Business Entities Chapter 13 pp. 477-534. 2012 National Income Tax Workbook™. Business Entities pp. 477-534. S corporation basis § 1244 losses Abandonments Personal service corporations Business under common control Distributions from business entities.
E N D
Business EntitiesChapter 13 pp. 477-534 2012 National Income Tax Workbook™
Business Entities pp. 477-534 • S corporation basis • § 1244 losses • Abandonments • Personal service corporations • Business under common control • Distributions from business entities
Learning Objectives pp. 477-478 • Determine whether S corporation shareholder obtains debt basis • Calculate § 1244 loss • Identify act of abandonment • Determine if corporation is PSC • Explain common control concerns • Describe taxation of distributions
S Corporation Basis p. 478 • Shareholder loss deductions limited to basis in stock and debt • Maguire allowed shareholders to shift stock basis between corporations • Proposed regulation clarifies requirements for creating debt basis
Maguire case pp. 478-480 • S corporation borrowed from its sister • Shareholders took the debts as distributions and contributed them back to the debtor corporation • Distributions decreased stock basis in lending corporation and increased stock basis in debtor corporation • Court said there was economic outlay
Provisions in Debt Basis Regulation p. 480 • There must be a bona fide debt • Debt must run directly to the shareholder • Basis starts with I.R.C. § 1011 and is adjusted under I.R.C. § 1367 • Guarantee of third-party loan does not create basis, but payment does
Debt Basis pp. 480-481 • No basis for contributing unsecured promissory note • Loan made by disregarded entity runs directly to owner (Example 13.1) • Payment on guaranteed debt creates basis (Example 13.2) • Back-to-back loans can qualify (Examples 13.3 and 13.4)
Prior Litigation pp. 482-486 • Economic outlay (Maloof, Selfe, Perry, Hitchins) in loan guarantees • Form as well as substance (Spencer, Yates) in back-to-back loans • Circular lending arrangements fail when funds end up where they started (Bergman)
Debt or Equity? pp. 486-487 • 13 factors distinguish bona fide debt from contribution to capital • Name of document. Maturity date. Source. Right to enforce. Management right. Status as creditor. Intent. Thin capitalization. Identity of interests. Interest payments. Creditworthiness. Use of funds. Failure to repay timely.
§ 1244 Losses pp. 487-489 • Qualified individual shareholders may claim ordinary loss • Original owner, with acquisition by purchase from corporation (Example 13.5: No fresh infusion of capital) • $50,000 ordinary loss limit is doubled for joint return (Example 13.6)
§ 1244 Stock Defined pp. 489-490 • Stock issued for money or property by small business corporation • Small < $1,000,000 in capital • Assumed liabilities reduce FMV of contributed property (Example 13.7) • Subsequent basis decreases do not reduce § 1244 amount (Example 13.8)
§ 1244 Stock Defined pp. 490-491 • Distributions of property do not reduce § 1244 capital • Retained earnings do not increase §.1244 capital (Example 13.9) • Capital from nonqualified owners is counted (Example 13.10)
Transitional Year p. 491 • Corporation may designate which shares are § 1244 stock • If no designation, allocation is made pro rata (Example 13.11)
Business Qualification pp. 491-492 • Corporation must be operating company (not pocketbook) for 5 years before stock is sold at loss or becomes worthless • No more than 50% of total gross receipts can be investment income • If no receipts, look at principal activity
Other Restrictions p. 492 • Stock received for services ineligible • Built-in loss does not qualify • S corporation income does not qualify (Example 13.12) • § 1244 loss is business loss for NOL • Loss is reported on Form 4797
Abandonment of Property pp. 493-494 • Loss is ordinary loss, rather than capital loss, if no sale or exchange • Two-pronged test (A.J. Industries) • Evidence of intent to abandon • Identifiable event of abandonment • Treas. Reg. § 1.168(i)-8T(d)(2): Intent to discard asset irrevocably
Personal Service Corporations p. 495 • State law professional corporations are often, but not invariably, PSCs • Goal of tax rules: Prevent use of corporation to defer or shelter payments for personal services • Most drastic: I.R.C. § 269A allows the IRS to ignore the corporation
I.R.C. § 269A Definition pp. 495-496 • Substantially all services are performed for one other entity • Principal activity is personal services performed by employee-owners • Employee-owner owns at least 10% of stock, directly or indirectly • Example 13.13 (5% rule)
Court Cases p. 496 • Keller spurred enactment of 269A; doctor established PC to adopt retirement and medical benefit plans, which court said were not illegal • Robucci used LLC structure to reduce self-employment tax; court held that PC had no business purpose
PSC Tax Year pp. 496-497 • Broader definition of PSC (no 10% floor for owner-employee, services can be provided to multiple entities) • Calendar year generally required but fiscal year can be elected (Examples 13.14 and 13.15) • Election results in limit on deductions for payments to owner-employees
Fiscal Year Price pp. 497-498 • Applicable amount equals salaries, rents, etc., paid to employee-owners • Pass 1 of 2 minimum distribution tests • Preceding year test • 3-year average test • If neither test is passed, deductions may be deferred (Example 13.16) • NOL cannot be carried over
Accounting Methods pp. 498-499 • Qualified PSC may use cash method regardless of level of gross receipts • Accrual method PSC must match deductions to income inclusions for all employee-owners and related parties (Example 13.17) • Qualified PSC: 8 types of services, including law, accounting, consulting
PSC Tax Rate pp. 499-500 • Flat 35% on all taxable income • Goal: Encourage PSC to pay out all net income as compensation to owner-employees • PSC in controlled group gets share of each corporate tax bracket (unless election is made), but cannot use it
Businesses Under Common Control pp. 500-502 • Shared ownership (direct or indirect) of disparate businesses can present unexpected tax issues • Example 13.18 points out potential problems • Example 13.19 tests relationships under I.R.C. § 267(b)
Related Party Sale (Timing of Loss Deduction) pp. 502-503 • Related seller cannot recognize loss; related buyer starts with cost basis, but can reduce later gain by first seller’s loss (Example 13.20) • If buyer and seller are in controlled group, seller’s loss deduction is deferred until later sale outside of group (Example 13.21)
Related Party Sale (Character of Gain) pp. 502-503 • Related seller’s gain is ordinary if property is depreciable by related buyer (Example 13.22)
Fringe Benefit Rules pp. 503-504 • Businesses operating through multiple entities are treated as single employer for nondiscrimination rules • Common control embraces all business structures, using capital and profits interests for ownership • Example 13.23: C and S corporations
Affiliated Service Group p. 504 • Organization with principal business of providing services, plus • Organizations that are shareholders or partners in the service provider, plus • Organizations that regularly provide services to the service organization • Example 13.24: PCs and partnership
Controlled Groups pp. 504-505 • Parent-subsidiary or brother-sister relationship between corporations • Component members are treated as single taxpayer for many tax benefits • S corporations are excluded for some purposes • Constructive ownership rules apply
Controlled Groups pp. 507-508 • Parent-subsidiary: One owns at least 80% (by vote or value) of the other (Example 13.25: Indirect ownership) • Brother-sister: Five or fewer individuals own at least 80% of two or more corporations, and minimum common ownership is more than 50% • Example 13.26, Figures 13.10–13.13
Family Attribution p. 508 • Spouses with direct ownership in multiple corporations are treated as one shareholder (Example 13.27)
Spousal Attribution p. 509 • Escape hatch for separate businesses • No spousal attribution for stock if: • No direct ownership • Not an employee or director • < 50% investment income • No required consent for sale • Example 13.28: No common control
Child as Tax Trap p. 509 • Minor child treated as owning shares in both parents’ corporations • Separate corporations become a controlled group • Example 13.29: Baby complicates business tax situation
Applying Tax Benefit Limits pp. 509-510 • Benefits are divided evenly unless group agrees on allocation formula • Equal shares are not beneficial if income is unequal (or one is PSC) • Example 13.30: Empty lower brackets • Schedule O (Form 1120) is filed with each component member’s tax return
Applying Tax Benefit Limits pp. 510-516 • Alternative minimum tax exemption • I.R.C. § 179 deduction • Work opportunity credit • General business credit ($25,000) • Eligibility to use cash accounting • Rev. Proc. 2001-10 • Rev. Proc. 2002-28
Common Paymaster pp. 516-517 • Controlled group of corporations with shared employees can use paymaster to aggregate wages for FICA and FUTA tax purposes • Separate employees are not included • Other business forms are excluded
Consolidated Tax Returns pp. 517-519 • Option for affiliated group (Example 13.40 and Figures 13.18 and 13.19) • Gains and losses of different members can offset each others • Gains on sales within groups are deferred • Only one return to file
Distributions from Business Entities p. 519 • C corporation─worst for desirable tax treatment of distributions, best for simplicity • S corporation occupies middle ground • Partnership─best for desirable tax treatment of distributions, worst for complexity
C Corporations p. 520 • Corporation can never deduct value of distribution • Corporation must recognize gain if FMV of distribution exceeds basis • Corporation cannot recognize loss if FMV is less than basis • Shareholder must include distribution of earnings and profits in income
Examples 13.41, 13.42 pp. 521-523 • Cash, building with liability (gain property), securities (loss property) • Corporation recognizes gain (not loss), and adjusts E&P for gain plus income • Shareholders have taxable dividends, and basis equal to FMV of property • Corporate tax is $176,800 and total tax is $251,800 (Figure 13.25)
S Corporations pp. 523-525 • Corporate gain/loss rules apply • Difference: Income passed through to shareholders when corporation earns it is not taxed again when distributed • Ordering of distributions • AAA 3. PTIA • AE&P 4. OAA
Example 13.44 pp. 525-527 • Same properties distributed and same effect on corporation’s income • S corporation recognizes gain but not loss, and cannot deduct distribution • No corporate-level tax in example • Shareholders’ total tax is $158,000 (assuming highest potential tax), $93,800 less than C corporation total
Partnerships pp. 527-528 • All income flows through to partners • Generally, no gain or loss recognized on distributions (but many exceptions) • Reduction in share of liabilities treated as distribution of cash • Partnership’s basis transfers unless partner’s basis in partnership is lower
Example 13.45 pp. 531-532 • Same distributions as corporations, with no complications (e.g., hot assets) • Partnership recognizes no income on distributions • Partners’ tax on flow-through income is $122,500 (at highest potential rate) • Liability shift creates distributions in addition to property distributions
Example 13.45 pp. 532-533 • Whether partner recognize gain on distribution depends on outside basis • Distributions to 2 partners exceed current-year Schedule K-1 income; if adjusted basis is less than distribution, partner recognizes gain • Partner’s basis in property is not FMV