1 / 57

Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction

Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction. CS/APMA 202 Rosen section 3.4 Aaron Bloomfield. Recursion. Recursion means defining something, such as a function, in terms of itself For example, let f ( x ) = x ! We can define f ( x ) as f ( x ) = x * f( x -1). Recursion example.

abedi
Download Presentation

Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction CS/APMA 202 Rosen section 3.4 Aaron Bloomfield

  2. Recursion • Recursion means defining something, such as a function, in terms of itself • For example, let f(x) = x! • We can define f(x) as f(x) = x * f(x-1)

  3. Recursion example • Rosen, section 3.4, question 1 • Find f(1), f(2), f(3), and f(4), where f(0) = 1 • Let f(n+1) = f(n) + 2 • f(1) = f(0) + 2 = 1 + 2 = 3 • f(2) = f(1) + 2 = 3 + 2 = 5 • f(3) = f(2) + 2 = 5 + 2 = 7 • f(4) = f(3) + 2 = 7 + 2 = 9 • Let f(n+1) = 3f(n) • f(1) = 3 * f(0) = 3*1 = 3 • f(2) = 3 * f(1) = 3*3 = 9 • f(3) = 3 * f(2) = 3*9 = 27 • f(4) = 3 * f(3) = 3*27 = 81

  4. Recursion example • Rosen, section 3.4, question 1 • Find f(1), f(2), f(3), and f(4), where f(0) = 1 • Let f(n+1) = 2f(n) • f(1) = 2f(0) = 21 = 2 • f(2) = 2f(1) = 22 = 4 • f(3) = 2f(2) = 24 = 16 • f(4) = 2f(3) = 216 = 65536 • Let f(n+1) = f(n)2 + f(n) + 1 • f(1) = f(0)2 + f(0) + 1 = 12 + 1 + 1 = 3 • f(2) = f(1)2 + f(0) + 1 = 32 + 3 + 1 = 13 • f(3) = f(2)2 + f(0) + 1 = 132 + 13 + 1 = 183 • f(4) = f(3)2 + f(0) + 1 = 1832 + 183 + 1 = 33673

  5. Fractals • A fractal is a pattern that uses recursion • The pattern itself repeats indefinitely

  6. Fractals

  7. Fibonacci sequence • Definition of the Fibonacci sequence • Non-recursive: • Recursive: F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2) or: F(n+1) = F(n) + F(n-1) • Must always specify base case(s)! • F(1) = 1, F(2) = 1 • Note that some will use F(0) = 1, F(1) = 1

  8. Fibonacci sequence in Java long Fibonacci (int n) { if ( (n == 1) || (n == 2) ) return 1; else return Fibonacci (n-1) + Fibonacci (n-2); } long Fibonacci2 (int n) { return (long) ((Math.pow((1.0+Math.sqrt(5.0)),n)- Math.pow((1.0-Math.sqrt(5.0)),n)) / (Math.sqrt(5) * Math.pow(2,n))); }

  9. Recursion definition • From “The Hacker’s Dictionary”: • recursion n. See recursion. See also tail recursion.

  10. Bad recursive definitions • Consider: • f(0) = 1 • f(n) = 1 + f(n-2) • What is f(1)? • Consider: • f(0) = 1 • f(n) = 1+f(-n) • What is f(1)?

  11. Defining sets via recursion • Same two parts: • Base case (or basis step) • Recursive step • Example: the set of positive integers • Basis step: 1  S • Recursive step: if x  S, then x+1  S

  12. Defining sets via recursion • Rosen, section 3.4, question 24: give recursive definitions for: • The set of odd positive integers • 1  S • If x  S, then x+2  S • The set of positive integer powers of 3 • 3  S • If x  S, then 3*x  S • The set of polynomials with integer coefficients • 0  S • If p(x)  S, then p(x) + cxn  S • c  Z, n  Z and n≥ 0

  13. Defining strings via recursion • Terminology •  is the empty string: “” •  is the set of all letters: { a, b, c, …, z } • The set of letters can change depending on the problem • We can define a set of strings * as follows • Base step:   * • If w  * and x  , then wx  * • Thus, * s the set of all the possible strings that can be generated with the alphabet • Is this countably infinite or uncountably infinite?

  14. Defining strings via recursion • Let  = { 0, 1 } • Thus, * is the set of all binary numbers • Or all binary strings • Or all possible computer files

  15. String length via recursion • How to define string length recursively? • Basis step: l() = 0 • Recursive step: l(wx) = l(w) + 1 if w  * and x   • Example: l(“aaa”) • l(“aaa”) = l(“aa”) + 1 • l(“aa”) = l(“a”) + 1 • l(“a”) = l(“”) + 1 • l(“”) = 0 • Result: 3

  16. Today’s demotivators

  17. Strings via recursion example • Rosen, section 3.4, question 38: Give a recursive definition for the set of string that are palindromes • We will define set P, which is the set of all palindromes • Basis step:  P • Second basis step: x P when x   • Recursive step: xpx P if x   and p  P

  18. Strings and induction example • This requires structural induction, which will be covered later in this slide set

  19. Recursion pros • Easy to program • Easy to understand

  20. Recursion cons • Consider the recursive Fibonacci generator • How many recursive calls does it make? • F(1): 1 • F(2): 1 • F(3): 3 • F(4): 5 • F(5): 9 • F(10): 109 • F(20): 13,529 • F(30): 1,664,079 • F(40): 204,668,309 • F(50): 25,172,538,049 • F(100): 708,449,696,358,523,830,149  7 * 1020 • At 1 billion recursive calls per second (generous), this would take over 22,000 years • But that would also take well over 1012 Gb of memory!

  21. Trees • Rooted trees: • A graph containing nodes and edges • Cannot contain a cycle! Cycle not allowed in a tree

  22. Rooted trees • Recursive definition: • Basis step: A single vertex r is a rooted tree • Recursive step: • Let T1, T2, …, Tn be rooted trees • Form a new tree with a new root r that contains an edge to the root of each of the trees T1, T2, …, Tn

  23. (Extended) Binary trees • Recursive definition • Basis step: The empty set is an extended binary tree • Recursive step: • Let T1, and T2 be extended binary trees • Form a new tree with a new root r • Form a new tree such that T1 is the left subtree, and T2 is the right subtree

  24. Full binary trees • Recursive definition • Basis step: A full binary tree consisting only of the vertex r • Recursive step: • Let T1, and T2 be extended binary trees • Form a new tree with a new root r • Form a new tree T such that T1 is the left subtree, and T2 is the right subtree • This is denoted by T = T1∙T2 • Note the only difference between a regular binary tree and a full one is the basis step

  25. Binary tree height • h(T) denotes the height of tree T • Recursive definition: • Basis step: The height of a tree with only one node r is 0 • Recursive step: • Let T1 and T2 be binary trees • The binary tree T = T1∙T2 has heighth(T) = 1 + max ( h(T1), h(T2) ) • This definition can be generalized to non-binary trees

  26. Binary tree size • n(T) denotes the number of vertices in tree T • Recursive definition: • Basis step: The number of vertices of an empty tree is 0 • Basis step: The number of vertices of a tree with only one node r is 1 • Recursive step: • Let T1 and T2 be binary trees • The number of vertices in binary tree T = T1∙T2 is:n(T) = 1 + n(T1) + n(T2) • This definition can be generalized to non-binary trees

  27. A bit of humor: Computer terminology

  28. Recursion vs. induction • Consider the recursive definition for factorial: • f(0) = 1 • f(n) = n * f(n-1) • Sort of like induction Base case The “step”

  29. Recursion vs. induction • Rosen, section 3.4, example 7 (page 262) • Consider the set of all integers that are multiples of 3 • { 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, … } • { x | x = 3k and k Z+ } • Recursive definition: • Basis step: 3  S • Recursive step: If x S and y S, then x+y S

  30. Recursion vs. induction • Proof via induction: prove that S contains all the integers that are divisible by 3 • Let A be the set of all ints divisible by 3 • Show that S = A • Two parts: • Show that S A • Let P(n) = 3n  S • Base case: P(1) = 3*1  S • By the basis step of the recursive definition • Inductive hypothesis: assume P(k) = 3*k  S is true • Inductive step: show that P(k+1) = 3*(k+1) is true • 3*(k+1) = 3k+3 • 3k  S by the inductive hypothesis • 3  S by the base case • Thus, 3k+3  S by the recursive definition • Show that A S • Done in the text, page 267 (not reproduced here)

  31. What did we just do? • Notice what we did: • Showed the base case • Assumed the inductive hypothesis • For the inductive step, we: • Showed that each of the “parts” were in S • The parts being 3k and 3 • Showed that since both parts were in S, by the recursive definition, the combination of those parts is in S • i.e., 3k+3  S • This is called structural induction

  32. Structural induction • A more convenient form of induction for recursively defined “things“ • Used in conjunction with the recursive definition • Three parts: • Basis step: Show the result holds for the elements in the basis step of the recursive definition • Inductive hypothesis: Assume that the statement is true for some existing elements • Usually, this just means assuming the statement is true • Recursive step: Show that the recursive definition allows the creation of a new element using the existing elements

  33. Tree structural induction example • Rosen, section 3.4, question 43 • Show that n(T) ≥ 2h(T) + 1 • Basis step: Let T be the full binary tree of just one node r • h(T) = 0 • n(T) = 1 • n(T) ≥ 2h(T) + 1 • 1 ≥ 2*0 + 1 • 1 ≥ 1

  34. Tree structural induction example • Show that n(T) ≥ 2h(T) + 1 • Inductive hypothesis: • Let T1 and T2 be full binary trees • Assume that n(T1) ≥ 2h(T1) + 1 for some tree T1 • Assume that n(T2) ≥ 2h(T2) + 1 for some tree T2 • Recursive step: • Let T = T1 ∙ T2 • Here the ∙ operator means creating a new tree with a root note r and subtrees T1 and T2 • New element is T • By the definition of height and size, we know: • n(T) = 1 + n(T1) + n(T2) • h(T) = 1 + max ( h(T1), h(T2) ) • Therefore: • n(T) = 1 + n(T1) + n(T2) • ≥ 1 + 2h(T1) + 1 + 2h(T2) + 1 • ≥ 1 + 2*max ( h(T1), h(T2) ) the sum of two non-neg #’s is at least as large as the larger of the two • = 1 + 2*h(T) • Thus, n(T) ≥ 2h(T) + 1

  35. String structural induction example • Rosen, section 3.4, question 32 • Part (a): Give the definition for ones(s), which counts the number of ones in a bit string s • Let  = { 0, 1 } • Basis step: ones() = 0 • Recursive step: ones(wx) = ones(w) + x • Where x  and w  * • Note that x is a bit: either 0 or 1

  36. String structural induction example • Part (b): Use structural induction to prove that ones(st) = ones(s) + ones(t) • Basis step: t =  • ones (s∙) = ones(s) = ones(s)+0 = ones(s) + ones() • Inductive hypothesis: Assume ones(s∙t) = ones(s) + ones(t) • Recursive step: Want to show that ones(s∙t∙x) = ones(s) + ones(t∙x) • Where s, t  * and x   • New element is ones(s∙t∙x) • ones (s∙t∙x) = ones ((s∙t)∙x)) by associativity of concatenation • = x+ones(s∙t) by recursive definition • = x + ones(s) + ones(t) by inductive hypothesis • = ones(s) + (x + ones(t)) by commutativity and assoc. of + • = ones(s) + ones(t∙x) by recursive definition • Proven!

  37. Quick survey • I feel I understand structural induction… • Very well • With some review, I’ll be good • Not really • Not at all

  38. Human stupidity

  39. Induction methods compared

  40. Induction types compared • Show that F(n) < 2n • Where F(n) is the nth Fibonacci number • Actually F(n) < 20.7*n, but we won’t prove that here • Fibonacci definition: • Basis step: F(1) = 1 and F(2) = 1 • Recursive step: F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2) • Base case (or basis step): Show true for F(1) and F(2) • F(1) = 1 < 21 = 2 • F(2) = 1 < 22 = 4

  41. Via weak mathematical induction • Inductive hypothesis: Assume F(k) < 2k • Inductive step: Prove F(k+1) < 2k+1 • F(k+1) = F(k) + F(k-1) • We know F(k) < 2k by the inductive hypothesis • Each term is less than the next, therefore F(k) > F(k-1) • Thus, F(k-1) < F(k) < 2k • Therefore, F(k+1) = F(k) + F(k-1) < 2k + 2k = 2k+1 • Proven!

  42. Via strong mathematical induction • Inductive hypothesis: Assume F(1) < 21, F(2) < 22, …, F(k-1) < 2k-1, F(k) < 2k • Inductive step: Prove F(k+1) < 2k+1 • F(k+1) = F(k) + F(k-1) • We know F(k) < 2k by the inductive hypothesis • We know F(k-1) < 2k-1 by the inductive hypothesis • Therefore, F(k) + F(k-1) < 2k + 2k-1 < 2k+1 • Proven!

  43. Via structural induction • Inductive hypothesis: Assume F(n) < 2n • Recursive step: • Show true for “new element”: F(n+1) • We know F(n) < 2n by the inductive hypothesis • Each term is less than the next, therefore F(n) > F(n-1) • Thus, F(n-1) < F(n) < 2n • Therefore, F(n) + F(n-1) < 2n + 2n = 2n+1 • Proven!

  44. Another way via structural induction • Inductive hypothesis: Assume F(n) < 2n and F(n-1) < 2n-1 • The difference here is we are using two “old” elements versus one, as in the last slide • Recursive step: • Show true for “new element”: F(n+1) • F(n+1) = F(n) + F(n-1) • We know F(n) < 2n by the inductive hypothesis • We know F(n-1) < 2n-1 by the inductive hypothesis • Therefore, F(n) + F(n-1) < 2k + 2k-1 < 2k+1 • Proven!

  45. But wait! • In this example, the structural induction proof was essentially the same as the weak or strong mathematical induction proof • It’s hard to find an example that works well for all of the induction types • Structural induction will work on some recursive problems which weak or strong mathematical induction will not • Trees, strings, etc.

  46. A bit of humor…

  47. Section 3.4, question 8 • Give the recursive definition of the following sequences • Note that many answers are possible! • an = 4n – 2 • Terms: 2, 6, 10, 14, 16, etc. • a1 = 2 • an = an-1 + 4 • an = 1 + (-1)n • Terms: 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, etc. • a1 = 0, a2 = 2 • an = an-2 • an = n(n+1) • Terms: 2, 6, 12, 20, 30, 42, etc. • a1 = 2 • an = an-1 + 2*n • an = n2 • Terms: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, etc. • a1 = 1 • an = an-1 + 2n - 1

  48. Section 3.4, question 12 • Show that f12 + f22 + f32 + … + fn2 = fnfn+1 • Base case: n = 1 • f12 = f1f2 • 12 = 1*1 • Inductive hypothesis: Assume • f12 + f22 + f32 + … + fk2 = fkfk+1 • Inductive step: Prove • f12 + f22 + f32 + … + fk2 + fk+12 = fk+1fk+2

  49. Section 3.4, question 12 • Inductive hypothesis: Assume • f12 + f22 + f32 + … + fk2 = fkfk+1 • Inductive step: Prove • f12 + f22 + f32 + … + fk2 + fk+12 = fk+1fk+2 • fkfk+1 + fk+12 = fk+1fk+2 • fkfk+1 + fk+12 = fk+1 (fk + fk+1) • fkfk+1 + fk+12 = fkfk+1 + fk+12

  50. Section 3.4, question 13 • Show that f1 + f2 + f3 + … + f2n-1 = f2n • Base case: n = 1 • f1 = f2*1 • 1 = 1 • Inductive hypothesis: Assume • f1 + f2 + f3 + … + f2k-1 = f2k • Inductive step: Prove • f1 + f2 + f3 + … + f2k-1 + f2(k+1)-1 = f2(k+1) • f1 + f2 + f3 + … + f2k-1 + f2k+1 = f2k+2

More Related