150 likes | 278 Views
PROJECT 11462 THERMOELECTRICS AND FAN SYSTEM FOR COOK STOVE. PROJECT UPDATE – DEC. 10, 2010. TEAM ROLES. JARED RUGG – M.E. - PROJECT MANAGER BRAD SAWYER – M.E. - LEAD ENGINEER JEFF BIRD – M.E. TOM GOREVSKI – E.E. FAHAD MASOOD – E.E. Team Values and Norms.
E N D
PROJECT 11462THERMOELECTRICS AND FAN SYSTEM FOR COOK STOVE PROJECT UPDATE – DEC. 10, 2010
TEAM ROLES • JARED RUGG – M.E. -PROJECT MANAGER • BRAD SAWYER – M.E. - LEAD ENGINEER • JEFF BIRD – M.E. • TOM GOREVSKI – E.E. • FAHAD MASOOD – E.E.
Team Values and Norms • The following are agreed upon values for our team • Punctuality • Quality • Accuracy • Ethical conduct • Commitment
Punctuality • Each team member will be prompt and arrive at the team meetings on time. If an unexpected conflict comes up, the absent team member will notify at least one team-mate prior to the expected absence. An absent team-member should confirm that a team-mate has received their message (in person, voice mail, email, etc).
Quality • Each team member will complete their tasks thoroughly and completely, so that the work does not have to be re-done by a peer on the team. If a member does not know how to complete a task, feels overwhelmed, or needs assistance then the member notifies peers, and seeks assistance either from a peer, the faculty guide, a faculty consultant, or another person.
Accuracy • Each team member completes their work accurately and in a way that can be easily checked for accuracy by peers and the faculty guide. All work is fully documented and easy to follow.
Ethical Conduct • Each team member gives credit where credit is due. All work completed includes citations to appropriate literature, or sources of assistance. If a team member has gotten assistance from a publication or individual, then that assistance or guidance is fully documented in the reports prepared. Each team member is honest and trustworthy in their dealings with their peers.
Commitment • Each team member will contribute an equal share to the success of the project and is fully committed to the successful completion of the project.
Standards for Peer Evaluation • Unsatisfactory • Consistently absent, detracts from performance of team, plagiarizes work, etc. • Needs Improvement • Consistently late, not a detriment to the team nor an asset. • Meets Expectations • Prompt, prepared, responsible • Exceeds Expectations • Quality of work is exceptional, doing more than their fair share of work.
Consequences of Unsatisfactory Behavior • In the event that a member consistently exhibits unsatisfactory behavior the following steps will be taken. • First the team leader will notify the member that their effort is unacceptable • If the member still displays the same behavior then the faculty advisor will be made aware of the member’s lack of commitment • If member’s behavior still does not improve, further steps will be taken at mentor’s discretion
Source • Team values and norms were taken from DPM values and norms-https://edge.rit.edu/content/R11020/public/Team%20Values%20and%20Norms
Plans for Week Three • Further refine customer needs and engineering specs • Core needs of device • Establish functions • Device operations such as providing air flow • Meet with 11461 stove team • Initial meeting to acquire a sense of their design goals • Thermal electric lecture • Better understanding of thermal electric operation • Set up meeting with Sarah Brownell • Gain a better comprehension of cultural aspect • Brainstorm and research solutions • Ways to meet function requirements • Select system solutions • Narrow solutions down to most feasible • Begin risk assessment • Possible issues down the road with specified solutions • EDGE tutorial