250 likes | 263 Views
This seminar discusses the challenges and strategies in reserving for auto physical damage, focusing on benchmarking, adding value, and estimating salvage and subrogation recoverables. Presented by Bill Carpenter in September 11, 2006.
E N D
Personal Auto Special Reserving IssuesCasualty Loss Reserve SeminarSeptember 11, 2006By Bill Carpenter
Agenda • Why discuss Auto Physical Damage … • Benchmarking / Adding Value • Estimating Salvage / Subrogation Recoverables
Why Auto Physical Damage ? What is this negative development?
Even With Paid Losses ? Yes … after 24 months. Usually after 15 months if it were shown here
Removing Salvage / Subrogation Back to a “normal” pattern
Definitions • Salvage: Damaged property an insurer takes over to reduce its loss after paying a claim. • Subrogation: The legal process by which an insurance company, after paying a loss, seeks to recover the amount of the loss from another party who is legally liable for it.
Characteristics • Total amount: $8.14 billion • Most of the recoveries are from subrogation • 16.8% of paid losses • Develops slower than losses All numbers are 2005 industry calendar year amounts for auto physical damage only
Agenda • Why discuss Auto Physical Damage … • Benchmarking / Adding Value
Adding Value • Job 1 is “getting it right” for the reserving actuary • But … also look for the opportunity to add value in other ways
Paradox • When you are focused on the balance sheet, the danger is being viewed primarily as an expense (i.e., a drag on the income statement) • When you can contribute to reducing costs on the income statement, you will be valued as an asset
A Chance to Play Offense Instead of reacting to losses on defense, subrogation provides the opportunity for a company to play offense
Why the Differences? • Some state differences • Mainly company practices • Front line adjusters • Trained only to identify subrogation potential • Measured on numbers of referrals with potential • Centralized subrogation unit • Work adjuster referrals • Measured on recoveries per referral and/or recoveries per referred loss dollars • Smaller companies without the scale to centralize can outsource • Companies recognize the customer service value in recovering customer deductibles
Benchmarking Wrap-up • $2.5 billion potential industry opportunity • Extrapolating from top 50 company results • Represents 6.5% of auto physical damage net paid losses • Even larger opportunity for companies performing at below average levels • Higher levels contribute to customer satisfaction and retention when more deductibles are recovered • So … next time you review salvage / subrogation recoverables, compare yourself to peer companies and report the results
Agenda • Why discuss Auto Physical Damage … • Benchmarking / Adding Value • Estimating Salvage / Subrogation Recoverables
Estimating Recoverables • Best methods – calculate directly from salvage / subrogation data • Other methods • Allocation methods
Recoverables by Coverage • Split of collision / comprehensive salvage / subrogation amounts may be desired for internal purposes • Usually best to estimate directly • Allocation approach is also possible • Allocate total estimated recoverable in proportion to the amount received to date (by accident year)
Other Approaches • Bornheutter – Ferguson approach using paid ultimate paid losses as the denominator or exposure base • Calculate as the difference between gross and net loss projections (gross and net of salvage / subrogation) • Received to paid approach is problematic
Incremental Received to Paid Ratios This example is typical with incremental received to paid ratios increasing consistently for several annual periods