1 / 25

Agenda

This seminar discusses the challenges and strategies in reserving for auto physical damage, focusing on benchmarking, adding value, and estimating salvage and subrogation recoverables. Presented by Bill Carpenter in September 11, 2006.

abrooke
Download Presentation

Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personal Auto Special Reserving IssuesCasualty Loss Reserve SeminarSeptember 11, 2006By Bill Carpenter

  2. Agenda • Why discuss Auto Physical Damage … • Benchmarking / Adding Value • Estimating Salvage / Subrogation Recoverables

  3. Why Auto Physical Damage ? What is this negative development?

  4. Even With Paid Losses ? Yes … after 24 months. Usually after 15 months if it were shown here

  5. Removing Salvage / Subrogation Back to a “normal” pattern

  6. Definitions • Salvage: Damaged property an insurer takes over to reduce its loss after paying a claim. • Subrogation: The legal process by which an insurance company, after paying a loss, seeks to recover the amount of the loss from another party who is legally liable for it.

  7. Characteristics • Total amount: $8.14 billion • Most of the recoveries are from subrogation • 16.8% of paid losses • Develops slower than losses All numbers are 2005 industry calendar year amounts for auto physical damage only

  8. Agenda • Why discuss Auto Physical Damage … • Benchmarking / Adding Value

  9. Adding Value • Job 1 is “getting it right” for the reserving actuary • But … also look for the opportunity to add value in other ways

  10. Paradox • When you are focused on the balance sheet, the danger is being viewed primarily as an expense (i.e., a drag on the income statement) • When you can contribute to reducing costs on the income statement, you will be valued as an asset

  11. A Chance to Play Offense Instead of reacting to losses on defense, subrogation provides the opportunity for a company to play offense

  12. Benchmarking Your Team

  13. Why the Differences? • Some state differences • Mainly company practices • Front line adjusters • Trained only to identify subrogation potential • Measured on numbers of referrals with potential • Centralized subrogation unit • Work adjuster referrals • Measured on recoveries per referral and/or recoveries per referred loss dollars • Smaller companies without the scale to centralize can outsource • Companies recognize the customer service value in recovering customer deductibles

  14. The Opportunity for Improvement

  15. Benchmarking Wrap-up • $2.5 billion potential industry opportunity • Extrapolating from top 50 company results • Represents 6.5% of auto physical damage net paid losses • Even larger opportunity for companies performing at below average levels • Higher levels contribute to customer satisfaction and retention when more deductibles are recovered • So … next time you review salvage / subrogation recoverables, compare yourself to peer companies and report the results

  16. Agenda • Why discuss Auto Physical Damage … • Benchmarking / Adding Value • Estimating Salvage / Subrogation Recoverables

  17. Estimating Recoverables • Best methods – calculate directly from salvage / subrogation data • Other methods • Allocation methods

  18. Salvage Received Triangle

  19. Calculate Age to Age Factors

  20. Calculate Ultimate Salvage

  21. Recoverables by Coverage • Split of collision / comprehensive salvage / subrogation amounts may be desired for internal purposes • Usually best to estimate directly • Allocation approach is also possible • Allocate total estimated recoverable in proportion to the amount received to date (by accident year)

  22. Recoverables by Coverage – Allocation Method

  23. Other Approaches • Bornheutter – Ferguson approach using paid ultimate paid losses as the denominator or exposure base • Calculate as the difference between gross and net loss projections (gross and net of salvage / subrogation) • Received to paid approach is problematic

  24. Incremental Received to Paid Ratios This example is typical with incremental received to paid ratios increasing consistently for several annual periods

  25. Questions / Comments

More Related