1 / 7

Goals and Benefits of Multihoming Generic Issues

Thierry Ernst, Nicolas Montavont, Ryuji Wakikawa, Eun-Kyoung Paik, Chan-Wah Ng, Koojana Kuladinithi, Thomas Noel. Goals and Benefits of Multihoming Generic Issues. IETF 59 Seoul - Korea March 1, 2004. Purpose of this draft. Kind of update of

abrownlee
Download Presentation

Goals and Benefits of Multihoming Generic Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Thierry Ernst, Nicolas Montavont, Ryuji Wakikawa, Eun-Kyoung Paik, Chan-Wah Ng, Koojana Kuladinithi,Thomas Noel Goals and Benefits of Multihoming Generic Issues IETF 59 Seoul - Korea March 1, 2004

  2. Purpose of this draft • Kind of update of draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement-00 • Focus on • scenarios of multihoming • Goals/Benefits of multihoming • Generic issues • Not linked to any solution/working group • Not linked to any type of node (apply for fixed/mobile hosts and routers)

  3. Contents of the I-D • Definition of multihoming • Goals/benefits proposition • Real-life scenarios • Rough analysis of the benefits

  4. Goals and benefits proposition • Ubiquitous Access: anywhere and anytime • Redundancy/Fault-Recovery • Load Sharing: share load in the network • Load Balancing: share load between interfaces • Bi-casting: n-cast the traffic to multiple addresses of the node • Preference Settings: allow the user/application/ISP to set preferences on interfaces/addresses

  5. Real-life scenario • Exemple 4: Ubiquitous Access, Load Balancing, Preference Setting • Downloads medical records over satellite link (Faster bit rate, Longer traversal delay) • VC with the specialist over wide area cellular link (best for realtime at the moment)

  6. Rough Analysis • Propose to split multihoming cases: • One interface (multiple prefixes) • No ubiquitous access • No load balancing • Recovery on one prefix failure only • Several interfaces  Give the hints to evaluate a multihoming solution

  7. Future… • Is there any interest in this work ? • No WG designed to take this work… • Is it material for a new BOF ?

More Related