1 / 14

LESSONS LEARNED 2005

LESSONS LEARNED 2005. NATIONAL INCIDENT COMMANDER/AREA COMMANDER AFTER ACTION REVIEWS. AFTER ACTION REVIEWS & CURRENT STATUS. IC/AC GROUP PRODUCED 2 AAR’S IN DECEMBER, 2005: One focusing on the National Response Plan One focusing on issues within the control of the Wildland Fire Community

acrenshaw
Download Presentation

LESSONS LEARNED 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LESSONS LEARNED 2005 NATIONAL INCIDENT COMMANDER/AREA COMMANDER AFTER ACTION REVIEWS

  2. AFTER ACTION REVIEWS & CURRENT STATUS • IC/AC GROUP PRODUCED 2 AAR’S IN DECEMBER, 2005: • One focusing on the National Response Plan • One focusing on issues within the control of the Wildland Fire Community • The NRP AAR sent to the Sec. of DHS and the Acting Director of FEMA • The Internal AAR sent to National/Regional Fire Directors, NWCG, NMAC, etc.

  3. NRP AAR – KEY POINTS & ONGOING REVISIONS • THE NRP LACKS SUBSTANCE • Roles and Responsibilities need to be expanded – especially as they relate to the ESF-4 • The NRP relies on local response – fails to recognize or plan for the cascading effect of the collapse of local/state government • The NRP fails to provide a clear, coordinated organization for emergency response needs • NRP processes and systems lacking to support a disaster and reflect the sense of urgency demanded by those affected

  4. NRP AAR – KEY POINTS & ONGOING REVISIONS • NRP LACKS SUBSTANCE – STATUS REPORT • ESF-4 issue being addressed – includes: • “Typing” of ESF-4 skills • Utilizing USFA to represent “structural ESF-4” • Qualifications • Position Task Book • Other ESF’s?

  5. NRP AAR – KEY POINTS & ONGOING REVISIONS • The failure to plan for the collapse of local/state government • Also recognized by the White House report • Being discussed – resolution: unknown • The need to provide a clear, coordinated organization for emergency response • IC/AC Group provided a recommended “field organization to the Sec. of DHS • IC/AC Group has formally begun working with HSOC to assist in the resolution of this issue • PFO – likely to utilize IMT to run JFO

  6. NRP AAR – KEY POINTS & ONGOING REVISIONS • Processes and systems not in place • Single point ordering and tracking system under development • ROSS will be utilized to track and status resources • THE ROLE AND CAPABILITIES OF IMT’S IS POORLY UNDERSTOOD • The leadership and management model of IMT’s is being recognized: PFO’s, Secretary, Director, HSOC • Expect more, not less reliance (we can’t do this without you – USCG, FEMA – USFA) • Pre-scripted mission assignments being developed • Agreements with States

  7. NRP AAR – KEY POINTS & ONGOING REVISION • NRP FISCAL-RELATED POLICIES AS THEY RELATE TO IMT’S NEED CLARIFICATION • Need a clear definition of fiscal authority and accountability for IMTs • Resolution: unknown • THE NEED TO ENGAGE THE WILDLAND FIRE GROUP IN THE REVISION OF THE NRP • DOA/DOI have requested involvement in re-write or review • Development of the “All Hazards” Doctrine • Dale Dague/Steve Gage – current FS WO reps • Chair IC/AC group partner up with CG/HSOC

  8. INTERNAL AAR –KEY POINTS – CURRENT STATUS • ROLE OF THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA • Causes confusion and duplication – a parallel organization for emergency response • Clarification is being developed – SE GA • THE NEED FOR AN ALL-HAZARD TOOL KIT • Databases, standard plans for military bases, cache vans specific to all hazard, agreements, etc. • Under development – also recognized is SA AAR

  9. INTERNAL AAR – KEY POINTS – CURRENT STATUS • OBLIGATION OF AGENCY $ WITHOUT CLEAR AUTHORITY • An issue for both federal and non-Federal IC’s • Can be addressed with a DOA for Federal IC’s • OGC asked to address the issue for non-Feds • SPAN OF CONTROL FOR ACT’S AND BT’S • There is a group addressing the issue associated with buying teams • Capacity for AC more problematic - capacity

  10. INTERNAL AAR – KEY POINTS - CURRENT STATUS • IMT ALLOWABLE WEIGHT FOR NICC CHARTERED AIRCRAFT • Revision has been developed – expect letter to that effect in the near future • WILDLAND FIRE AGENCIES ORGANIZATION & THE ABILITY TO MEET NRP • SORO has developed a plan to address the issue in PNW GA • Id’ed as an issue in the SE – under development • Nationally – not currently being addressed

  11. INTERNAL AAR – KEY POINTS – CURRENT STATUS • THE NEED FOR A COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS FOR ALL HAZARD ASSIGNMENTS • Under development • AVAIALBILITY & AUTHORITY OF AGENCY LEO’S • Discussions have occurred between USFS/DOI law enforcement on this issue • Commitment to resolve

  12. INTERNAL AAR – KEY POINTS – CURRENT STATUS • THE CONVOLUTED AND COMPLEX ORDERING SYSTEM DOES NOT INSTILL A SENSE OF URGENCY • Multiple ordering systems all based on a tiered approach is cumbersome, lacks a tracking mechanism, and changes from state to state • THE WILDLAND FIRE COMMUNITY NEEDS TO: • Develop an ordering handbook • Instill a sense of urgency for filling orders • Tie GSA to our Buying Teams • Work with DHS to develop a single ordering system

  13. AARs – THE CHALLENGE WHAT CAN YOU DO TO IMPROVE RESPONSE IN THE ALL HAZARD ARENA?

  14. QUESTIONS?

More Related