770 likes | 1.53k Views
Configuration Interaction in Quantum Chemistry. Jun-ya HASEGAWA Fukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry Kyoto University. Prof. M. Kotani (1906-1993). Contents. Molecular Orbital (MO) Theory Electron Correlations Configuration Interaction (CI) & Coupled-Cluster (CC) methods
E N D
Configuration Interaction in Quantum Chemistry Jun-ya HASEGAWA Fukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry Kyoto University
Contents Molecular Orbital (MO) Theory Electron Correlations Configuration Interaction(CI) & Coupled-Cluster (CC) methods Multi-Configuration Self-Consistent Field (MCSCF) method Theory for Excited States Applications to photo-functional proteins
Electronic Schrödinger equation • Electronic Schrödinger eq. w/ Born-Oppenheimer approx. • Electronic Hamiltonian operator (non-relativistic) • Potential energy • Wave function • The most important issue in electronic structure theory
Many-electronwave function • Orbital approximation: product of one-electron orbitals • The Pauli anti-symmetry principle • Slater determinant • Anti-symmetrized orbital products • One-electron orbitals are the basic variables in MO theory
One-electron orbitals Linear combination of atom-centered Gaussian functions. Primitive Gaussian function
Variational determination of the MO coefficients Energy functional Lagrange multiplier method
Hartree-Fock equation →Eigenvalue equation Eigenvalue: Multiplier (orbital energy) Eigenvector: MO coefficients • Variation of MO coefficients • Hartree-Fock equation • A unitary transformation that diagonalizes the multiplier matrix • Canonical Hartree-Fock equation
Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) equation • Spin in MO theory: (a)spin orbital formulation → spatial orbital rep. ) (b) Restricted (c) Unrestricted • Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) equation for a closed shell (CS) system • RHF wf is an eigenfunction of spin operators: a proper relation
Electron correlations − Introduction to Configuration Interaction −
Definition of “electron correlations”in Quantum Chemistry Restricted HF Static correlation is dominant. Numerically Exact Dynamical correlation is dominant. Fig. Potetntial energy curves of H2 molecule. 6-31G** basis set. [Szabo, Ostlund, “Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory”, Dover] • Electron correlations defined as a difference from Full-CI energy • Two classes of electron correlations Dynamical correlations • Lack of Coulomb hole Static (non-dynamical) correlations • Bond dissociation, Excited states • Near degeneracy No explicit separation between dynamical and static correlations.
Dynamical correlations: lack of Coulomb hole • Slater det. : Products of one-electron function →Independent particle model • Possibility of finding two electrons at : H2–like molecule case
- Introducing dynamical correlations via configuration interaction • Interacting a doubly excited configuration • Chemical intuition: Changing the orbital picture →
- Left-right correlation • in olefin compounds - x = + x = No correlations included = Configuration interaction
- Angular correlation • One-step higher angular momentum - x = + x = = Configuration interaction No correlations included
Static correlations: improper electronic structure Ionic configuration: 2 e on A Covalent config.: 2 e at each A and B Ionic configuration: 2 e on B Covalent config.: 2 e at each A and B • 2-electron system in a dissociating homonuclear diatomic molecule • Changing orbital picture into a local basis: • Each configuration has a fixed weight of 25 %. • No independent variable that determines the weight for each configuration when the bond-length stretches.
Introducing static correlations via configuration interaction A A A A B B B B • Interacting a doubly excited configuration • Some particular change the weights of covalent and ionic configurations.
Configuration Interaction (CI) and Coupled-Cluster (CC) wave functions
Some notations • Notations • Occupied orbital indices: i, j, k, …. • Unoccupied orbital indices: a, b, c, ….. • Creation operator: Annihilation operator: • Spin-averaged excitation operator • Spin-adapted operator (singlet) • Reference configuration: Hartree-Fock determinant • Excited configuration • Correct spin multiplicity (Eigenfunction of operators)
Configuration Interaction (CI) wave function: a general form • CI expansion: Linear combination of excited configurations • Full-CI gives exact solutions within the basis sets used. ∙∙∙∙ CI Singles (CIS) CI Singles and Doubles (CISD) CI Singles, Doubles, and Triples (CISDT) Full configuration interaction (Full CI)
Variational determination of the wave function coefficients • CI energy functional • Lagrange multiplier method • Constraint: Normalization condition • Variation of Lagrangian • Eigenvalue equation
H2O H2O H2O H2O Percentage (%) R ~ large H2O H2O H2O H2O Number of water molecules Fig. Correlation energy per water molecule as a percentage of the Full-CI correlation energy (%) . The cc-pVDZ basis sets were used. Availability of CI method • A straightforward approach to the correlation problem starting from MO theory • Not only for the ground state but for the excited states • Accuracy is systematically improved by increasing the excitation order up to Full-CI (exact solution) • Energy is not size-extensive except for CIS and Full-CI • Difficulty in applying large systems • Full-CI: number of configurations rapidly increases with the size of the system. • kα+kβ electrons in nα+nβ orbitals → • Porphyrin: nα=nβ =384 , kα=kβ =152 → ~10221 determinants Full-CI CISD
Coupled-Cluster (CC) wave function • CI wf: a linear expansion • CC wf: an exponential expansion CC Singles (CCS) CI Singles and Doubles (CCSD) ∙∙∙∙ CC Singles, Doubles, and Triples (CCSDT) Single excitations Double excitations Triple excitations Non-linear terms Linear terms =CI
No interaction Far away Why exponential? • Size-extensive • Non interacting two molecules A and B • Super-molecular calculation ↔ CI case • A part of higher-order excitations described effectively by products of lower-order excitations. • Dynamical correlations is two body and short range.
Solving CC equations • Schrödinger eq. with the CC w.f. • CC energy: Project on HF determinant • Coefficients: Project on excited configurations (CCSD case) • Non-linear equations. • Number of variable is the same as CI method. • Number of operation count in CCSD is O(N6), similar to CI method.
SDTQ56 SDTQ SDT SDTQ5 SD Hierarchy in CI and CC methods and numerical performance Excitation order in wf. • Rapid convergence in the CC energy to Full-CI energy when the excitation order increases. • Higher-order effect was included via the non-linear terms. • In a non-equilibrium structure, the convergence becomes worse than that in the equilibrium structure. • Conventional CC method is for molecules in equilibrium structure. ~kcal/mol “Chemical accuracy” CI法 Error from Full-CI(hartree) CC法 Fig. Error from Full-CI energy. H2O molecule with cc-pVDZ basis sets.[1] Table. Error from Full-CI energy. H2O at equilibrium structure (Rref) and OH bonds elongated twice (2Rref)). cc-pVDZ sets were used.[1] [1]“Molecular Electronic Structure Theory”, Helgaker, Jorgensen, Olsen, Wiley, 2000.
cc-pVDZ cc-pVTZ cc-pVQZ Statistics: Bond length HF • Comparison with the experimental data (normal distribution [1]) • H2, HF, H2O, HOF, H2O2, HNC, NH3, … (30 molecules) • “CCSD(T)” : Perturbative Triple correction to CCSD energy MP2 CCSD CCSD(T) CISD [1]“Molecular Electronic Structure Theory”, Helgaker, Jorgensen, Olsen, Wiley, 2000. Error/pm=0.01Å Error/pm=0.01Å Error/pm=0.01Å
Statistics: Atomization energy • Normal distribution • F2, H2, HF, H2O, HOF, H2O2, HNC, NH3, etc (total 20 molecules) Error from experimental value in kJ/mol (200 kJ/mol=48.0 kcal/mol) [1]“Molecular Electronic Structure Theory”, Helgaker, Jorgensen, Olsen, Wiley, 2000.
Statistics: reaction enthalpy • Normal distribution • CO+H2→CH2O HNC→HCN H2O+F2→HOF+HF N2+3H2→2NH3 etc. (20reactions) • Increasing accuracy in both theory and basis functions, calculated data approach to the experimental values. Error from experimental data in kJ/mol (80 kJ/mol=19.0 kcal/mol) [1]“Molecular Electronic Structure Theory”, Helgaker, Jorgensen, Olsen, Wiley, 2000.
Beyond single-configuration description B A + B A A B • Single-configuration description • Applicable to molecules in the ground state at near equilibrium structure Hartree-Fock method • Multi-configuration description • Bond-dissociation, excited state, …. • Quasi-degeneracy → Linear combination of configurations to describe STATIC correlations • Multi-Configuration Self-Configuration Field (MCSCF) w.f. • Complete Active Space SCF (CASSCF) method CI part = Full-CI: all possible electronic configurations are involved.
MCSCF method: a second-order optimizaton • Trial MCSCF wave function is parameterized by • Orbital rotation: unitary transformation • CI correction vector • MCSCF energy expanded up to second-order
MCSCF applications to potential energy surfaces Soboloewski, A. L. and Domcke, W. “Efficient Excited-State Deactivation in Organic Chromophores and Biologically Relevant Molecules: Role of Electron and Proton Transfer Processes”, In “Conical Intersections”, pp. 51-82, Eds. Domcke, Yarkony, Koppel, Singapore, World Scientific, 2011. • CI guarantees qualitative description whole potential surfaces • From equilibrium structure to bond-dissociation limit • From ground state to excited states
Dynamical correlations on top of MCSCF w.f. • MCSCF handles only static correlations. • CAS-CI active space is at most 14 elec. in 14 orb. → For main configurations. → Lack of dynamical correlations. • CASPT2 (2nd-order Perturbation Theory for CASSCF) • Coefficients are determined by the 1st order eq. • Energy is corrected at the 2nd order eq. ← MP2 for MCSCF • MRCC (Multi-Reference Coupled-Cluster) • One of the most accurate treatment for the electron correlations.
Excited states: definition Hamiltonian orthogonality Orthogonality • Excited states as Eigenstates • Mathematical conditions for excited states • Orthogonality • Hamiltonian orthogonality • CI is a method for excited states • CI eigenequation • Hamiltonian matrix is diagonalized. • Eigenvector is orthogonal each other
Excited states for the Hartree-Fock (HF) ground state • From the HF stationary condition to Brillouin theorem • Parameterized Hartree-Fock state as a trial state • Unitary transformation for the orbital rotation • HF energy expanded up to the second order • Stationary condition
Excited states for the Hartree-Fock (HF) ground state • CI Singles is an excited-state w. f. for HF ground state • Brillouin theorem: Single excitation is Hamiltonian orthogonal to HF state • CIS wave function • Hamiltonian orthogonality & orthogonality → CIS satisfies the correct relationship with the HF ground state • CI Singles and Doubles (CISD) does not provide a proper excited-state for HF ground state
Excitation operators and coefficients: Excited states for Coupled-Cluster (CC) ground state [1] • CC wave function (or symmetry-adapted cluster (SAC) w. f.) • CC w.f. into Schrödinger eq. • Differentiate the CC Schrödinger eq. • Generalized Brillouin theorem (GBT) → Structure of excited-state w. f. [1]H. Nakatsuji, Chem. Phys. Lett., 59(2), 362-364 (1978); 67(2,3), 329-333 (1979); 334-342 (1979).
Symmetry-adapted cluster-Configuration Interaction (SAC-CI)[1] • A basis function for excited states • Orthogonality • Hamiltonian orthogonality → • SAC-CI wave function GBT from CC equation [1]H. Nakatsuji, Chem. Phys. Lett., 59(2), 362-364 (1978); 67(2,3), 329-333 (1979); 334-342 (1979).
SAC-CI(SD-R)compared with Full-CI Accurate solution at Single and Double approximation→Applicable to molecules
Hierarchical view of CI-related methods EQ: Equilibrium GS: Ground states EX: Excited states IP: Independent Particle model Corr: Correlated model Dynamical correlations Corr CC level Full-CI MRCC Perturbation 2nd order CASPT2 Hartree-Fock MP2 CC SAC-CI CIS(D), CC2 CIS Uncorrelated IP Applicability to structures GS Non-EQ EQ MCSCF Static correlations EX Excited states
Practical aspect in CI-related methods Fragment based approximated methods (divide & conquer, FMO, etc.) were excluded. Nact: Number of active orbitals , MxEX: The maximum order of excitation Nact CCSD, SAC-CISD(MxEX in linear terms) ~1000 Maximum number of active orbitals CCSDTQ (MxEX in linear terms) ~100 RASSCF RASPT2[1] Challenge 32 Challenge: Speed up 15 CASSCF, CASPT2[1] MxEX 10 16 2 4 Maximum number of excitations [1] P.-Å. Malmqvist, K. Pierloot, A. R. M. Shahi, C. J. Cramer, and L. Gagliardi, JCP 128, 204109 (2008).
Some important conditions for an electronic wave function E Coordinates • The Pauli anti-symmetry principle • Size-extensivity • Cusp conditions • Spin-symmetry adapted (for the non-relativistic Hamiltonian op.)