350 likes | 364 Views
This outline provides a general overview of the Erasmus+ Key Action 2 Capacity Building in Higher Education program, detailing the project consortium, financing rules, application process, and selection procedure. It covers the regions eligible for participation, principles, objectives, types of projects, eligible participants, consortia composition, priorities, types of activities, budget categories, partnership agreement, and application process. This comprehensive guide aims to assist potential applicants in understanding the requirements and procedures for participating in this capacity-building initiative.
E N D
Erasmus +Key Action 2Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education Call for proposals 2017
OUTLINE Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education General overview Project consortium and Financing rules Application process and Selection procedure CBHE – Information sources
PART I General Overview of the Action
Erasmus+ KA3 Policy BHE KA2 Cooperation KA1 Mobility
Capacity-Building Projects are: • transnational cooperation projects • between higher education institutions (HEIs) • from Programme and (eligible) Partner Countries, • aiming at modernizing the Partner Countries' higher education institutions and systems. BHE
CBHE Programme and Partner Countries • Region 1: Western Balkans • Region 2: EasternPartnership • Region 3: South-Mediterranean • Region 4: RussianFederation • Region 6: Asia • Region 7: Central Asia • Region 8: Latin America • Region 9: Iran, Iraq, Yemen • Region 10: South Africa • Region 11: African, Caribean and Pacific
CBHE Objectives • CBHE projects aim at achieving a long lasting impact on the Partner Countries HE institutions and systems through: • Improving the modernisation and quality of HE and its relevance for the labour market and society; • Improving the competences and skills in HEIs via innovative education programmes • Enhancing the management, governance and innovation capacities, as well as the internationalisation of HEIs • Increasing capacities of National Authorities to modernise their higher education systems • Fostering regional integration+ cooperation between different regions of the world
Joint Projects – Examples of Activities • Development, testing and adapting of curricula, learning and teaching materials, tools and methods for professional development of academic and administrative staff, new governance and management systems and structures • Organisation of staff training (academic and non academic) • Strenghtening of the internationalisation of HEI and the capacity to networkeffectively in research, scientific and technologicalinnovation • Upgradingfacilitiesnecessary to implementinnovative practices (i.e. for new curricula and teachingmethods, for the development of new services)
Structural Projects – Examples of Activities • Strengtheningof internationalisation of higher education systems; • Introduction of Bologna-type reforms(i.e. three-level cycle system, quality assurance, evaluation) • Implementation of transparency tools such as credit systems, accreditation procedures, guidelines for the recognition of prior and non-formal learning; • Strengthening the integration of education, research and innovation
– Structure ? Eligible Partners? Who can participate? - Associated Partners
Structural Projects: Partner Country Ministries for HE must participate Min.3 HEI from the Partner Country Min.2 HEI from each Partner Country Min.1 HEI from each Programme Country Min.1 HEI from each Programme Country At least as many Partner Country HEIs as Programme Country HEIs At least as many Partner Country HEIs as Programme Country HEIs • Exception Russia Latin America, Syria National Projects (1 Partner Country only + min. 3 Programme Countries) Multi-Country Projects (≥ 2 Partner Countries+ min. 3 Programme Countries)
Ex.1a : minimum consortia: national project (6 HE institutions) Min. 1 Partner Country: at least as many HEIs as in the Programme Countries Min. 3 Programme Countries min. 1 HEI each BonnUniversity Rome University London University UK
Ex.2: minimum consortia: multi-country project (7 institutions) Min. 2 Partner Countries Min. 2 HEIs each Min. 3 Programme Countries: Min. 1 HEI each Paris University London University Ankara University Turkey
Example 3: consortia composition (multi-country project) 2 partner countries 3 programme countries Abai University MadridUniversity Kazakh University Spain Wien Uni. Linz Uni. Kiew Uni. Salzburg Uni. Cherkasy Uni. Ukraine Lviv Uni. Italy Turin Uni. Roma Uni. Nizhyn Uni. Bukovina Uni. Genoa Uni.
Partnership Agreement • Mandatory • To besubmitted to the Agency within 6 months of the signature of grant contract (Signed by the legal rep.) • Joint (one doc signed by all partners) or Bilateral (partner A + coordinating inst.) • Template available to be adapted to specific needs of partnership • Comprehensive : covering all aspects of the project: • The partners role and responsibilities; • Financial Management; • Project Management; • Project Quality Assurance; • Student issues • Decision/Conflict resolution mechanisms
Part III – The application and Selection procedure
Lessons Learned • Relatively high percentage of ineligible applications due to insufficient understanding of minimum requirements for consortia; • National/regional priorities established for the Partner Country need to be respected and matched with the local needs (assessed in award criterion 'relevance'); • A need to mobilise new institutions both in Programme and Partner Countries, as grant holders and/or partners; • Outreach beyond the capital cities to institutions in the regions and the periphery; • Lack of innovative approaches (new content and methodologies); Erasmus+
Key messages for the 3rd Call • Diversify the type of applicantsinvolving new institutions; • Intensify efforts to encourage the cooperation with Asian countries; • Disseminate widely the opportunity to cooperate with ACP countries; • Pay particular attention to the eligibility criteria, mainly minimum number of nationally recognised HEIs in consortia; • Respect strictly the national / regional priorities addressed to each Partner Country affecting the score on Relevance (threshold of 50% must be reached to pass to the next selection stages); • Insist on the need to empower the Partner Country partners from the early stages of the proposal preparation.
Indicative budget and Calendar for 2017 Call Start of the Grant Agreement end 07/2017 02/2017 03-04/2017 05-06/2017 15/10/2017 07/2017 09/02/2017 07-08/2017
Application and Selection procedureIndicative roadmap for selection process-CBHE
What is assessed? Award Criteria To be considered for funding, proposals must score at least 60 points in total and - out of these points at least 15 points for "Relevance"
CBHE Information sources Erasmus+ website - EACEA http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus-plus_en Erasmus+ website – EU Commission http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/index_en.htm International E+ Contact Points (ICPs) in Programme Countries https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus-plus/contacts/international-erasmus-plus-contact-points_en National Erasmus+ Offices (NEOs) in certain Partner Countries (PCs) https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus-plus/contacts/national-erasmus-plus-offices_en