1 / 25

Early Selection

Early Selection. Early Selection model postulated that attention acted as a strict gate at the lowest levels of sensory processing Based on concept of a limited capacity bottleneck. Early Selection. Early Selection model failed to explain some findings

adelio
Download Presentation

Early Selection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Early Selection • Early Selection model postulated that attention acted as a strict gate at the lowest levels of sensory processing • Based on concept of a limited capacity bottleneck

  2. Early Selection • Early Selection model failed to explain some findings • Shadowing studies found that certain information could “intrude” into the attended stream • Subject’s name, loud noises, etc.

  3. Late Selection • Late Selection models postulated that attention acted on later processing stages (not sensory)

  4. Late vs. Early • Various hybrid models have been proposed • Early attenuation of non-attended input • Late enhancement of attended input

  5. Electrophysiological Investigations of Attention

  6. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • The theory is that attention acts as an early selection filter • The prediction is that selective auditory attention modulates early responses in the auditory pathway • Hernandez-Peon (1956) • Electrodes in cats • Attended tones elicited more rapid spike trains What was the critical confound?

  7. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Failed to rule out overt orienting • Cats can orient their ears without moving their heads • Not surprising that auditory responses went up when cat swiveled its ears • Solution was to careful monitor subject’s orienting with eye trackers and present stimuli through headphones

  8. Modulation of Auditory Pathways attending LEFT Ignoring RIGHT • Hillyard et al. (1960s) attention effects in human auditory pathway using ERP • Selective listening task using headphones • Every few minutes the attended side was reversed • Thus they could measure the brain response to identical stimuli when attended or unattended beep beep beep beep boop beep beep beep beep boop beep beep

  9. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Result: ERP elicited by attended and unattended stimuli diverges by about 90ms post stimulus • Long before response is made • Probably in primary or nearby auditory cortex

  10. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Other groups have found ERP modulation even earlier – as early as Brainstem Auditory Response • Probably no robust modulation as low as cochlea • by ~40 ms, feed forward sweep is already well into auditory and associated cortex • Thus ERP effects may reflect recurrent rather than feed forward processes

  11. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Different ways to use attention in space attending LEFT Ignoring RIGHT now left, now right, now left, now right beep beep beep beep boop beep beep beep beep boop beep beep beep beep beep beep boop beep beep beep beep boop beep beep SUSTAINED TRANSIENT

  12. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Response times are faster for attended relative to unattended targets • The theory is that transient and sustained attention act on auditory pathways the same way now left, now right, now left, now right beep beep beep beep boop beep beep beep beep boop beep beep TRANSIENT

  13. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone

  14. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone BEEP

  15. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone

  16. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone BEEP

  17. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone

  18. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone BEEP

  19. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone

  20. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Three speakers • Steady stream of tones • Respond to each tone BEEP

  21. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • We can compare targets preceded by targets at the same location with targets preceded by targets on the other side

  22. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Transient Attention: The Target-Target Paradigm • Does transient attention modulate auditory system like sustained attention?

  23. - CZ CZ + 100 200 300 400 500 100 200 300 400 500 Tata et al. (2001) Tata et al. (2001) Tata, Prime, McDonald, & Ward (2001) Modulation of Auditory Pathways • ERP is markedly different in the two situations!

  24. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • ERP is markedly different in the two situations! • One possibility: • sustained attention allows for attentional configuration of sensory cortex to modulate feed-forward sweep but… • Transient attention can only modulate recurrent processes

  25. Modulation of Auditory Pathways • Earliest attention-related component (called the Nd1) is over contralateral posterior scalp - not primary cortex Tata & Ward (2005)

More Related