480 likes | 689 Views
Topics . Acoustic Optical Modulator Faster scanning methods Laser trapping Fluorescence lifetime imaging. Acousto-optic modulator. RF (100 MHz) on Transducer sets up Acoustic wave in Second crystal, Forms grating. 0 th order. Bragg Diffraction: sound waves diffract light
E N D
Topics • Acoustic Optical Modulator • Faster scanning methods • Laser trapping • Fluorescence lifetime imaging
Acousto-optic modulator RF (100 MHz) on Transducer sets up Acoustic wave in Second crystal, Forms grating 0th order Bragg Diffraction: sound waves diffract light Can achieve ~90% diffraction efficiency into 1st order spot
Double-slit Experiment Condition for Constructive interference: a sinθ = nλ n = 0, 1, 2, 3 … Afterfocusing: d = f λ / a
Applications of Acousto-optic Modulators in microscopes • Select Wavelength (tunable filter AOTF): vary drive frequency: • Achieve same angle of deflection • (wavelength dependent, spacing of grating) • 2) Control Laser Power: vary RF power to change diffraction fraction • 3) Control Beam angle for fast scanning: vary frequency for same , • fixed power (achieves different deflected angle)
Laser line selection AOTF to select laser line and power (drive frequency and RF power, respectively)
Acousto-optic beam deflector Sweep beam by Changing deflection (linearized) Scanning in a confocal microscope: very fast Compared to galvo mirrors ~100 fold (paper next week)
Faster Imaging than with two galvos: line scanning + one galvo
Detection on line-scanning microscope Slit pinholes Linear CCD
Spinning disk microscopy Uses White light: convenient but very poor light budget
Modern Design Microlens focuses on Pinholes, conjugate To specimen plane CCD detection, Much higher quantum efficiency Than PMT
Spinning disk microscopy • Advantages: • Can image very rapidly ( image collection not limited by scanning mirrors • 2. Use of cooled CCD camera yields lower noise than PMT (un-cooled) higher quantum yield • Disadvantages: • Light path not efficient (need powerful light source) • Fixed pixel size • Disk needs to match objective • Lose spatial control of excitation field • Problem with very thick samples
Dielectric material • n > n(surroundings) • Force range is in pN
How to measure the force? Stochastic force Langevin equation
Langevin equation power spectrum
Position sensing with Quadrant photodiodes x = [(B+D) - (A+C)] / [A+B+C+D]y = [(A+B) - (C+D] / [A+B+C+D]
Direct observation of base-pair stepping by RNA polymerase Abbondanzieri EA, Greenleaf WJ, Shaevitz JW, Landick R, Block SM Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):460-5
Simple But low resolution Stepping size per base pair = 3.4 Å
Summary: • Decouple from stage • Helium environment • Passive force clamp
HOT Holographic Optical Tweezers
Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging • Sensitive to environment: pH, ions, potential • SNARF, Calcium Green, Cameleons • Perform in vitro calibrations • Results Not sensitive to bleaching artifacts • Not sensitive to uneven staining (unless self-quenched) • Not sensitive to alignment (intensity artifacts)
Fluorescence Quantum Yield φ: important for dyes Ratio of emitted to absorbed photons Quantum Yield: (k is rate, Inverse of time) Natural lifetime Measured lifetime is sum of Rates of natural lifetime and non radiative decay paths
Unquenched and Quenched Emission Unquenched emission: Normal QY, lifetime Quenched emission Decreased QY, lifetime e.g. metals, aggregation
2 general approaches: time domain and frequency domain Short pulse laser modulate CW laser
Frequency Domain Methods for Lifetime Measurements: Modulate laser and measure phase change of fluorescence Use cw laser (e.g. argon ion) Modulate at rate near Inverse of emission lifetime 10-100 MHz Measure phase change with Lockin amplifier
Time-domain Widefield Lifetime imaging with ICCD Variable delayed gate is scanned To sample exponential decay: Many frames ICCD has no time intrinsic response: slow readout Gated gain Two-photon has short pulse laser for time-gating
Time-correlated single photon counting: • most flexibility, most accurate, • samples whole decay • Best time response Measures time of flight of photons After excitation pulse Bins data at each time interval Rather than gating Collect enough photons to approximate exponential: Slower than gating but Better measurement, Can separate biexponentials: Multiple components
Principles of time-correlated single photon counting TAC or TDC measures time of flight, bins photons
B&H addon to Zeiss Laser scanning confocal Electronics all in one PCI board, ~50K addon
Time gating measurements of fluorescence decay Temporal Resolution defined by IRF (laser, detector, electronics) Real IRF Ideal IRF Gate away from IRF (laser pulse, PMT response) Lose photons IRF=instrument response function, Must be (much) shorter than fluorescence lifetime (delta function) to avoid convolution Measure IRF with reflection or known short lifetime e.g. Rose Bengal (90 ps)
PMT Detectors for Lifetime measurements Dispersion in time of flight across 14 dynodes Limits time response ~300 picosecond resolution Better with deconvolution Cost ~$500 Microchannel plate photomultiplier: full of holes, kick off electrons ~30 picosecond resolution No dispersion Cost ~$15000 fragile PMTS have low quantum yield (10-20%), MCP worse ~5%
Intensity vs fluorescence lifetime image Same dye, different lifetime because of environment
FRET Outcomes Acceptor increases Donor decreases Intensity Lifetime
CFP and YFP FRET by Lifetime Imaging Channel changes conformation, distance changes, Donor quenching occurs due to FRET Short lifetime is FRET from Donor For given pixel Ratio of fast to slow decay coefficients is estimate of FRET efficiency
FLIM as Diagnostic of Joint Disorder Fixed, thin sections H&E staining Widefield fluorescence Little info Widefield FLIM Detail revealed by FLIM
Intensity and lifetime measurements CFP-YFP linked by short peptide chain Energy is transferred from CFP to YFP Lifetime reveals info intensity does not