1 / 69

Szklarska Poreba -9 – 2008

Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem. Szklarska Poreba -9 – 2008. By Oshri Weiss The IJN and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Talk outline. Introduction The Rationality Debate. Pragmatic considerations Related to the Asian disease problem. Empirical study Goal

adena-sanders
Download Presentation

Szklarska Poreba -9 – 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem Szklarska Poreba-9 – 2008 By Oshri Weiss The IJN and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  2. Talk outline • Introduction • The Rationality Debate • Pragmatic considerations • Related to the Asian disease problem • Empirical study • Goal • Methodology • Main predictions • Experiment 1 • Experiment 2 • Experiment 3 • Experiment 4 • Appendices • Appendix A: References • Appendix B: The invariance rule • Appendix C: Results • Appendix D: Quotes • Open questions and Further study Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  3. Introduction - The Rationality Debate The standard methodology used for reasoning studies: • A: • Present a reasoning task with a given construction in mind • B: • Use the responses in order to infer and evaluate the reasoning process The problem: • The inference is valid only if the respondents are using the same construction of the task as intended by the author Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  4. Introduction - The Rationality Debate The inadequacy of the Standard Methodology A demonstration by a typical task of deductive reasoning: The task: • Hypothetical statement: • If it is raining (p) than it is cloudy (q) • Categorical premise: • It is raining (p); • It is cloudy (q); • It is not raining (~p); • It is not cloudy (~q) • Conclusion: • 1. p, 2. q, 3. ~p, 4.~q Models: • Standard model: p →q • Alternative models: A: q → p B: p ↔q Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  5. Introduction - The Rationality Debate The inadequacy of the Standard Methodology Evaluating the respondent’s answers: Standard model: • Valid inferences: (MP,MT) • Invalid inferences: (AC, DA) Alternative model A: • Valid inferences: (AC,DA) • Invalid inferences: (MP,MT) Alternative model B: • Valid inferences: (MP,MT, AC, DA) In addition to misevaluating the validity of the respondents’ answers, the standard model may assign to the respondents the wrong inferences scheme Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  6. Introduction - The Rationality Debate The “standard methodology” Conclusion and the criticism Often, the respondents are using a different construction of the task than the constrictions intended by the authors. Considering these alternative constructions the respondents answers do not violate the rules of rational thinking There is a systematic diversity from normative models of decision - making and rational judgment Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  7. Introduction - The Rationality Debate Alternative methodology To evaluate the respondents’ reasoning according their own interpretation of the task and the given information Considering the respondents’ own interpretation, the inference from their answer to the reasoning task and the underlying cognitive process is valid Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  8. Pragmatic Considerations The Asian disease problem Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  9. Pragmatic Considerations The Asian disease problem By Tversky and Kahneman(1981) • The Experiment • A choice between a certainand a probable outcome is presented in two versions • once from a positive perspective • and once from a negative perspective • The two versions share the same cover story and differ only in the choice of alternatives • The Findings • Majority of subjects have chosen the certain option when the outcomes are phrased in positive terms • 72% • Majority of subjects have chosen the probable outcome when the outcomes are phrased in negative terms • 78% • The Interpretation • Since the two sure and the two probable outcomes are equivalent this answer pattern is violating the invariance rule Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  10. The Asian disease problem The argument of the opposing view • According to K&T’s standard construction of the problem the two certain outcomes are equivalent thus • the outcome that 200 people will be saved implies the outcome that 400 people will die and vice versa • The information given for the sure outcomes is incomplete • thus in the positive framing condition it is only mentioned explicitly that 200 people will be saved and • in the negative framing condition it is only mentioned explicitly that 400 people will die. • Thisleads to alternative constructions of the problem • the certain outcomes allows that more than 200 people will be saved in the positive framing • and more than 400 people will die in the negative framing Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  11. Therefore The Asian disease problem The argument of the opposing view • Under the alternative construction of the problem: • the certain outcome in the positive framing condition is better in terms of expected utility than the certain outcome in the negative framing condition. The answer pattern observed by K&T does not indicate a violation of the invariance rule Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  12. The empirical study Relating interpretations to subjects’ decisions Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  13. The empirical study The goal of the study To answer the question: “In what extent subjects’ interpretation of the given information determines their choices?” Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  14. The empirical study The methodology of the study • The methods I have used to address this question: 1. Manipulating the interpretation of the disputed information (the certain outcomes) and testing the effect of this manipulation on the subjects' responses 2. Detecting the actual interpretation of disputed information by the respondents • Combining the two methods would provide a stronger evidence for the alleged relation between the interpretation and the choice, than using either one of these two methods separately Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  15. The methodology of the empirical study Changes to the original problem • Encouraging the respondents to make the “standard” interpretation of the problem • by adding the word "exactly" to the description of the certain outcomes • the certain outcome in the positive framing was changed to: • If program A is adopted, exactly 200 people will be saved • the certain outcome in the negative framing was cahnged to: • If program C is adopted, exactly 400 people will die Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  16. The methodology of the empirical study Detecting the subject’s interpretation • To detect the interpretation of the certain outcome of each subject: • I have used a multiple-choice question • this method provides clear answer to the question • whether the subject had an alternative interpretation for the certain option • as opposed to other methods, which do not limit the subjects to a predetermined answer set Following Dulany & Hilton the phrasing of this question was: What do you think the writer meant by the last statement: positive framing : “200 (exactly 200) people will be saved” negative framing : “400 (exactly 400) people will die” Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  17. The methodology of the empirical study Detecting the subject’s interpretation 2 • The subjects were then presented with a set of options representing possible interpretations of the certain outcomes • Two types of options were presented: • “standard” interpretation • “alternative” interpretations of the certain outcome Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  18. The empirical study Main predictions • Adding the word “exactly” would encourage the respondents to make the standard interpretation • This predicted influence on the respondents’ interpretation would be followed by a change in their choices. 3. Subjects who have the alternative interpretation will be more likely to choose the certain outcome in the positive framing and less likely to choose it in the negative framing. Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  19. The empirical study: Experiment 1 Specific characteristics • This experiment tested only the positive framing condition • Conditions • The subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions: • the “original positive” version of the problem • “exactly positive” version (the word “exactly was added to the description of the certain outcome) • There were no other differences between the two versions • Language • Hebrew • Time and place • The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2006 • Subjects • 191 participants • Material • Pen and pencil test • The order of questions: • To choose between the two programs • To answer the question designed to detect their interpretation Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  20. The empirical study: Experiment 1 The set of possible interpretations • The complete phrasing of the question was designed to detect the respondent’s interpretation: • What do you think the author meant by the sentence: (exactly) 200 people will be saved? • There is no "correct" answer to this question, just choose the interpretation • Which is most suited to your understanding of the author's intention when you were making your choice? • Please mark one option: 1. 200 people will be saved now, and 400 people will die now. 2. It is certain that 200 people will be saved, and it is likely that 400 people will die 3. 200 people will be saved, and it is possible that more people will be saved 4. It is certain that 200 people will be saved, and it is certain that 400 people will die. • Choosing options 1 or 4 was considered as indicating the standard interpretation of the certain outcome • 200 people will be saved and 400 people will die • Choosing options 2 or 3 was considered as indicating the alternative interpretation of the certain outcome • it is possible that more than 200 people will be saved. Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  21. The empirical study: Experiment 1 Predictions • Prediction A • There will be more “perhaps more” interpretations in the “positive original” version than in the “positive exactly” version. • Prediction B • More respondents will be choosing the certain outcome in the “positive original” version than in the “positive exactly” version. • Prediction C • The participants who interpret the certain outcome as allowing that more than 200 people will be saved(as indicated by choosing options 2 or 3) will be more likely to choose the certain outcome than the participants who have the standard interpretation of the certain outcome(as indicated by choosing options 1 or 4) Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  22. The empirical study: Experiment 1 Results for experiment 1 • Prediction A - Confirmed • Subjects were more likely to make the: “perhaps more” interpretation in the: “positive original” version than in the: “positive exactly” version • Prediction B - Confirmed • Subjects were more likely to choose the certain outcome in the: “positive original” version than in the: “positive exactly” version • Prediction C - Confirmed • The participants who interpreted the certain outcome as allowing that more than 200 people will be saved were more likely to choose the certain outcome than the participants who make the standard interpretation of the certain outcome Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  23. The empirical study: Experiment 1 Discussion • The confirmation of all the three predictions of the Pragmatic analysis support the claim • The preference of the certain alternative in the positive framing of the Asian Disease problem is due to the phrasing of this alternative. • But there is an alternative explanation to the findings of experiment 1: • Since the "interpretation question" was presented after the choice, the subjects' answers to the "interpretation question" could be influenced by the desire to justify their choice. Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  24. The empirical study: Experiment 2 The goal: to rule out the alternative explanation of the findings of experiment 1 • The method • it was assured that the respondents’ answers to the “interpretation question” would not be influenced by the desire to justify their choice • The technique • the “interpretation question” was presented immediately after the problem and before presenting the choice between the two alternative programs Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  25. The empirical study: Experiment 2 Specific characteristics • The changed order of questions is the only difference between the designs of experiments 2 and experiment 1 • Conditions • The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: • the “original positive” version of the problem • the “exactly positive” version • There were no other differences between the two versions • Language • Hebrew • Time and place • The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2006 • Subjects • 74 participants • Material • Pen and pencil test • The order of questions: • To answer the question designed to detect their interpretation • To choose between the two programs Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  26. The empirical study: Experiment 2 Results for experiment 2 • Prediction A - Confirmed • Subjects were more likely to make the “perhaps more” interpretation in the “positive original” version than in the “positive exactly” version • Prediction B - Confirmed • Subjects were more likely to choose the certain outcome in the “positive original” version than in the “positive exactly” version • Prediction C - Confirmed • The participants who interpreted the certain outcome as allowing that more than 200 people will be saved were more likely to choose the certain outcome than the participants who make the standard interpretation of the certain outcome Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  27. The empirical study: Experiment 2 Discussion • The findings of experiment 2 support the findings of experiment 1 by: • Establishing the independence between the confirmation of predictions A and B • Replicating the results of experiment 1 Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  28. The empirical study - The first 2 experiments Conclusions • The alternative interpretation of the certain outcome as allowing that more than 200 people will be saved accounts (at least partially) for the subjects' preference of the certain outcome in the positive framing condition 2. These findings questions the claim that the seemingly inconsistent responses observed by K&T are reflecting a violation of the invariance rule Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  29. The empirical study - The first 2 experiments Problems and criticism 1. What about the negative framing? • The first 2 experiments have not tested the negative framing condition and therefore they are not sufficient for answering the question of whether or not the subjects’ answers violate invariance 2. Interpreting the numbers as a maximum amount: • Numbers are sometimes used to indicate an upper limit • Mother to the child: “You can eat 3 cookies” • Some of the subjects may have such interpretation of the certain outcomes • If subjects who make the “at least 200 people will be saved” interpretation in the positive framing also make the “at most 400 people will die” interpretation in the negative framing • Then choosing the certain outcome in the positive framing and the probable outcome in the negative framing is still a violation of the invariance rule Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  30. The empirical study: Experiment 3 Goal: To address the limitations of experiments 1 and 2 • Addressing the negative framing as well by: • Adding 2 additional conditions • Testing the “at most 200(400)” interpretations: • adding an option reflecting the • “200 (400) and maybe less” interpretation to the set of multiple choices of the “interpretation question” Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  31. The empirical study: Experiment 3 Specific characteristics • In this experiment both, the positive and the negative framing conditions were tested. • Conditions • The subjects were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: 1. the “original positive” version of the problem 2. the “exactly positive” version 3. The “original negative” version 4. the “exactly negative” version • Language • English • Time and place • Various gatherings of the English speaking community in Paris, 2007 • Subjects • 129 participants • Material • Pen and pencil test • The order of questions: • To choose between the two programs • To answer the question designed to detect their interpretation Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  32. The empirical study: Experiment 3 The set of possible interpretations The positive framing conditions • 200 people will be saved now and 400 people will die now • It is certain that 200 people will be saved, and it is likely that 400 people will die • 200 people will be saved, and it is possible that more than 200 people will be saved • It is certain that 200 people will be saved, and it is certain that 400 people will die. • 200 people will be saved, and it is possible that less than 200 people will be saved • Choosing options 1 or 4 • were considered as indicating the standard interpretation of the certain outcome that 200 people will be saved and 400 people will die • Choosing options 2 or 3 • were considered as indicating interpretation that at least 200 people will be saved • Choosing option 5 • was considered as indicating interpretation that at most 200 people will be saved. Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  33. The empirical study: Experiment 3 The set of possible interpretations The negative framing conditions • 400 people will die now and 200 people will be saved now. • It is certain that 400 people will die, and it is likely that 200 people will be saved. • 400 people will die , and it is possible that more than 400 people will die. • It is certain that 400 people will die , and it is certain that 200 people will be saved. • 400 people will die , and it is possible that less than 400 people will die. • Choosing options 1 or 4 • were considered as indicating the standard interpretation of the certain outcome that 400 people will die and that 200 people will be saved. • choosing options 2 or 3 • were considered as indicating interpretation that at least 400 people will die • choosing option 5 • was considered as indicating interpretation that at most 400 people will die Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  34. The empirical study - Experiment 3 Results – experiment 3 Interpretations • Positive framing • The influence of adding the word “exactly” to the interpretation of the certain outcome: • Reduction in the number of: “at least 200” and: “at most 200” interpretation • An increase in the number of: “exactly 200” interpretations • The reduction in the number of: “at least 200” interpretations was smaller than in experiments 1 and 2 • Negative framing • The influence of adding the word “exactly” on the interpretation of the certain outcome • There was not any considerable difference between the two negative versions Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  35. The empirical study – Experiment 3 Results – experiment 3 Negative framing • The proportion of risk averse subjects • Contrary to the predictions of the Pragmatic Analysis • subjects were more likely to choose the certain outcome in the “negative original” version • 24% • than in the “negative exactly” version • 20% • The correlation between the interpretation and choice • Contrary to the predictions of the Pragmatic Analysis Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  36. The empirical study: Experiment 3 Discussion • The results of the positive framing provide additional evidence to the claimed relation between the interpretation and choice • The fact that the subjects are much more likely to make the “at least 200” interpretation in the positive framing than to make the “at most 400” interpretation in the negative framing suggests that there is a considerable group of respondents that considering their own interpretation of the certain outcomes do not violate invariance • On the other hand, the findings of the negative framing does not confirm the hypothesis that the preference of the probable outcome in the negative framing condition is related to the interpretation of the certain outcome. Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  37. The empirical study – Experiment 3 Open questions Why are the negative and positive framings different? • Suggested answer • It is possible that some respondents view the description of the programs with the certain outcomes as a commitment made by the proposing scientists manifesting a worse case scenario. • A respondent with this construction in mind would have both the “at least 200” and the “at most 400” interpretations • The existence of a group of subjects with such a construction could explain the findings that adding the word exactly reduces the proportion of risk averse choices in the positive framing condition but does not increases the proportion of risk averse choices in the negative framing condition • Nevertheless the fact that the “at most 400” interpretation in the negative framing is not as common as the “at least 200” interpretation in the positive framing raises some doubts Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  38. The empirical study: Experiment 3 Standing issues: Problems with the set of possible interpretations • The phrasing of the options representing the “standard interpretation” • The task of comparing between these 5 options might be too demanding for some of the subjects • The set includes only 1 option reflecting the “perhaps less” interpretation whereas there are 2 options representing each of the two other interpretations Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  39. The empirical study: Experiment 4 Goal: To simplify and to improve the set of possible interpretations. • Addressing the first issue • The phrasing of the option reflecting the standard interpretation was changed • Addressing the second and third issues: • The answer set includes only 3 options in order to: • reduce the cognitive load involved in comparing the alternatives • equalizethe number of options representing each possible interpretation • In addition, the respondents could specify their interpretation in their own words. Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  40. The empirical study: Experiment 4 Specific characteristics • Conditions • The subjects were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: 1. “positive original 2. “positive exactly” 3. “negative original” 4.“negative exactly” • Language • English • Time and place • Various gatherings of the English speaking community in Paris, 2007-2008 • Subjects • 118 participants. • Material • Pen and pencil test • The order of the questions • For half of the subjects the order was: • To answer the question designed to detect their interpretation • To choose between the two programs • For the other half of the subjects the order was reversed: • To choose between the two programs • To answer the question designed to detect their interpretation Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  41. The empirical study: Experiment 4 The set of possible interpretations The positive framing conditions • 200 people, and perhaps more, will be saved • 200 people, no more and no less, will be saved • 200 people, and perhaps less, will be saved • Other (please specify): • Option 1 reflects the: • “at least 200” interpretation • Option 2 reflects the: • “exactly 200” interpretation • Options 3 reflects the: • “at most 200” interpretation Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  42. The empirical study: Experiment 4 The set of possible interpretations The negative framing conditions • 400 people, and perhaps more, will die • 400 people, no more and no less, will die • 400 people, and perhaps less, will die • Other (please specify): • Option 1 reflects the: • “at least 400” interpretation, • Option 2 reflects the: • “exactly 400” interpretation • Options 3 reflects the: • “at most 400” interpretation Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  43. The empirical study - Experiment 4 Results – experiment 4 Interpretations • Positive framing • The influence of adding the word “exactly” on the interpretation of the certain outcome: • Reducing the number of: “at least 200” “at “most 200” and: “more or less 200” (other). • Increasing the number of: “exactly 200” • Negative framing • The influence of adding the word “exactly” on the interpretation of the certain outcome: • Reducing the number of: “at least 400” and “at “most 400” • Increasing the number of: “exactly 400” Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  44. The empirical study - Experiment 4 Results – experiment 4 The correlation between the interpretation and choice • Positive framing • Contrary to the previous studies: • The participants with the: “at least 200” interpretation were as likely to choose the certain outcome as the participants with the: “exactly 200” interpretation • Subjects from both groups were more likely to choose the certain outcome than the participants who make the: “at most 200” interpretation • Negative framing • The results were mixed: • The participants who had the: “at least 400” interpretation were more likely to choose the certain outcome. • Than the participants who make the standard interpretation of the certain outcome. • Contrary to the predictions of the Pragmatic Analysis • But less likely than the participants who make the interpretation that it is possible that less than 400 people will die • In accordance with the predictions of the Pragmatic Analysis Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  45. The empirical study – Experiment 4 Results – experiment 4 The proportion of risk averse subjects • Negative framing • Contrary to the predictions of the Pragmatic Analysis • subjects were more likely to choose the certain outcome in the “negative original” version • 31% • than in the “negative exactly” version • 10% Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  46. The empirical study: Experiment 4 Summary of the results • The influence of adding the word “exactly” on the proportion of risk averse choices in the positive framing condition was replicated • As opposed to the previous studies there was not a strong relation between the interpretation and choice neither in the positive nor in the negative conditions • Comparing to the findings of experiment 3 the most striking difference is a reduction in the number of subjects making the “at least n” interpretation, particularly in the positive framing condition Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  47. The empirical study – Experiments 3 and 4 Open questions Which one of the two set of possible interpretations is better? • One might argue that the set used in experiment 3 over estimated the proportion of subjects making the “at least 200 (400)” interpretations • Therefore, the set used in experiment 4 is more adequate for reflecting the respondent’s construction of the task • But in that case ,the correlation between the interpretation and choice found in experiments 1-3 should be even stronger in experiment 4 • Thus, there is a dissonance between the theoretical adequacy of the set used in experiment 4 and the empirical confirmation of the set used in experiment 3 Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  48. Further study 1 Additional experiment Using a between-subject design • The Method • Experimentally manipulating the alternative interpretations by adding two additional phrasing: • “At least 200 (400) people will be saved (die)” • “At most 200 (400) people will be saved (die)” • Advantages: • To provide a measure of the relation between having the alternative interpretations and the choices which does not rely on the phrasing of the interpretation question • Disadvantages: • Requires many respondents Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  49. Further study 2 Using a within-subject design • K&T study and my own experiments were using a between- subject design: • in which each participant is presented with either the positive or the negative version of the problem. • In within-subjects design each subject is presented with both the positive and the negative version of the problem. • The method: • To detect each one of the respondents’ interpretation of the presented problem in a with-in subject design • The benefits: • Estimating the proportion of subjects who violate invariance considering their own interpretation • Studying the relation between the tendency to have alternative interpretation to several factors that underlines inter personal variety in reasoning task, such as general intelligence Stanovich & West (1998) Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

  50. Appendix A: References • Berkeley, D. & Humphreys, P. “Structuring decision problems and the "bias heuristic“ “. Acta Psychologica, 50, 201-252, 1982 • Dulany, D.L & Hilton D.J.: "Conversational Implicature, Conscious Representation, and the Conjunction Fallacy." Social cognition 9, (85-109), 1991 • Hilton D.J.: "The Social Context of Reasoning: Conversational Inference and Rational Judgment". Psychological Bulletin, 118, No 2 (248-271), 1995 • Kahneman D. and Tversky A : • "The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice". Science , 211, No 30 (453-458), 1981 • "Choices, Values and Frames" American Psychologist, 39 No 4 (341-350), 1984 • "Theoretical Notes On the Reality of Cognitive Illusions". Psychological Review, 103, No 3, (582-591), 1996 • Kühberger A.: "The Framing of Decisions: A new look at Old Problems". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, No2, (230-240), 1995 • Politzer G.: "Reasoning, Judgment and Pragmatics" in Dan Sperber and Ira A. Noveck (ed.) Experimental Prgmatics, Palgrave Macmillan New York (94-115), 2004 • Politzer G. and Noveck I.: "Are Conjunction Rule Violations the Result of Conversational Rule Violations?" Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 20, No.2 (83-103), 1991 • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. • "Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects." Thinking and Reasoning, No 4, (289–317), 1998 • "Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?" Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23 (645–726), 2000 Pragmatic analysis of the Asian Disease problem by Oshri Weiss oshriweiss@gmail.com

More Related