860 likes | 1.01k Views
What is.. Evidence Based Health Care ? Craig Mellis University of Sydney . Objectives: 1. Traditional (“Mark 1”) EBHC. Objectives: 1. ‘Traditional’ EBHC 2. ‘New’ (“Mark 2”) EHBC. Objectives: 1. ‘Traditional’ EBHC 2. ‘New’ EHBC 3. What Y OU ..‘Need-to-Know’.. …to practice EBHC.
E N D
What is.. Evidence Based Health Care ?Craig MellisUniversity of Sydney
Objectives: 1. ‘Traditional’ EBHC 2. ‘New’ (“Mark 2”) EHBC
Objectives: 1. ‘Traditional’ EBHC 2. ‘New’ EHBC 3. What YOU ..‘Need-to-Know’.. …to practice EBHC
EBM & CLINICAL DECISION MAKING Brian Haynes
Assess the Patient Ask Q..? Acquire Act Apply Appraise
Assess Patient Ask Q..? Acquire Act Apply Appraise
Assess Patient Ask Q Acquire the Evidence Act Apply Appraise
Assess Patient Ask Acquire Act Apply Appraise the evidence
Assess Patient Ask Acquire Action Applicable..? Appraise Steps involved in ‘traditional’ EBHC
History … Jack, 16 months • Viral URTI .. 2-3 days • Cough & Wheeze .. 24 hours • Woke up this am with.. “Loud Wheeze & difficulty breathing” -> ED…
History … Jack, 16 months • Viral URTI .. 2-3 days • Cough & Wheeze .. 24 hours • Woke up this am with.. “Loud Wheeze & difficulty breathing” -> ED… • No prior wheeze / atopy • No FH asthma / atopy
Physical Examination: + Moderate Resp Distress + Audible Wheeze + Signs of U.R.T.I
Physical Examination: + Moderate Resp Distress + Audible Wheeze + Signs of U.R.T.I + Chest wall retractions + Mild nasal flaring
Physical Examination: + Moderate Resp Distress + Audible Wheeze + Signs of U.R.T.I + Chest wall retractions + Mild nasal flaring + Resp Rate = 42 / min + Pulse Rate = 102 / min + SaO2 (air) = 90%
Dx: Viral Induced Wheeze …Moderate resp distress
-> ED.. Progress • Dx: Viral Induced Wheeze …Moderate resp distress • Initial Tmt: * Oxygen via face mask -> SaO2 > 95% * Salbutamol ..4 puffs (via puffer+spacer) -> ?..Minimal response
-> ED.. Progress • OE: Viral Induced Wheeze … Mild-moderate resp distress • Initial Tmt: Oxygen ->SaO2 > 95% ‘Ventolin’..4 puffs via puffer+spacer -> ?..Minimal response ?? Q… Add oral Corticosteroids
Background Information • Oral C’steroids E ffectiveschool-age children & adults with Asthma …ie, reduces need hospital admission
Background Information • Oral C’steroids =effective older children & adults w acute mod-severe asthma 2) Most infants & preschoolerswho wheeze ONLY with Viral URTI (Viral Associated Wheeze) DO NOT have asthma
Background Information 3) Genuine concern re Adverse Effects w repeated courses… ( espGrowth, weight gain, HPA axis)
You are in ED.. ? Will YOU… give Jack oral C’steroids: • YES • NO • UNSURE
How will YOU get answer..? • Phone a friend • Textbook • Medline (‘Pubmed’ / ’Ovid’) • “UptoDate” / “Clinical Evidence”
‘P I C O’ / ‘P I C O T’ …. • French word (re lace & embroidery) • Prefix for one trillionth ( 10-12 ) • Mnemonic for framing clinical questions • Spanish word for… ‘ a little bit’ • All of the above
Use PICO (T) to… Frame YOUR Clinical Questions
P I C O ( T ) format: • P opulation (disease group) • I ntervention • C omparator • O utcome • T ype Study
P I C O ( T ) format: • P opulation“..Among ..Pts w ‘Dis’ • I nterventionDoes… ‘Tmt A’ • C omparatorCompared to.. ‘Tmt B’ • O utcomeAffect… (eg, QoL).. ? ” • T ypeStudy< Ideal study type >
Jack’s Clinical Question..? • Population ? • Intervention ? • Comparator ? • Outcome ? • Type of Study ?
Jack’s Clinical Question • Population….. Viral Wheeze • Intervention… Oral C’steroid • Comparator… Placebo • Outcome… Length of Stay • Type of Study… Systematic Review -> RCT -> Cohort
Generating the search terms P = Viral Wheeze I = Oral C’steroids (C=placebo) (O=outcome) T = SystReview .. -> RCT
ACQUIRE…research Evidence • Use appropriate Electronic databases • Use Efficient SEARCH strategy
-> PubMed www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ -> “ Clinical Queries ”
Appraisal • VALID Study ? • IMPORTANTResults ? • APPLICABLE to your patient ?
… VALIDITY of the Evidence Use Checklist* …Depends on Type Question: • Therapy ( S/R or RCT) • Diagnosis • Prognosis • Harm * Users Guide
?...IMPORTANT RESULTS: ie, Effect size & 95% Confidence Interval ? Statistically significant ? Clinically Important