1 / 33

Nuclear reactions in the Sun

Gianni Fiorentini @Santa Tecla 2003. Nuclear reactions in the Sun. Episode I. A first look at the Sun A deeper look: helioseismology Neutrino: the spy of the innermost sun Nuclear reactions in the Sun, after SNO and KamLAND. Episode II. Episode I. M= 2 10 30 Kg R=7 10 8 m

adolph
Download Presentation

Nuclear reactions in the Sun

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gianni Fiorentini @Santa Tecla 2003 Nuclear reactions in the Sun Episode I • A first look at the Sun • A deeper look: helioseismology • Neutrino: the spy of the innermost sun • Nuclear reactions in the Sun, after SNO and KamLAND Episode II

  2. Episode I

  3. M= 2 1030 Kg R=7 108m Np=M/mp=1057 L=4 1026W A first look at the Sun • Observables: -Mass -Luminosity - Radius, - Metal content of the photosphere - Age • Inferences on the typical scales of the solar interior (r, P, T)

  4. Who measured the solar mass? Galileo Kelvin Cavendish Rolfs

  5. Solar mass 1s errors M= 2 1030 Kg • Astronomy only deals with the extremely well determined Gaussian constant: GNMo=(132 712 438 ±5) 1012 m3/s2 • Astrophysics needs Mo, since: - opacity is determined by Ne » Np » Mo/mp » 1057 - energy content/production of the star depends on Np. • Cavendish by determining GN provided a measurement of Mo • The (poor) accuracy on GN (0.15%)reflects on Mo Mo= 1.989 (1 ±0.15%) 1033 gr » 1057mp

  6. Solar Luminosity L=4 1026W • Derived from measurements of the solar constant Ko: the amount of energy per unit time and unit area, impinging from the Sun onto Earth. • Not precisely a constant, it varies with time (0.1% in a solar cycle). The average over 12 years of solar irradiance (and over different satellite radiometers) multiplied by Sun Earth distance, gives the solar luminosity: Lo=4pd2Ko =3.844(1 ±0.4%) 1033 erg/s (Lo= 10 17 nuclear power plants)

  7. R=7 108m Solar Radius • The distance from the center of the sun to its visible surface (the photosphere) • Difficult to define the edge of the sun • Different methods and different experiments: Ro=6.9598(1±0.04%) 1010 cm

  8. Solar Age • Method: radioactive dating of oldest objects in the solar system (chondritic meteorites) • Problems: • relationship between the age of the meteorite and the age of the sun • what is the the zero time for the sun? • The age of the sun referred to Zero Age Main Sequence t=4.57(1 ± 0.4%) Gyr

  9. Solar Metal abundance • Spectroscopic measurements of the solar photosphere yield the relative abundances (in mass) of “metals“ to H (Z/X)photo=0.0233(1 ± 6%) • Most abundant metals: O, C, N, Fe • Results are generally consistent with the meteoritic abundances • A remarkable exception: the solar Li content is depleted by 100 with respect to meteorites Note: Hydrogen abundance X~ 0.75

  10. A remark: Helium abundance • Helium was discovered in the Sun (1895), but its abundance cannot be accurately measured there • Until a few years ago, estimate of the photospheric He abundance was taken the result of solar models • Helioseismology provides now an indirect measurement…..

  11. Typical scales • density: r =3Mo/(4pRo3) »1.5 g/cm3 • pressure P » GMo2/Ro4» 1016 dine/cm2 • Sound speed vs» (P/r) 1/2» 800 Km/s • photon mean free path*: l=1/(nesTh) » 1/(1024 cm-3 10-24 cm2) » 1 cm (photon escape time »2 104 yr) • Cumulated energy production • DE =Lot » 10-4 Moc2 typical nuclear energy scale *astrophyscists use “opacity”k: l=1/(r k)

  12. Sun energy inventory • The present heat flow L can be sustained by an energy source U for an age t provided that U>Lt : • [yr] • a)chemistry: U» (1eV)Np -> tch=2 104 • b)gravitation U » GM 2/R -> tgr=3 107 • c)nuclear U »(1MeV)Np -> tnu=2 1010 • Only nuclear energy can sustain the Solar luminosity over the sun age, t=4.5 109 y • Can we prove that actually the Sun shines due to nuclear energy?

  13. M= 6 1024 Kg R=6 106m Np=M/mp=1051 HE=4 1013W A digression:The Earth energy inventory • It is not at all easy to understand the • dominant contribution to the Earth energy • production. • The present heat flow HE=40 TW can be • sustained by an energy source U for a time t=U/HE : • a)”chemistry”*): U=(0.1 eV)Np=6 1031J ->tch=5 1010 y • b)gravitation U=GM 2/R=4 1032J ->tgr=3 1011y • c)nuclear **) U=(1MeV)Np,rad =6 1030J -> tgr=5 109 y • -> Thus all energy sources seem capable to sustain HE on geological times. • *)actually it means the solidification (latent) heat • **)the amount of radioactive material is taken as Mrad» 10-8 MEarth

  14. What is the source of terrestrial heat? • J Verhoogen, in “Energetics of Earth” • (1980) N.A.S.: • “What emerges from this morass of fragmentary and uncertain data is that radioactivity itself could possibly account for at least 60 per cent if not 100 per cent of the Earth’s heat output”. • “If one adds the greater rate of radiogenic heat production in the past, possible release of gravitational energy (original heat, separation of the core…) tidal friction … and possible meteoritic impact … the total supply of energy may seem embarassingly large…” • Determination of the radiogenic component is thus important.

  15. The birth of Nuclear Astrophysics Eddington: Nature (1920) “Certain physical investigations in the past year make it probable to my mind that some portion of sub-atomic energy is actually being set free in a star. … If five per cent of a star's mass consists initially of hydrogen atoms, which are gradually being combined to form more complex elements, the total heat liberated will more than suffice for our demands, and we need look no further for the source of a star's energy…” DE =Lot» 10-4 Moc2 • In the same paper: “If indeed the sub-atomic energy in the stars is being freely used to maintain their great furnaces, it seems to bring a little nearer to fulfillment our dream of controlling this latent power for the well-being of the human race - or for its suicide”

  16. Nuclear reactions in the sun? The temperature scale • We have found scales for P and r • Need equation of state for deriving T. • Use perfect gas equation assuming the Sun consists of fully ionized hydrogen kT= P/(2np)=P mp/(2r)»1 keV (T » 1.2 107 K) • [Remark: kT>> e2/r » e2n1/3 implies perfect gas reasonable] • However: kT<< e2/rnuc» 1MeV

  17. The gross solar structure • Core R < 0.1 Ro M » 1/3 Mo (the site of nuclear reactions) • Radiative zone (0.1 ¸ 0.7) Ro M » 2/3 Mo • Convective zone (0.7 ¸ 1) Ro M » 2% Mo (As temperature drops, opacity increases and radiation is not efficient for energy transport) • Photosphere the very tiny layer of the Sun that we can observe directly

  18. How can we look at the solar interior? • “If there are more things in heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in our natural philosphy, it is partly because electromagnetic detection alone is inadequate” • We have two probes: Sound waves and Neutrinos

  19. Helioseismology • Birth: in 1960 it was found that the solar surface vibrates with a period T » 5 min, • Plan: reconstruct the properties of the solar interior by studying how the solar surface vibrates (as one studies the deep Earth ’s structure through hearthquakes or just like you can tell something about a material by listening to the sounds that it makes when something hits it)

  20. Method • By means of Doppler effect on the emitted radiation, one can measure oscillations of the solar surface with a very high accuracy • Most recent measurements performed with SOHO satellite (SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory) http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/

  21. The modes • The observed oscillations are decomposed into discrete modes. • Some 104 modes are available • Their frequencies are accurately determined (Dw/w» 10-3 - 10-4) • So far, only p-modes have been observed, i.e. pressure driven oscillations.

  22. Helioseismic inferences By comparing the measured frequencies with the calculated ones (inversion method) one can determine: • The sound speed profile (with accuracy of order 0.5%…see later) • Locate the transition between radiative transport and convection: Rb =0.711 (1 ± 0.14%) R • The photospheric He abundance: Yphoto= 0.249 (1± 1.4%)

  23. Standard Solar Model (SSM) • Bahcall (1995): “A SSM is one which reproduces, within uncertainties, the observed properties of the Sun, by adopting a set of physical and chemical inputs chosen within the range of their uncertainties”.

  24. SSM before Helioseismology: 3 data and 3 parameters • In order to produce a SSM one had to study the evolution of an initially homogeneous solar mass Mo up to the sun age t so as to reproduce Lo, Ro and (Z/X)photo • One can tune 3 parameters: -the initial Helium abundance Yin -the initial metal abundance(s) Zin -“the mixing length” parametera • Up to here, the SSM is not such a big success….

  25. The impact of helioseismology on SSM 3s Agreement of SSM with helioseismic data within very tiny errors (for u as well as Yph Rb..) 1s DU/U= (SSM-sun )/SSM * Dziembowki et al. Astrop. Phys. 7 (1997) 77

  26. List of applications of helioseismology By means of helioseismology one can constrain: • rotation in the solar interior • p+p cross section • screening effect • solar age [A&A 343 (1999) 990] • diffusion efficiency [A&A 342 (1999) 492] • existence of a mixed core [Astr. Phys. 8(1998) 293] • Axion production in the sun • WIMPs-matter interaction [hep-ph/0206211] • Existence of extra-dimensions [PLB 481(2000)291] • Possible deviations from standard Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution [PLB 441(1998)291] SUN EXOTIC

  27. Solar rotation • Solar surface does not rotate uniformely: T=24 days (30 days) at equator (poles). And the solar interior? • Helioseismology (after 6 years of data taking) shows that below the convective region the sun rotates in a uniform way • Note: Erot =1/2 m wrotR2» 0.02 eV Erot << KT

  28. An example: the helioseismic determination of p+p cross section (Spp) Degli Innocenti et al. PLB 416 (1998) 365 • Remind: Spp is not measured. • The value used in SSM Spp(SSM)=4(1 ± 2%) • x10-22KeVb • is derived from theory. • Build solar models with different Spp • Consistency with • helioseismology requires: • Spp=Spp (SSM)(1 ± 2%) • This accuracy is comparable to the theoretical uncertainty: DU/U (mod-SSM)/SSM

  29. energy radiative convective gener. transport transport Can helioseismogy probe the core of the Sun? • Accuracy degrades from 0.1 % to 1% as moving towards the solar center. • This follows form the fact that p modes do not propagate in the innermost part of the Sun m =mp/[2x+3/4 Y+1/2 Z] mean molecular weight core

  30. Can helioseismogy measure the solar temperature? • NO : to go from sound speed to temperature one needs the chemical composition • e.g, for a perfect gas: kT=P/n=(P/r)m • The abundances of elements (and EOS) is needed for translating sound speed into temperature. m =mp/[2x+3/4 Y+1/2 Z] mean molecular weight

  31. Can helioseismogy prove that the Sun is shining by nuclear reactions? • Just indirectly : Standard Solar Models, which assume that solar energy is generated by means of H-fusion into Helium are consistent with helioseismology.

  32. A first summary • The knowledge of M, R, L and age immediately determine the physical scales (T, P, r) of the solar interior and show that nuclear reactions are the only sufficient source of solar power. • Helioseismology provides an accurate picture of the solar interior, in excellent agreement with SSM calculations • The accuracy of helioseismology degrades in the solar core. • Helioseismology does not measure the temperature profile. • We need a proof that nuclear energy sustains the Sun

  33. See you later...

More Related