180 likes | 266 Views
Overview of New Mexico’s Tax System and Issues Before the 2009 Legislature. February 17, 2009 Richard Anklam, Executive Director Thomas Clifford, PhD, Research Director Richard.Anklam@nmtri.org. NMTRI Principles of Good Tax Policy.
E N D
Overview of New Mexico’s Tax Systemand Issues Before the 2009 Legislature February 17, 2009 Richard Anklam, Executive Director Thomas Clifford, PhD, Research Director Richard.Anklam@nmtri.org
NMTRI Principles of Good Tax Policy N.M. Tax Research Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan member-supported organization dedicated to advancing the following principles of good tax policy in New Mexico. • Adequacy • Revenues should be sufficient to fund needed services • Efficiency • Interference with the private economy should be minimized • Equity • Taxpayers should be treated fairly • Simplicity • Laws, regulations, forms and procedures should be as simple as possible • Comprehensiveness • All taxes should be considered when evaluating the system • Accountability • Exceptions should be rare and should be carefully evaluated and justified
FY 2007 State & Local Tax Collections: $7.9 Billion • High reliance on general sales taxes • Low reliance on property taxes • High reliance on severance taxes • About half of selective sales taxes are road fund revenues.
FY 2007 Tax Revenue Distributions: $7.9 Billion • Just over half of all tax revenue goes to the state’s General Fund • Local governments receive about one-third of all tax collections. • The state road fund receives about 5%, and the Severance Tax Bonding Fund about 6%.
Trends in Tax Collections • GRT has increased – primarily due to local tax rate increases • Property tax has increased due to assessed value growth • Income tax collections have decreased due to tax rate reductions. • Severance taxes increased sharply due to higher product prices.
Multistate Comparisons: FY 2002 • New Mexico’s state & local sector uses a relatively large proportion of total personal income. • N.M. relies heavily on sales tax, lightly on property tax and below average on Income tax. • Taxes imposed directly on businesses – rather than on households – are relatively high. Source: Congressional Quarterly, State Fact Finder. Except *COST, Annual Business Tax Study excluding severance taxes.
GRT base is much broader than retail sales • Hybrid between Retail Sales Tax (high rate) and Business Privilege Tax (broad base) • Large parts of household consumption are exempt – food, medical services • Reducing the base puts upward pressure on rates
Pyramiding of the GRT • Deductions for Business-to-business transactions are limited to resale and targeted industry-specific deductions. • Estimates of pyramided share of tax base range from 1/3 to 50% -- currently over $1 billion per year. • Pyramiding creates inefficiency and inequity in the tax system: • In-state companies face higher overhead than out-of-state competitors • Small businesses – which have to purchase more of their inputs from other firms – face higher overhead than large firms
Other GRT Issues • Regressivity • NM’s heavy reliance on sales taxes increases regressivity of the system • Reliance on services, b-t-b taxation reduces regressivity • Food, medical deductions and Income tax credits reduce regressivity • Base erosion due to remote commerce • Broad base makes GRT less vulnerable to base erosion • Statute limits the Compensating Tax, which otherwise would apply to remote sales • NM could join the Streamlined Sales Tax Project to encourage remote sellers to collect GRT • Political base erosion • Narrower base, higher rates increase pyramiding • Hold harmless provisions are increasing complexity and cost
2008 Property Tax Revenue Collections: Total $1.39 billion • About 1/3 of revenue goes to schools, mostly for capital outlay • 1/4 goes to Counties, mostly for operating expenditures • About 1/6 goes to municipalities. • About 10% each goes to hospitals (primarily UNMH) and higher education and • Slightly less than 5% goes to the state for GO bonds
Growth of Property Tax Obligations Since 2000 • Residential obligations have almost doubled – mainly due to assessed value growth. • Residential obligations have increased by 1/3 more than personal income. • Non-residential obligations are consistent with personal income growth.
Property Tax: Key Issues • Valuation limits create large disparities between taxpayers • Value limits and yield control have not prevented residential liabilities from growing much faster than income • Tax rates have not adjusted downward despite rapidly rising values: • Yield control does not include new construction • Voters are given an “all or nothing” option, either approving the amount of debt that can be financed by existing rates or none at all • Uneven administration creates wide disparities
Income Tax Issues • Adequacy: • Progressive rates cause “bracket creep” so revenue grows more quickly than income • Re-distribution: • Progressive rates shift burden from poor to rich • Efficiency • Recent rate decrease has brought rates into line with other states • Not yet clear how changes will affect revenue growth over time • Reduced progressivity is offset for low-income households by new tax credits and exemptions • Exemptions/Credits/Deductions: • Tax base is being eroded for non-tax policy goals • Threat to adequacy and efficiency
Corporate Income Tax Issues • A hard tax to justify: • Selective application – “C-corp.’s” only • Net income base is highly volatile • Incidence of tax burden is uncertain • Current law is a mixed bag for taxpayers: • Cons: Tax rates are high, and other provisions increase taxable income • Pros: Election to file as a separate, consolidated or combined gives taxpayers flexibility; Adhesion to federal tax base provides simplicity. • Combined reporting requirement would increase complexity • Definition of “unitary” is uncertain, would lead to litigation • Revenue impacts are highly unpredictable • NM has already succeeded in blocking abusive transactions
Road Fund Revenues • NM DoT reports being pinched by high costs, lower federal funding and aggressive expansion • NM and federal highway officials point out that revenues based on cents-per gallon fuels taxes and dollars-per-registration do not increase with inflation over time • Local officials complain about poor compliance with taxes on commercial trucking • Motor vehicle excise tax rate is relatively low, and revenue is distributed to General Fund – a 1% rate increase would generate $30 to $40 million
Taxes and Economic Development • Most economists agree that taxes negatively affect state economic development • NM’s GRT on business purchases puts the state at a disadvantage, even after allowing for low property taxes
Tax Incentives • Pros: • Incentives can offset other problems for firms seeking to locate here • Targeting can hold down cost, maximize “bang for the buck” • Cons: • Inequity creates tension between new and existing businesses • State-to-state tax differences are probably too small to have a major impact • Economic models can’t tell who really benefits – firm owners, workers, landowners or consumers • Can never know for certain the answer to the “but for” question • Non-economic development incentives: • How much subsidy is the right amount? • Tax Dept. cannot provide follow up, accountability • Increased complexity and cost • Direct appropriations are easier to track and make accountable
Revenue Raisers • GRT rate is too high given the breadth of the tax base – should also avoid “minimum tax” based on firms’ gross revenue • Oil and gas taxes are high enough – as a gross revenue tax, imposes a higher burden on the rate of return when prices decline • Eliminating state & local tax deduction for income tax purposes will increase complexity, increase disparities between NM and other states • Corporate income tax combined reporting is highly unpredictable • Cigarette taxes will not reduce consumption as long as tribal and internet sales are tax free -- revenue gain is much smaller than otherwise • Motor vehicle excise tax and insurance premiums tax rates are relatively low compared to other taxes – revenue would be more predictable • Re-visit more recently enacted tax preferences (review credits/exemptions/deductions for necessity ) • Streamlined Sales Tax Project will bolster the GRT in the long run